What Can We Learn from State Space Models for Machine Learning on Graphs?
2406.05815
0
0
Abstract
Machine learning on graphs has recently found extensive applications across domains. However, the commonly used Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs) suffer from limited expressive power and struggle to capture long-range dependencies. Graph transformers offer a strong alternative due to their global attention mechanism, but they come with great computational overheads, especially for large graphs. In recent years, State Space Models (SSMs) have emerged as a compelling approach to replace full attention in transformers to model sequential data. It blends the strengths of RNNs and CNNs, offering a) efficient computation, b) the ability to capture long-range dependencies, and c) good generalization across sequences of various lengths. However, extending SSMs to graph-structured data presents unique challenges due to the lack of canonical node ordering in graphs. In this work, we propose Graph State Space Convolution (GSSC) as a principled extension of SSMs to graph-structured data. By leveraging global permutation-equivariant set aggregation and factorizable graph kernels that rely on relative node distances as the convolution kernels, GSSC preserves all three advantages of SSMs. We demonstrate the provably stronger expressiveness of GSSC than MPNNs in counting graph substructures and show its effectiveness across 10 real-world, widely used benchmark datasets, where GSSC achieves best results on 7 out of 10 datasets with all significant improvements compared to the state-of-the-art baselines and second-best results on the other 3 datasets. Our findings highlight the potential of GSSC as a powerful and scalable model for graph machine learning. Our code is available at https://github.com/Graph-COM/GSSC.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores how state space models, a well-established approach in control theory and signal processing, can provide insights for machine learning on graphs.
- The authors investigate the connections between state space models and recent advancements in graph neural networks, highlighting the potential benefits of adopting a state space perspective for modeling temporal graph data.
- The paper delves into the theoretical foundations, practical considerations, and potential applications of state space models in the context of machine learning on graphs.
Plain English Explanation
State space models are a powerful mathematical framework originally developed for studying dynamic systems, such as the motion of a pendulum or the flow of electricity in a circuit. These models describe a system's evolution over time using two key components: a state variable that captures the system's internal state, and a set of equations that govern how the state changes.
In this paper, the authors explore how this state space perspective can be applied to the field of machine learning on graphs. Graphs are mathematical structures that represent interconnected systems, such as social networks or transportation networks. The authors argue that just as state space models can help us understand the dynamics of physical systems, they can also provide valuable insights for analyzing and modeling the complex, time-evolving relationships within graph-structured data.
The authors delve into the theoretical connections between state space models and emerging techniques in graph neural networks, which are a class of machine learning models designed to work directly on graph-structured data. They highlight how adopting a state space viewpoint can lead to new architectural designs, training strategies, and analysis tools for graph neural networks, potentially unlocking new capabilities and applications.
Throughout the paper, the authors provide concrete examples and analogies to help readers grasp the core ideas. For instance, they compare the state variable in a state space model to the "hidden state" of a neural network, which captures the network's internal representation of the data. By drawing these parallels, the authors aim to make the technical concepts more accessible and relevant to a broad audience interested in the intersection of machine learning and graph-structured data.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the key aspects of state space models and their historical development in fields like control theory and signal processing. The authors then explore the potential connections between state space models and recent advancements in graph neural networks, which have emerged as a powerful approach for machine learning on graph-structured data.
Central to the authors' discussion is the idea of modeling the temporal dynamics of graphs using a state space formulation. In this framework, the state of a graph at a given time step is represented by a set of latent variables, which evolve according to a set of state transition equations. The authors show how this perspective aligns with the internal workings of graph neural networks, where the hidden representations of the nodes can be thought of as the state variables.
Building on this connection, the authors delve into the implications for graph neural network architecture design, training strategies, and interpretability. For example, they discuss how the state space model formulation can inspire the development of novel graph neural network layers that explicitly model the temporal evolution of the graph, or how the state variables can be used to gain deeper insights into the network's decision-making process.
The paper also explores the potential benefits of adopting a state space approach for handling various challenges in graph-structured data, such as missing data, noisy observations, and handling of temporal dependencies. The authors highlight how the rich theoretical foundations of state space models can inform the development of more robust and principled machine learning techniques for graphs.
