Accelerating Inference of Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Sparse Context Selection
2405.16178
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) augmented with retrieval exhibit robust performance and extensive versatility by incorporating external contexts. However, the input length grows linearly in the number of retrieved documents, causing a dramatic increase in latency. In this paper, we propose a novel paradigm named Sparse RAG, which seeks to cut computation costs through sparsity. Specifically, Sparse RAG encodes retrieved documents in parallel, which eliminates latency introduced by long-range attention of retrieved documents. Then, LLMs selectively decode the output by only attending to highly relevant caches auto-regressively, which are chosen via prompting LLMs with special control tokens. It is notable that Sparse RAG combines the assessment of each individual document and the generation of the response into a single process. The designed sparse mechanism in a RAG system can facilitate the reduction of the number of documents loaded during decoding for accelerating the inference of the RAG system. Additionally, filtering out undesirable contexts enhances the model's focus on relevant context, inherently improving its generation quality. Evaluation results of two datasets show that Sparse RAG can strike an optimal balance between generation quality and computational efficiency, demonstrating its generalizability across both short- and long-form generation tasks.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a novel approach to accelerating the inference of retrieval-augmented generation models, which combine language models with retrieval systems to generate more informative and coherent text.
- The key idea is to use a sparse context selection mechanism to identify the most relevant context information, reducing the computational cost of the retrieval process.
- The paper demonstrates that this approach can significantly improve the efficiency of retrieval-augmented generation while maintaining high-quality outputs.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to make retrieval-augmented generation models run more quickly. Retrieval-augmented generation is a technique that combines a language model, which generates text, with a retrieval system, which pulls in relevant information from a database to include in the output.
The researchers found that they could speed up these models by only using the most important parts of the context information when generating the text, rather than considering all the available information. This "sparse context selection" approach reduces the computational load of the retrieval process, making the whole system faster without sacrificing the quality of the generated text.
The paper shows that this technique can significantly improve the efficiency of retrieval-augmented generation, which could be useful for applications that require fast text generation, such as chatbots or content creation tools.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a sparse context selection mechanism to accelerate the inference of retrieval-augmented generation models. These models combine a language model, which generates text, with a retrieval system, which pulls in relevant information from a database to include in the output.
The key idea is to use a sparse attention mechanism to identify the most relevant context information, rather than considering all the available information. This reduces the computational cost of the retrieval process, as the model only needs to process a subset of the context.
The paper evaluates this approach on various text generation tasks, including question answering and knowledge-grounded dialogue. The results show that the sparse context selection mechanism can significantly improve the efficiency of retrieval-augmented generation, with only a small impact on output quality.
The authors also explore different strategies for selecting the sparse context, such as using importance scores or reinforcement learning. They find that a simple approach based on importance scores works well in practice, providing a good balance between efficiency and effectiveness.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the efficiency of retrieval-augmented generation models, which is an important challenge for these types of systems. The sparse context selection mechanism is a clever way to reduce the computational burden of the retrieval process, and the experimental results demonstrate its effectiveness.
However, the paper does not explore the limitations of this approach in depth. For example, it would be interesting to understand how the sparse context selection mechanism performs on more complex or open-ended generation tasks, where the relevance of the retrieved information may be more nuanced.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential trade-offs between the level of sparsity and the quality of the generated output. It would be valuable to understand how the model's performance scales as the context selection becomes more aggressive, and whether there are any thresholds or diminishing returns that users should be aware of.
Finally, the paper does not address the potential implications of this work for the broader field of retrieval-augmented generation and large language models. It would be interesting to see the authors contextualize their findings within the larger trends and challenges in this area of research.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to accelerating the inference of retrieval-augmented generation models, a important class of language models that combine generation with retrieval from external knowledge sources. The key idea is to use a sparse context selection mechanism to identify the most relevant information, reducing the computational cost of the retrieval process.
The experimental results demonstrate that this approach can significantly improve the efficiency of retrieval-augmented generation, with only a small impact on output quality. This could have important implications for applications that require fast text generation, such as chatbots or content creation tools.
