Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in the Mitigation of Membership Inference Attack in Federated Learning

Overview

• Federated learning is a privacy-preserving machine learning technique where models are trained on decentralized data without sharing the raw data.
• Membership inference attacks can compromise the privacy of federated learning by identifying whether a sample was used in the model training.
• This paper explores the accuracy-privacy trade-off in mitigating membership inference attacks in federated learning.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a way to train machine learning models without sharing the raw data. Instead of sending data to a central server, the data stays on individual devices and only the model updates are shared. This helps protect the privacy of the data.

However, membership inference attacks can still compromise this privacy. These attacks can identify whether a specific data sample was used to train the model. This means the privacy of the individual data owners is at risk, even with federated learning.

This paper looks at the trade-off between accuracy and privacy when trying to mitigate these membership inference attacks in federated learning. The researchers explore different techniques to protect privacy while maintaining the model's performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes several methods to mitigate membership inference attacks in federated learning:

1. Differentially Private Federated Learning (DPFL): This adds noise to the model updates to provide differential privacy guarantees and obfuscate the presence of individual samples.

2. Selective Model Update (SMU): This selectively updates only a subset of the model parameters to reduce information leakage about the training data.

3. Selective Model Aggregation (SMA): This aggregates only a subset of the client model updates to the global model, limiting the impact of individual updates.

The paper evaluates these techniques on different federated learning tasks and datasets. The results show that there is a trade-off between the privacy guarantee and the model's predictive performance. The proposed methods can effectively mitigate membership inference attacks, but this comes at the cost of some accuracy loss.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive exploration of the accuracy-privacy trade-off in federated learning. The proposed techniques, such as DPFL, SMU, and SMA, offer promising approaches to address membership inference attacks.

However, the paper acknowledges that these methods may not be suitable for all federated learning scenarios. The degree of accuracy loss and the specific privacy guarantees provided by each technique may vary depending on the task, dataset, and threat model.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational and communication overhead introduced by these privacy-preserving mechanisms. In a real-world federated learning deployment, these factors may be crucial considerations.

Further research could explore ways to optimize the balance between privacy and accuracy, potentially through adaptive or personalized privacy mechanisms. Investigating the long-term implications of these techniques on model robustness and generalization would also be valuable.

Conclusion

This paper presents an important exploration of the accuracy-privacy trade-off in federated learning, with a focus on mitigating membership inference attacks. The proposed techniques, such as DPFL, SMU, and SMA, demonstrate the feasibility of enhancing privacy while maintaining reasonable model performance.

The findings highlight the inherent challenges in simultaneously achieving strong privacy guarantees and high model accuracy in federated learning. As the field of federated learning continues to evolve, this research contributes valuable insights and a foundation for future work in developing more effective privacy-preserving mechanisms.