Achieving Narrative Change Through AR: Displacing the Single Story to Create Spatial Justice

Overview

• This paper explores how Augmented Reality (AR) can help overcome the bias of single stories and promote multidimensional narratives, particularly in the context of a youth gun violence prevention project.
• The research examines artifacts from the Augmented Voices project and the Clarkston AR Gateways project, which use AR to amplify marginalized voices and shift narratives around social issues.
• The paper also discusses how AR can be leveraged for teaching linguistic justice, preserving history, and site-specific AR experiences.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how Augmented Reality (AR) can help overcome the problem of single, limited stories by allowing for more multidimensional narratives. This is particularly relevant in the context of a youth gun violence prevention project, where AR is used to amplify the voices and perspectives of marginalized groups.

The research examines projects like Augmented Voices and Clarkston AR Gateways, which utilize AR to shift dominant narratives around social issues. For example, the Augmented Voices project uses AR to highlight the personal stories and experiences of individuals affected by gun violence, rather than relying on a single, oversimplified story.

The paper also discusses how AR can be applied in other contexts, such as teaching linguistic justice, preserving historical narratives, and creating site-specific AR experiences. In each case, the technology is used to challenge dominant perspectives and amplify marginalized voices.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines how Augmented Reality (AR) can overcome the limitations of single-story narratives by enabling more multidimensional and inclusive storytelling. The researchers analyze artifacts from two projects that leverage AR for narrative change: the Augmented Voices project, which focuses on gun violence prevention, and the Clarkston AR Gateways project, which aims to shift narratives around refugee communities.

The paper also discusses other applications of AR for challenging dominant narratives, such as teaching linguistic justice, preserving historical perspectives, and creating site-specific AR experiences. In each case, the researchers explore how the multidimensional nature of AR can help overcome the limitations of single-story narratives and promote more inclusive, nuanced understandings of complex social issues.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling argument for the use of Augmented Reality to address the problem of single-story narratives and promote more multidimensional storytelling. The researchers offer well-documented case studies that demonstrate the potential of AR to amplify marginalized voices and shift dominant narratives around social issues.

However, the paper does not fully address potential limitations or challenges of using AR for narrative change. For example, it does not discuss issues related to accessibility, user adoption, or the potential for AR to be used to reinforce existing power structures. Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a more in-depth exploration of the ethical considerations and potential unintended consequences of using AR in this context.

Overall, the research is a valuable contribution to the field, but further exploration of the nuances and potential pitfalls of using AR for narrative change would strengthen the analysis.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the promising potential of Augmented Reality (AR) to overcome the bias of single-story narratives and promote more multidimensional understandings of complex social issues. By examining projects like Augmented Voices and Clarkston AR Gateways, the researchers demonstrate how AR can be used to amplify marginalized voices and shift dominant narratives.

The paper also explores how AR can be leveraged for teaching linguistic justice, preserving historical perspectives, and creating site-specific AR experiences, further highlighting the technology's potential to challenge and expand the way we understand and engage with complex social issues. While the paper could have delved deeper into potential limitations and ethical considerations, it provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing conversation around the role of technology in narrative change and social justice.