4D-fy: Text-to-4D Generation Using Hybrid Score Distillation Sampling
0
🛸
Sign in to get full access
Overview
This paper provides guidelines for authors to format their response submissions to the LATEX conference. The guidelines cover important aspects such as the length of the response and the formatting requirements.
Plain English Explanation
The paper outlines the key guidelines that authors should follow when submitting their responses to the LATEX conference. The main points include:
- Response Length: The response should be no longer than 2 pages, including all text, figures, and references.
- Formatting: The response should be formatted using the provided LATEX template, which includes specific instructions for things like font size, margins, and spacing.
- Figures and Tables: Any figures or tables included in the response should be properly formatted and referenced in the text.
- References: References should be formatted according to the specified guidelines, using a consistent citation style.
By following these guidelines, authors can ensure that their responses are properly formatted and easy for the conference organizers to review.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides a set of guidelines for authors to follow when submitting their responses to the LATEX conference. The key elements covered include:
-
Response Length: The authors are instructed to keep their response to a maximum of 2 pages, including all text, figures, and references. This ensures that the conference organizers can efficiently review a large number of submissions.
-
Formatting: The authors are provided with a LATEX template that specifies the required formatting, including font size, margins, and spacing. This ensures a consistent look and feel across all submissions.
-
Figures and Tables: The guidelines provide instructions on how to properly format and reference any figures or tables included in the response. This ensures that the content is clear and easy to understand.
-
References: The authors are instructed to format their references according to the specified guidelines, using a consistent citation style. This makes it easier for the conference organizers to verify the sources used in the responses.
By following these guidelines, the authors can ensure that their responses are properly formatted and easy for the conference organizers to review, which ultimately improves the efficiency and effectiveness of the review process.
Critical Analysis
The guidelines provided in this paper are well-designed and comprehensive, covering the key aspects that authors need to consider when submitting their responses to the LATEX conference. The focus on maintaining a consistent format and style across all submissions is particularly valuable, as it helps to ensure a fair and efficient review process.
One potential limitation of the guidelines is that they may not account for unique or innovative formatting approaches that some authors may wish to explore. While the guidelines are necessary to maintain a standardized review process, they could potentially stifle creative expression or alternative presentation methods.
Additionally, the guidelines do not address the content or quality of the responses themselves, which are arguably more important than the formatting. While the guidelines help to ensure that the responses are easy to read and review, they do not provide any insights into the underlying research or ideas being presented.
Overall, the guidelines provided in this paper are well-crafted and serve an important purpose in the LATEX conference submission process. However, it is important to consider the potential limitations and to encourage authors to focus on the quality and substance of their work, in addition to the formatting.
Conclusion
The LATEX Guidelines for Author Response provide a clear and comprehensive set of instructions for authors to follow when submitting their responses to the LATEX conference. By adhering to these guidelines, authors can ensure that their submissions are properly formatted and easy for the conference organizers to review.
The guidelines cover key aspects such as response length, formatting requirements, figure and table formatting, and reference formatting. By maintaining a consistent format across all submissions, the conference organizers can efficiently review a large number of responses and ensure a fair and effective review process.
While the guidelines are necessary to maintain a standardized review process, it is important to consider the potential limitations and to encourage authors to focus on the quality and substance of their work, in addition to the formatting. Overall, the guidelines provided in this paper are a valuable resource for authors looking to submit their work to the LATEX conference.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛸
0
4D-fy: Text-to-4D Generation Using Hybrid Score Distillation Sampling
Sherwin Bahmani, Ivan Skorokhodov, Victor Rong, Gordon Wetzstein, Leonidas Guibas, Peter Wonka, Sergey Tulyakov, Jeong Joon Park, Andrea Tagliasacchi, David B. Lindell
Recent breakthroughs in text-to-4D generation rely on pre-trained text-to-image and text-to-video models to generate dynamic 3D scenes. However, current text-to-4D methods face a three-way tradeoff between the quality of scene appearance, 3D structure, and motion. For example, text-to-image models and their 3D-aware variants are trained on internet-scale image datasets and can be used to produce scenes with realistic appearance and 3D structure -- but no motion. Text-to-video models are trained on relatively smaller video datasets and can produce scenes with motion, but poorer appearance and 3D structure. While these models have complementary strengths, they also have opposing weaknesses, making it difficult to combine them in a way that alleviates this three-way tradeoff. Here, we introduce hybrid score distillation sampling, an alternating optimization procedure that blends supervision signals from multiple pre-trained diffusion models and incorporates benefits of each for high-fidelity text-to-4D generation. Using hybrid SDS, we demonstrate synthesis of 4D scenes with compelling appearance, 3D structure, and motion.
