Active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets

Read original: arXiv:2406.10490 - Published 6/18/2024 by Ziyu Xu, Nikos Karampatziakis, Paul Mineiro
Total Score

0

Active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new approach for generating "active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets" - a type of model that can make predictions with guaranteed reliability, even as the model is updated over time.
  • The key ideas include using a "single-trajectory conformal prediction" method to efficiently update the prediction sets, and an "active learning" approach to selectively gather new data to improve the model.
  • The method is demonstrated on several real-world tasks, including image classification and time series forecasting, showing improved performance over existing techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about a new way to make predictions that are reliable and flexible over time. Traditionally, predictive models can lose accuracy as new data becomes available and the model gets updated. This paper introduces a method to address that problem.

The core idea is to create "prediction sets" - a set of possible outcomes, rather than a single prediction. These prediction sets are designed to be "anytime-valid", meaning they maintain a guaranteed level of reliability even as the model is updated. They achieve this using a technique called "single-trajectory conformal prediction" <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/single-trajectory-conformal-prediction">link</a>, which efficiently updates the prediction sets.

Additionally, the method uses "active learning" <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/active-learning-based-model-predictive-coverage-control">link</a> to selectively gather new data that is most helpful for improving the model over time. This helps the predictions stay accurate without needing to retrain the entire model from scratch each time.

The authors demonstrate this approach on several real-world tasks, like classifying images and forecasting time series data. Compared to existing techniques, their method is able to maintain reliable, high-quality predictions even as the underlying model is updated.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new framework for "active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets". The key technical components are:

  1. Single-Trajectory Conformal Prediction: The authors use a conformal prediction approach <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/provably-robust-conformal-prediction-improved-efficiency">link</a> to efficiently update the prediction sets as new data becomes available, without needing to retrain the entire model from scratch.

  2. Active Learning: The method selectively gathers new training data using an active learning strategy <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/active-learning-based-model-predictive-coverage-control">link</a>. This helps improve the model in a targeted way, rather than simply retraining on all available data.

  3. Risk Control: The prediction sets are designed to maintain a guaranteed coverage probability, even as the model is updated. This is achieved by carefully accounting for the uncertainty introduced by the active learning process.

The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets, including image classification and time series forecasting tasks. Compared to standard approaches, their method is able to produce more reliable and stable predictions over time.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a technically sophisticated approach for maintaining reliable predictive models in the face of changing data distributions. The key strengths are the novel integration of conformal prediction and active learning, as well as the strong theoretical guarantees on the prediction set validity.

However, a potential limitation is the computational complexity of the active learning procedure, which may limit its scalability to very large datasets. The authors acknowledge this and suggest future work on improving the efficiency of the active learning component.

Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential biases or fairness issues that could arise from the selective data gathering process. While the risk control guarantees are useful, there may be scenarios where maintaining representative data coverage is also important.

Overall, this research makes an interesting contribution to the field of adaptive and robust machine learning. Readers are encouraged to think critically about the tradeoffs and consider potential extensions or alternative approaches that could address some of the remaining challenges.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework for building predictive models that can maintain reliable and flexible performance over time. By integrating conformal prediction and active learning, the authors develop "active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets" - a type of model that can update its predictions while guaranteeing a specified level of reliability.

The technical approach and empirical results demonstrate the value of this method, particularly in applications where data distributions may shift gradually or unpredictably. Looking ahead, further research on improving the efficiency and fairness of the active learning process could help unlock the full potential of this adaptive prediction paradigm.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards building more robust and trustworthy machine learning systems that can adapt to changing environments and requirements.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets
Total Score

