What is Point Supervision Worth in Video Instance Segmentation?
2404.01990
0
0
๐ฏ
Abstract
Video instance segmentation (VIS) is a challenging vision task that aims to detect, segment, and track objects in videos. Conventional VIS methods rely on densely-annotated object masks which are expensive. We reduce the human annotations to only one point for each object in a video frame during training, and obtain high-quality mask predictions close to fully supervised models. Our proposed training method consists of a class-agnostic proposal generation module to provide rich negative samples and a spatio-temporal point-based matcher to match the object queries with the provided point annotations. Comprehensive experiments on three VIS benchmarks demonstrate competitive performance of the proposed framework, nearly matching fully supervised methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides guidelines for authors on formatting their responses when submitting revisions to academic papers.
- The guidelines cover important considerations like response length, formatting, and content.
- The goal is to help authors effectively communicate updates and address reviewer feedback in a clear and structured manner.
Plain English Explanation
The paper outlines best practices for authors when responding to feedback on their research papers. Revising a paper can be a complex process, as authors need to address the specific concerns raised by reviewers while also highlighting the key updates and improvements made to the work.
The guidelines aim to help streamline this process by providing a standard format for the author's response. This includes recommendations on the appropriate length, layout, and content to include. For example, the guidelines suggest keeping the response concise, focusing on the most salient points, and structuring the text in a logical way.
By following these guidelines, authors can craft a clear and effective response that effectively communicates their changes and addresses reviewer feedback. This helps facilitate a productive dialogue between authors and reviewers, ultimately strengthening the final paper.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by advising authors to limit the length of their response, as reviewers often have limited time to read through lengthy documents. Specifically, it recommends keeping the response under 2 pages.
In terms of formatting, the guidelines suggest using standard LaTeX markup and organizing the response into sections. This includes an "Introduction" section to provide context, followed by sections addressing each of the reviewer comments in turn. Authors are also encouraged to use descriptive section headings and maintain a professional, courteous tone throughout.
When it comes to content, the guidelines emphasize the importance of directly addressing each reviewer comment. Authors should explain how they have revised the paper in response to the feedback, highlighting the specific changes made. They should also provide a clear rationale for any disagreements with the reviewer's suggestions.
Additionally, the paper advises authors to include supplementary material like figures or tables if relevant, as this can help illustrate the updates made. Proper citation of related work is also recommended to situate the revisions within the broader context of the research field.
Critical Analysis
The guidelines presented in this paper seem well-reasoned and grounded in the practical realities of the academic peer review process. By providing a standardized format, the guidelines can help ensure that author responses are coherent, focused, and easy for reviewers to digest.
That said, the guidelines do not delve into some of the more nuanced aspects of crafting an effective author response. For example, they do not discuss strategies for diplomatically disagreeing with reviewer feedback or techniques for framing revisions in a persuasive manner.
Additionally, the guidelines could potentially be expanded to offer more detailed recommendations on stylistic elements, such as the appropriate level of formality, use of visuals, and overall tone. These aspects can significantly impact the perceived professionalism and persuasiveness of the author's response.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper offers a solid foundation for authors seeking to optimize their responses to reviewer feedback. By following the guidelines, authors can present a clear, well-structured case for the updates made to their paper, facilitating a productive dialogue with reviewers.