Read more5/28/2024
0
4Dynamic: Text-to-4D Generation with Hybrid Priors
Yu-Jie Yuan, Leif Kobbelt, Jiwen Liu, Yuan Zhang, Pengfei Wan, Yu-Kun Lai, Lin Gao
Due to the fascinating generative performance of text-to-image diffusion models, growing text-to-3D generation works explore distilling the 2D generative priors into 3D, using the score distillation sampling (SDS) loss, to bypass the data scarcity problem. The existing text-to-3D methods have achieved promising results in realism and 3D consistency, but text-to-4D generation still faces challenges, including lack of realism and insufficient dynamic motions. In this paper, we propose a novel method for text-to-4D generation, which ensures the dynamic amplitude and authenticity through direct supervision provided by a video prior. Specifically, we adopt a text-to-video diffusion model to generate a reference video and divide 4D generation into two stages: static generation and dynamic generation. The static 3D generation is achieved under the guidance of the input text and the first frame of the reference video, while in the dynamic generation stage, we introduce a customized SDS loss to ensure multi-view consistency, a video-based SDS loss to improve temporal consistency, and most importantly, direct priors from the reference video to ensure the quality of geometry and texture. Moreover, we design a prior-switching training strategy to avoid conflicts between different priors and fully leverage the benefits of each prior. In addition, to enrich the generated motion, we further introduce a dynamic modeling representation composed of a deformation network and a topology network, which ensures dynamic continuity while modeling topological changes. Our method not only supports text-to-4D generation but also enables 4D generation from monocular videos. The comparison experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method compared to existing methods.
Read more7/18/2024
0
A Unified Approach for Text- and Image-guided 4D Scene Generation
Yufeng Zheng, Xueting Li, Koki Nagano, Sifei Liu, Karsten Kreis, Otmar Hilliges, Shalini De Mello
Large-scale diffusion generative models are greatly simplifying image, video and 3D asset creation from user-provided text prompts and images. However, the challenging problem of text-to-4D dynamic 3D scene generation with diffusion guidance remains largely unexplored. We propose Dream-in-4D, which features a novel two-stage approach for text-to-4D synthesis, leveraging (1) 3D and 2D diffusion guidance to effectively learn a high-quality static 3D asset in the first stage; (2) a deformable neural radiance field that explicitly disentangles the learned static asset from its deformation, preserving quality during motion learning; and (3) a multi-resolution feature grid for the deformation field with a displacement total variation loss to effectively learn motion with video diffusion guidance in the second stage. Through a user preference study, we demonstrate that our approach significantly advances image and motion quality, 3D consistency and text fidelity for text-to-4D generation compared to baseline approaches. Thanks to its motion-disentangled representation, Dream-in-4D can also be easily adapted for controllable generation where appearance is defined by one or multiple images, without the need to modify the motion learning stage. Thus, our method offers, for the first time, a unified approach for text-to-4D, image-to-4D and personalized 4D generation tasks.
Read more5/8/2024
0
Flow Score Distillation for Diverse Text-to-3D Generation
Runjie Yan, Kailu Wu, Kaisheng Ma
Recent advancements in Text-to-3D generation have yielded remarkable progress, particularly through methods that rely on Score Distillation Sampling (SDS). While SDS exhibits the capability to create impressive 3D assets, it is hindered by its inherent maximum-likelihood-seeking essence, resulting in limited diversity in generation outcomes. In this paper, we discover that the Denoise Diffusion Implicit Models (DDIM) generation process (ie PF-ODE) can be succinctly expressed using an analogue of SDS loss. One step further, one can see SDS as a generalized DDIM generation process. Following this insight, we show that the noise sampling strategy in the noise addition stage significantly restricts the diversity of generation results. To address this limitation, we present an innovative noise sampling approach and introduce a novel text-to-3D method called Flow Score Distillation (FSD). Our validation experiments across various text-to-image Diffusion Models demonstrate that FSD substantially enhances generation diversity without compromising quality.
Read more7/30/2024