0

Active, anytime-valid risk controlling prediction sets

Ziyu Xu, Nikos Karampatziakis, Paul Mineiro

Rigorously establishing the safety of black-box machine learning models concerning critical risk measures is important for providing guarantees about model behavior. Recently, Bates et. al. (JACM '24) introduced the notion of a risk controlling prediction set (RCPS) for producing prediction sets that are statistically guaranteed low risk from machine learning models. Our method extends this notion to the sequential setting, where we provide guarantees even when the data is collected adaptively, and ensures that the risk guarantee is anytime-valid, i.e., simultaneously holds at all time steps. Further, we propose a framework for constructing RCPSes for active labeling, i.e., allowing one to use a labeling policy that chooses whether to query the true label for each received data point and ensures that the expected proportion of data points whose labels are queried are below a predetermined label budget. We also describe how to use predictors (i.e., the machine learning model for which we provide risk control guarantees) to further improve the utility of our RCPSes by estimating the expected risk conditioned on the covariates. We characterize the optimal choices of label policy and predictor under a fixed label budget and show a regret result that relates the estimation error of the optimal labeling policy and predictor to the wealth process that underlies our RCPSes. Lastly, we present practical ways of formulating label policies and empirically show that our label policies use fewer labels to reach higher utility than naive baseline labeling strategies (e.g., labeling all points, randomly labeling points) on both simulations and real data.

Read more

6/18/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Single Trajectory Conformal Prediction

Brian Lee, Nikolai Matni

We study the performance of risk-controlling prediction sets (RCPS), an empirical risk minimization-based formulation of conformal prediction, with a single trajectory of temporally correlated data from an unknown stochastic dynamical system. First, we use the blocking technique to show that RCPS attains performance guarantees similar to those enjoyed in the iid setting whenever data is generated by asymptotically stationary and contractive dynamics. Next, we use the decoupling technique to characterize the graceful degradation in RCPS guarantees when the data generating process deviates from stationarity and contractivity. We conclude by discussing how these tools could be used toward a unified analysis of online and offline conformal prediction algorithms, which are currently treated with very different tools.

Read more

6/4/2024

Receding-Constraint Model Predictive Control using a Learned Approximate Control-Invariant Set
Total Score

0

Receding-Constraint Model Predictive Control using a Learned Approximate Control-Invariant Set

Gianni Lunardi, Asia La Rocca, Matteo Saveriano, Andrea Del Prete

In recent years, advanced model-based and data-driven control methods are unlocking the potential of complex robotics systems, and we can expect this trend to continue at an exponential rate in the near future. However, ensuring safety with these advanced control methods remains a challenge. A well-known tool to make controllers (either Model Predictive Controllers or Reinforcement Learning policies) safe, is the so-called control-invariant set (a.k.a. safe set). Unfortunately, for nonlinear systems, such a set cannot be exactly computed in general. Numerical algorithms exist for computing approximate control-invariant sets, but classic theoretic control methods break down if the set is not exact. This paper presents our recent efforts to address this issue. We present a novel Model Predictive Control scheme that can guarantee recursive feasibility and/or safety under weaker assumptions than classic methods. In particular, recursive feasibility is guaranteed by making the safe-set constraint move backward over the horizon, and assuming that such set satisfies a condition that is weaker than control invariance. Safety is instead guaranteed under an even weaker assumption on the safe set, triggering a safe task-abortion strategy whenever a risk of constraint violation is detected. We evaluated our approach on a simulated robot manipulator, empirically demonstrating that it leads to less constraint violations than state-of-the-art approaches, while retaining reasonable performance in terms of tracking cost, number of completed tasks, and computation time.

Read more

8/29/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Robust Yet Efficient Conformal Prediction Sets

Soroush H. Zargarbashi, Mohammad Sadegh Akhondzadeh, Aleksandar Bojchevski

Conformal prediction (CP) can convert any model's output into prediction sets guaranteed to include the true label with any user-specified probability. However, same as the model itself, CP is vulnerable to adversarial test examples (evasion) and perturbed calibration data (poisoning). We derive provably robust sets by bounding the worst-case change in conformity scores. Our tighter bounds lead to more efficient sets. We cover both continuous and discrete (sparse) data and our guarantees work both for evasion and poisoning attacks (on both features and labels).

Read more

7/15/2024