Throughout the technical explanation, the authors make strategic use of internal links to related papers, such as State Space Models: A New Generation of Network Alternatives, MAMBA-360: A Survey of State Space Models as Stochastic Processes, and The Illusion of State in State Space Models. These links provide readers with additional resources to explore the broader context and related research in this area.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling argument for the potential benefits of applying state space models to the field of machine learning on graphs. The authors make a strong case for the theoretical and practical connections between this well-established framework and the emerging techniques in graph neural networks.
One of the key strengths of the paper is its ability to draw clear parallels between the state variables in a state space model and the hidden representations in a graph neural network. This analogy helps to bridge the gap between the technical details and the intuitive understanding of how these models work.
However, the paper also acknowledges the challenges and limitations of adopting a state space perspective for graph-structured data. For example, the authors note that the assumptions underlying traditional state space models, such as linearity and Gaussianity, may not always align well with the complex, nonlinear, and potentially non-Gaussian nature of real-world graph data. Addressing these issues may require further advancements in the theory and implementation of state space models for graph-based machine learning.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the empirical performance of state space-inspired graph neural network models. While the authors provide a strong conceptual foundation, more extensive experimental validation would be needed to assess the practical benefits and tradeoffs of this approach compared to other state-of-the-art techniques in the field.
Overall, this paper serves as a valuable contribution to the ongoing exploration of state space models in the context of machine learning on graphs. By highlighting the potential connections and inspiring further research in this direction, the authors aim to catalyze new developments that could ultimately lead to more powerful and interpretable graph-based machine learning systems.
Conclusion
This paper offers a compelling exploration of how state space models, a well-established framework in control theory and signal processing, can provide valuable insights for the field of machine learning on graphs. The authors expertly draw parallels between the state variables in state space models and the hidden representations in graph neural networks, suggesting that adopting a state space perspective can inspire new architectural designs, training strategies, and analysis tools for graph-based machine learning.
By delving into the theoretical foundations and practical considerations of this approach, the authors pave the way for further research and development in this direction. The paper's clear explanations, strategic use of internal links, and balanced critical analysis make it a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners alike, who are interested in exploring the intersection of state space models and graph-structured data.
Ultimately, this work highlights the potential for cross-pollination between different fields, where established principles and techniques can be adapted and applied to novel domains, leading to new breakthroughs and advancements in the world of machine learning and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
State Space Models on Temporal Graphs: A First-Principles Study
Jintang Li, Ruofan Wu, Xinzhou Jin, Boqun Ma, Liang Chen, Zibin Zheng
0
0
Over the past few years, research on deep graph learning has shifted from static graphs to temporal graphs in response to real-world complex systems that exhibit dynamic behaviors. In practice, temporal graphs are formalized as an ordered sequence of static graph snapshots observed at discrete time points. Sequence models such as RNNs or Transformers have long been the predominant backbone networks for modeling such temporal graphs. Yet, despite the promising results, RNNs struggle with long-range dependencies, while transformers are burdened by quadratic computational complexity. Recently, state space models (SSMs), which are framed as discretized representations of an underlying continuous-time linear dynamical system, have garnered substantial attention and achieved breakthrough advancements in independent sequence modeling. In this work, we undertake a principled investigation that extends SSM theory to temporal graphs by integrating structural information into the online approximation objective via the adoption of a Laplacian regularization term. The emergent continuous-time system introduces novel algorithmic challenges, thereby necessitating our development of GraphSSM, a graph state space model for modeling the dynamics of temporal graphs. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our GraphSSM framework across various temporal graph benchmarks.
