AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset

Read original: arXiv:2404.02429 - Published 4/4/2024 by Dongsu Lee, Chanin Eom, Minhae Kwon
Total Score

0

AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces AD4RL, a set of benchmarks for evaluating offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in the context of autonomous driving.
  • The benchmarks are built upon a large-scale dataset of human driving demonstrations, providing a realistic environment to assess the performance of value-based RL models.
  • The authors propose several challenging tasks, including lane following, intersection navigation, and highway driving, to comprehensively evaluate the capabilities of RL agents.

Plain English Explanation

The paper proposes a new set of benchmarks for testing autonomous driving systems that use a particular machine learning approach called offline reinforcement learning (RL). Offline RL is a technique where the system learns from a pre-existing dataset of driving demonstrations, rather than learning directly from interactions with the environment.

The benchmarks are designed to mimic real-world driving scenarios, such as lane following, navigating intersections, and highway driving. By providing a diverse set of tasks, the researchers aim to thoroughly evaluate the performance and capabilities of RL models in the autonomous driving domain.

The key innovation is the use of a large dataset of human driving demonstrations as the basis for the benchmarks. This allows the RL models to learn from realistic driving behavior, rather than being trained in a simulated or artificial environment. The hope is that this will lead to more robust and reliable autonomous driving systems that can better handle the complexities of real-world driving.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces AD4RL, a set of benchmarks for evaluating offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in the context of autonomous driving. The benchmarks are built upon a large-scale dataset of human driving demonstrations, providing a realistic environment to assess the performance of value-based RL models.

The authors propose several challenging tasks, including lane following, intersection navigation, and highway driving, to comprehensively evaluate the capabilities of RL agents. These tasks are designed to test the agents' ability to navigate complex driving scenarios and make decisions based on the observed state of the environment.

The key technical contributions of the paper include:

  1. The design and implementation of the AD4RL benchmark suite, which includes realistic driving environments and a diverse set of tasks.
  2. The use of a large-scale dataset of human driving demonstrations to provide a realistic and challenging training and evaluation environment for RL agents.
  3. The introduction of several evaluation metrics, such as success rate, collision rate, and task completion time, to assess the performance of RL agents on the proposed tasks.

The authors evaluate several state-of-the-art offline RL algorithms on the AD4RL benchmarks and provide a comprehensive analysis of their performance. The results highlight the challenges of applying RL to autonomous driving and the importance of using realistic, value-based datasets for effective training and evaluation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed set of benchmarks for evaluating offline RL algorithms in the context of autonomous driving, which is a valuable contribution to the field. The use of a large-scale dataset of human driving demonstrations as the basis for the benchmarks is a particularly compelling aspect, as it provides a more realistic and challenging environment for RL agents to navigate.

One potential limitation of the work is the focus on value-based RL algorithms, which may not capture the full range of approaches used in autonomous driving research. It would be interesting to see how other RL paradigms, such as policy-based or actor-critic methods, perform on the proposed benchmarks.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much discussion on the potential challenges or limitations of the benchmarks themselves. For example, it would be helpful to understand how well the benchmarks capture the full complexity of real-world driving, or how they might need to be extended or modified to address emerging trends in autonomous driving technology.

Overall, the AD4RL benchmarks represent an important step forward in the evaluation of RL-based autonomous driving systems. The authors have demonstrated a thoughtful and rigorous approach to benchmark design, and their work will likely inspire further research and development in this critical area.

Conclusion

The paper introduces AD4RL, a set of benchmarks for evaluating offline reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in the context of autonomous driving. By leveraging a large-scale dataset of human driving demonstrations, the benchmarks provide a realistic and challenging environment for assessing the performance of value-based RL models.

The proposed benchmarks cover a range of driving scenarios, including lane following, intersection navigation, and highway driving, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of RL agents' capabilities. The authors' technical contributions, such as the benchmark design and the use of value-based datasets, represent an important advancement in the field of autonomous driving research.

While the paper focuses on value-based RL algorithms, the AD4RL benchmarks can potentially be extended to accommodate a wider range of RL approaches, further enhancing their utility and impact. Overall, this work represents a significant step forward in the development of reliable and robust autonomous driving systems, and it is likely to inspire continued research and innovation in this critical domain.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset
Total Score

0

AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset

Dongsu Lee, Chanin Eom, Minhae Kwon

Offline reinforcement learning has emerged as a promising technology by enhancing its practicality through the use of pre-collected large datasets. Despite its practical benefits, most algorithm development research in offline reinforcement learning still relies on game tasks with synthetic datasets. To address such limitations, this paper provides autonomous driving datasets and benchmarks for offline reinforcement learning research. We provide 19 datasets, including real-world human driver's datasets, and seven popular offline reinforcement learning algorithms in three realistic driving scenarios. We also provide a unified decision-making process model that can operate effectively across different scenarios, serving as a reference framework in algorithm design. Our research lays the groundwork for further collaborations in the community to explore practical aspects of existing reinforcement learning methods. Dataset and codes can be found in https://sites.google.com/view/ad4rl.