As academic publishing continues to evolve, guidelines like these will likely become increasingly important in helping authors navigate the peer review process effectively. Adherence to such standards can ultimately lead to stronger, more polished research outputs that make meaningful contributions to their respective fields.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
PM-VIS: High-Performance Box-Supervised Video Instance Segmentation
Zhangjing Yang, Dun Liu, Wensheng Cheng, Jinqiao Wang, Yi Wu
0
0
Labeling pixel-wise object masks in videos is a resource-intensive and laborious process. Box-supervised Video Instance Segmentation (VIS) methods have emerged as a viable solution to mitigate the labor-intensive annotation process. . In practical applications, the two-step approach is not only more flexible but also exhibits a higher recognition accuracy. Inspired by the recent success of Segment Anything Model (SAM), we introduce a novel approach that aims at harnessing instance box annotations from multiple perspectives to generate high-quality instance pseudo masks, thus enriching the information contained in instance annotations. We leverage ground-truth boxes to create three types of pseudo masks using the HQ-SAM model, the box-supervised VIS model (IDOL-BoxInst), and the VOS model (DeAOT) separately, along with three corresponding optimization mechanisms. Additionally, we introduce two ground-truth data filtering methods, assisted by high-quality pseudo masks, to further enhance the training dataset quality and improve the performance of fully supervised VIS methods. To fully capitalize on the obtained high-quality Pseudo Masks, we introduce a novel algorithm, PM-VIS, to integrate mask losses into IDOL-BoxInst. Our PM-VIS model, trained with high-quality pseudo mask annotations, demonstrates strong ability in instance mask prediction, achieving state-of-the-art performance on the YouTube-VIS 2019, YouTube-VIS 2021, and OVIS validation sets, notably narrowing the gap between box-supervised and fully supervised VIS methods.
4/23/2024
New!PM-VIS+: High-Performance Video Instance Segmentation without Video Annotation
Zhangjing Yang, Dun Liu, Xin Wang, Zhe Li, Barathwaj Anandan, Yi Wu
0
0
Video instance segmentation requires detecting, segmenting, and tracking objects in videos, typically relying on costly video annotations. This paper introduces a method that eliminates video annotations by utilizing image datasets. The PM-VIS algorithm is adapted to handle both bounding box and instance-level pixel annotations dynamically. We introduce ImageNet-bbox to supplement missing categories in video datasets and propose the PM-VIS+ algorithm to adjust supervision based on annotation types. To enhance accuracy, we use pseudo masks and semi-supervised optimization techniques on unannotated video data. This method achieves high video instance segmentation performance without manual video annotations, offering a cost-effective solution and new perspectives for video instance segmentation applications. The code will be available in https://github.com/ldknight/PM-VIS-plus
7/1/2024
๐งช
Point-VOS: Pointing Up Video Object Segmentation
Idil Esen Zulfikar, Sabarinath Mahadevan, Paul Voigtlaender, Bastian Leibe
0
0
Current state-of-the-art Video Object Segmentation (VOS) methods rely on dense per-object mask annotations both during training and testing. This requires time-consuming and costly video annotation mechanisms. We propose a novel Point-VOS task with a spatio-temporally sparse point-wise annotation scheme that substantially reduces the annotation effort. We apply our annotation scheme to two large-scale video datasets with text descriptions and annotate over 19M points across 133K objects in 32K videos. Based on our annotations, we propose a new Point-VOS benchmark, and a corresponding point-based training mechanism, which we use to establish strong baseline results. We show that existing VOS methods can easily be adapted to leverage our point annotations during training, and can achieve results close to the fully-supervised performance when trained on pseudo-masks generated from these points. In addition, we show that our data can be used to improve models that connect vision and language, by evaluating it on the Video Narrative Grounding (VNG) task. We will make our code and annotations available at https://pointvos.github.io.
6/11/2024
๐จโ๐ซ
Extreme Point Supervised Instance Segmentation
Hyeonjun Lee, Sehyun Hwang, Suha Kwak
0
0
This paper introduces a novel approach to learning instance segmentation using extreme points, i.e., the topmost, leftmost, bottommost, and rightmost points, of each object. These points are readily available in the modern bounding box annotation process while offering strong clues for precise segmentation, and thus allows to improve performance at the same annotation cost with box-supervised methods. Our work considers extreme points as a part of the true instance mask and propagates them to identify potential foreground and background points, which are all together used for training a pseudo label generator. Then pseudo labels given by the generator are in turn used for supervised learning of our final model. On three public benchmarks, our method significantly outperforms existing box-supervised methods, further narrowing the gap with its fully supervised counterpart. In particular, our model generates high-quality masks when a target object is separated into multiple parts, where previous box-supervised methods often fail.
6/5/2024