While the paper does not explore all the potential limitations and trade-offs of this technique, it represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to enhance the capabilities and efficiency of retrieval-augmented generation systems. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, approaches like the one presented in this paper will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of these powerful language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛸
xRAG: Extreme Context Compression for Retrieval-augmented Generation with One Token
Xin Cheng, Xun Wang, Xingxing Zhang, Tao Ge, Si-Qing Chen, Furu Wei, Huishuai Zhang, Dongyan Zhao
0
0
This paper introduces xRAG, an innovative context compression method tailored for retrieval-augmented generation. xRAG reinterprets document embeddings in dense retrieval--traditionally used solely for retrieval--as features from the retrieval modality. By employing a modality fusion methodology, xRAG seamlessly integrates these embeddings into the language model representation space, effectively eliminating the need for their textual counterparts and achieving an extreme compression rate. In xRAG, the only trainable component is the modality bridge, while both the retriever and the language model remain frozen. This design choice allows for the reuse of offline-constructed document embeddings and preserves the plug-and-play nature of retrieval augmentation. Experimental results demonstrate that xRAG achieves an average improvement of over 10% across six knowledge-intensive tasks, adaptable to various language model backbones, ranging from a dense 7B model to an 8x7B Mixture of Experts configuration. xRAG not only significantly outperforms previous context compression methods but also matches the performance of uncompressed models on several datasets, while reducing overall FLOPs by a factor of 3.53. Our work pioneers new directions in retrieval-augmented generation from the perspective of multimodality fusion, and we hope it lays the foundation for future efficient and scalable retrieval-augmented systems
5/24/2024
LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMs
Ziyan Jiang, Xueguang Ma, Wenhu Chen
0
0
In traditional RAG framework, the basic retrieval units are normally short. The common retrievers like DPR normally work with 100-word Wikipedia paragraphs. Such a design forces the retriever to search over a large corpus to find the `needle' unit. In contrast, the readers only need to extract answers from the short retrieved units. Such an imbalanced `heavy' retriever and `light' reader design can lead to sub-optimal performance. In order to alleviate the imbalance, we propose a new framework LongRAG, consisting of a `long retriever' and a `long reader'. LongRAG processes the entire Wikipedia into 4K-token units, which is 30x longer than before. By increasing the unit size, we significantly reduce the total units from 22M to 700K. This significantly lowers the burden of retriever, which leads to a remarkable retrieval score: answer recall@1=71% on NQ (previously 52%) and answer recall@2=72% (previously 47%) on HotpotQA (full-wiki). Then we feed the top-k retrieved units ($approx$ 30K tokens) to an existing long-context LLM to perform zero-shot answer extraction. Without requiring any training, LongRAG achieves an EM of 62.7% on NQ, which is the best known result. LongRAG also achieves 64.3% on HotpotQA (full-wiki), which is on par of the SoTA model. Our study offers insights into the future roadmap for combining RAG with long-context LLMs.
6/24/2024
Context-augmented Retrieval: A Novel Framework for Fast Information Retrieval based Response Generation using Large Language Model
Sai Ganesh, Anupam Purwar, Gautam B
0
0
Generating high-quality answers consistently by providing contextual information embedded in the prompt passed to the Large Language Model (LLM) is dependent on the quality of information retrieval. As the corpus of contextual information grows, the answer/inference quality of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based Question Answering (QA) systems declines. This work solves this problem by combining classical text classification with the Large Language Model (LLM) to enable quick information retrieval from the vector store and ensure the relevancy of retrieved information. For the same, this work proposes a new approach Context Augmented retrieval (CAR), where partitioning of vector database by real-time classification of information flowing into the corpus is done. CAR demonstrates good quality answer generation along with significant reduction in information retrieval and answer generation time.
6/26/2024
CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation?
Zora Zhiruo Wang, Akari Asai, Xinyan Velocity Yu, Frank F. Xu, Yiqing Xie, Graham Neubig, Daniel Fried
0
0
While language models (LMs) have proven remarkably adept at generating code, many programs are challenging for LMs to generate using their parametric knowledge alone. Providing external contexts such as library documentation can facilitate generating accurate and functional code. Despite the success of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) in various text-oriented tasks, its potential for improving code generation remains under-explored. In this work, we conduct a systematic, large-scale analysis by asking: in what scenarios can retrieval benefit code generation models? and what challenges remain? We first curate a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, CodeRAG-Bench, encompassing three categories of code generation tasks, including basic programming, open-domain, and repository-level problems. We aggregate documents from five sources for models to retrieve contexts: competition solutions, online tutorials, library documentation, StackOverflow posts, and GitHub repositories. We examine top-performing models on CodeRAG-Bench by providing contexts retrieved from one or multiple sources. While notable gains are made in final code generation by retrieving high-quality contexts across various settings, our analysis reveals room for improvement -- current retrievers still struggle to fetch useful contexts especially with limited lexical overlap, and generators fail to improve with limited context lengths or abilities to integrate additional contexts. We hope CodeRAG-Bench serves as an effective testbed to encourage further development of advanced code-oriented RAG methods.
6/21/2024