Read more

4/4/2024

D5RL: Diverse Datasets for Data-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning
Total Score

0

D5RL: Diverse Datasets for Data-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning

Rafael Rafailov, Kyle Hatch, Anikait Singh, Laura Smith, Aviral Kumar, Ilya Kostrikov, Philippe Hansen-Estruch, Victor Kolev, Philip Ball, Jiajun Wu, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine

Offline reinforcement learning algorithms hold the promise of enabling data-driven RL methods that do not require costly or dangerous real-world exploration and benefit from large pre-collected datasets. This in turn can facilitate real-world applications, as well as a more standardized approach to RL research. Furthermore, offline RL methods can provide effective initializations for online finetuning to overcome challenges with exploration. However, evaluating progress on offline RL algorithms requires effective and challenging benchmarks that capture properties of real-world tasks, provide a range of task difficulties, and cover a range of challenges both in terms of the parameters of the domain (e.g., length of the horizon, sparsity of rewards) and the parameters of the data (e.g., narrow demonstration data or broad exploratory data). While considerable progress in offline RL in recent years has been enabled by simpler benchmark tasks, the most widely used datasets are increasingly saturating in performance and may fail to reflect properties of realistic tasks. We propose a new benchmark for offline RL that focuses on realistic simulations of robotic manipulation and locomotion environments, based on models of real-world robotic systems, and comprising a variety of data sources, including scripted data, play-style data collected by human teleoperators, and other data sources. Our proposed benchmark covers state-based and image-based domains, and supports both offline RL and online fine-tuning evaluation, with some of the tasks specifically designed to require both pre-training and fine-tuning. We hope that our proposed benchmark will facilitate further progress on both offline RL and fine-tuning algorithms. Website with code, examples, tasks, and data is available at url{https://sites.google.com/view/d5rl/}

Read more

8/19/2024

Benchmarks for Reinforcement Learning with Biased Offline Data and Imperfect Simulators
Total Score

0

Benchmarks for Reinforcement Learning with Biased Offline Data and Imperfect Simulators

Ori Linial, Guy Tennenholtz, Uri Shalit

In many reinforcement learning (RL) applications one cannot easily let the agent act in the world; this is true for autonomous vehicles, healthcare applications, and even some recommender systems, to name a few examples. Offline RL provides a way to train agents without real-world exploration, but is often faced with biases due to data distribution shifts, limited coverage, and incomplete representation of the environment. To address these issues, practical applications have tried to combine simulators with grounded offline data, using so-called hybrid methods. However, constructing a reliable simulator is in itself often challenging due to intricate system complexities as well as missing or incomplete information. In this work, we outline four principal challenges for combining offline data with imperfect simulators in RL: simulator modeling error, partial observability, state and action discrepancies, and hidden confounding. To help drive the RL community to pursue these problems, we construct ``Benchmarks for Mechanistic Offline Reinforcement Learning'' (B4MRL), which provide dataset-simulator benchmarks for the aforementioned challenges. Our results suggest the key necessity of such benchmarks for future research.

Read more

7/2/2024

A Simulation Benchmark for Autonomous Racing with Large-Scale Human Data
Total Score

0

A Simulation Benchmark for Autonomous Racing with Large-Scale Human Data

Adrian Remonda, Nicklas Hansen, Ayoub Raji, Nicola Musiu, Marko Bertogna, Eduardo Veas, Xiaolong Wang

Despite the availability of international prize-money competitions, scaled vehicles, and simulation environments, research on autonomous racing and the control of sports cars operating close to the limit of handling has been limited by the high costs of vehicle acquisition and management, as well as the limited physics accuracy of open-source simulators. In this paper, we propose a racing simulation platform based on the simulator Assetto Corsa to test, validate, and benchmark autonomous driving algorithms, including reinforcement learning (RL) and classical Model Predictive Control (MPC), in realistic and challenging scenarios. Our contributions include the development of this simulation platform, several state-of-the-art algorithms tailored to the racing environment, and a comprehensive dataset collected from human drivers. Additionally, we evaluate algorithms in the offline RL setting. All the necessary code (including environment and benchmarks), working examples, datasets, and videos are publicly released and can be found at: https://assetto-corsa-gym.github.io

Read more

7/25/2024