6/4/2024
State Space Model for New-Generation Network Alternative to Transformers: A Survey
Xiao Wang, Shiao Wang, Yuhe Ding, Yuehang Li, Wentao Wu, Yao Rong, Weizhe Kong, Ju Huang, Shihao Li, Haoxiang Yang, Ziwen Wang, Bo Jiang, Chenglong Li, Yaowei Wang, Yonghong Tian, Jin Tang
0
0
In the post-deep learning era, the Transformer architecture has demonstrated its powerful performance across pre-trained big models and various downstream tasks. However, the enormous computational demands of this architecture have deterred many researchers. To further reduce the complexity of attention models, numerous efforts have been made to design more efficient methods. Among them, the State Space Model (SSM), as a possible replacement for the self-attention based Transformer model, has drawn more and more attention in recent years. In this paper, we give the first comprehensive review of these works and also provide experimental comparisons and analysis to better demonstrate the features and advantages of SSM. Specifically, we first give a detailed description of principles to help the readers quickly capture the key ideas of SSM. After that, we dive into the reviews of existing SSMs and their various applications, including natural language processing, computer vision, graph, multi-modal and multi-media, point cloud/event stream, time series data, and other domains. In addition, we give statistical comparisons and analysis of these models and hope it helps the readers to understand the effectiveness of different structures on various tasks. Then, we propose possible research points in this direction to better promote the development of the theoretical model and application of SSM. More related works will be continuously updated on the following GitHub: https://github.com/Event-AHU/Mamba_State_Space_Model_Paper_List.
4/16/2024
š¤æ
Mamba-360: Survey of State Space Models as Transformer Alternative for Long Sequence Modelling: Methods, Applications, and Challenges
Badri Narayana Patro, Vijay Srinivas Agneeswaran
0
0
Sequence modeling is a crucial area across various domains, including Natural Language Processing (NLP), speech recognition, time series forecasting, music generation, and bioinformatics. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Long Short Term Memory Networks (LSTMs) have historically dominated sequence modeling tasks like Machine Translation, Named Entity Recognition (NER), etc. However, the advancement of transformers has led to a shift in this paradigm, given their superior performance. Yet, transformers suffer from $O(N^2)$ attention complexity and challenges in handling inductive bias. Several variations have been proposed to address these issues which use spectral networks or convolutions and have performed well on a range of tasks. However, they still have difficulty in dealing with long sequences. State Space Models(SSMs) have emerged as promising alternatives for sequence modeling paradigms in this context, especially with the advent of S4 and its variants, such as S4nd, Hippo, Hyena, Diagnol State Spaces (DSS), Gated State Spaces (GSS), Linear Recurrent Unit (LRU), Liquid-S4, Mamba, etc. In this survey, we categorize the foundational SSMs based on three paradigms namely, Gating architectures, Structural architectures, and Recurrent architectures. This survey also highlights diverse applications of SSMs across domains such as vision, video, audio, speech, language (especially long sequence modeling), medical (including genomics), chemical (like drug design), recommendation systems, and time series analysis, including tabular data. Moreover, we consolidate the performance of SSMs on benchmark datasets like Long Range Arena (LRA), WikiText, Glue, Pile, ImageNet, Kinetics-400, sstv2, as well as video datasets such as Breakfast, COIN, LVU, and various time series datasets. The project page for Mamba-360 work is available on this webpage.url{https://github.com/badripatro/mamba360}.
4/26/2024
The Illusion of State in State-Space Models
William Merrill, Jackson Petty, Ashish Sabharwal
0
0
State-space models (SSMs) have emerged as a potential alternative architecture for building large language models (LLMs) compared to the previously ubiquitous transformer architecture. One theoretical weakness of transformers is that they cannot express certain kinds of sequential computation and state tracking (Merrill & Sabharwal, 2023), which SSMs are explicitly designed to address via their close architectural similarity to recurrent neural networks (RNNs). But do SSMs truly have an advantage (over transformers) in expressive power for state tracking? Surprisingly, the answer is no. Our analysis reveals that the expressive power of SSMs is limited very similarly to transformers: SSMs cannot express computation outside the complexity class $mathsf{TC}^0$. In particular, this means they cannot solve simple state-tracking problems like permutation composition. It follows that SSMs are provably unable to accurately track chess moves with certain notation, evaluate code, or track entities in a long narrative. To supplement our formal analysis, we report experiments showing that Mamba-style SSMs indeed struggle with state tracking. Thus, despite its recurrent formulation, the state in an SSM is an illusion: SSMs have similar expressiveness limitations to non-recurrent models like transformers, which may fundamentally limit their ability to solve real-world state-tracking problems.
6/6/2024