ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purification
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Paper presents a new Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model (ADBM) for reliable adversarial purification
- ADBM leverages diffusion models to remove adversarial perturbations from inputs while preserving original information
- Experiments show ADBM outperforms previous adversarial purification methods on benchmark datasets
Plain English Explanation
[object Object] are small, carefully crafted changes to input data that can trick machine learning models into making incorrect predictions. [object Object] is the process of removing these perturbations to restore the original, correct prediction.
The paper introduces a new method called the Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model (ADBM) that uses [object Object] to effectively remove adversarial perturbations. Diffusion models are a type of machine learning model that can generate new data by gradually adding and then removing "noise" from an input.
ADBM leverages this noise removal process to eliminate the adversarial perturbations while preserving the original, uncorrupted information in the input. This allows the model to make accurate predictions on the purified inputs, even in the presence of strong adversarial attacks.
Technical Explanation
The key components of ADBM are:
- Adversarial Diffusion Bridge: ADBM trains a diffusion model to generate "bridge" samples that gradually remove the adversarial perturbations from the input.
- Adversarial Purification Module: This module uses the diffusion bridge to purify the adversarial input and restore the original, correct prediction.
ADBM is evaluated on benchmark [object Object] datasets and shows significant improvements over previous adversarial purification methods. The paper also provides insights into the importance of the diffusion bridge in effectively removing adversarial perturbations.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a novel and promising approach to adversarial purification using diffusion models. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:
- Computational Efficiency: The diffusion-based approach may be computationally more expensive than simpler purification methods, which could limit its practical deployment.
- Generalization to Other Domains: The evaluation is focused on image classification tasks, and further research is needed to assess ADBM's performance on other data types, such as text or speech.
- Robustness to Stronger Attacks: While ADBM demonstrates improvements over prior methods, its ability to withstand emerging, more sophisticated adversarial attacks could be further investigated.
Conclusion
The Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model (ADBM) presents a novel and effective approach to adversarial purification by leveraging the noise removal capabilities of diffusion models. This work advances the field of adversarial robustness and opens up new avenues for exploring diffusion-based techniques to enhance the reliability of machine learning systems in the face of adversarial threats.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ADBM: Adversarial diffusion bridge model for reliable adversarial purification
Xiao Li, Wenxuan Sun, Huanran Chen, Qiongxiu Li, Yining Liu, Yingzhe He, Jie Shi, Xiaolin Hu
Recently Diffusion-based Purification (DiffPure) has been recognized as an effective defense method against adversarial examples. However, we find DiffPure which directly employs the original pre-trained diffusion models for adversarial purification, to be suboptimal. This is due to an inherent trade-off between noise purification performance and data recovery quality. Additionally, the reliability of existing evaluations for DiffPure is questionable, as they rely on weak adaptive attacks. In this work, we propose a novel Adversarial Diffusion Bridge Model, termed ADBM. ADBM directly constructs a reverse bridge from the diffused adversarial data back to its original clean examples, enhancing the purification capabilities of the original diffusion models. Through theoretical analysis and experimental validation across various scenarios, ADBM has proven to be a superior and robust defense mechanism, offering significant promise for practical applications.
Read more8/2/2024
0
Robust Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification
Guang Lin, Zerui Tao, Jianhai Zhang, Toshihisa Tanaka, Qibin Zhao
Diffusion models (DMs) based adversarial purification (AP) has shown to be the most powerful alternative to adversarial training (AT). However, these methods neglect the fact that pre-trained diffusion models themselves are not robust to adversarial attacks as well. Additionally, the diffusion process can easily destroy semantic information and generate a high quality image but totally different from the original input image after the reverse process, leading to degraded standard accuracy. To overcome these issues, a natural idea is to harness adversarial training strategy to retrain or fine-tune the pre-trained diffusion model, which is computationally prohibitive. We propose a novel robust reverse process with adversarial guidance, which is independent of given pre-trained DMs and avoids retraining or fine-tuning the DMs. This robust guidance can not only ensure to generate purified examples retaining more semantic content but also mitigate the accuracy-robustness trade-off of DMs for the first time, which also provides DM-based AP an efficient adaptive ability to new attacks. Extensive experiments are conducted on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and ImageNet to demonstrate that our method achieves the state-of-the-art results and exhibits generalization against different attacks.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Adversarially Robust Industrial Anomaly Detection Through Diffusion Model
Yuanpu Cao, Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen
Deep learning-based industrial anomaly detection models have achieved remarkably high accuracy on commonly used benchmark datasets. However, the robustness of those models may not be satisfactory due to the existence of adversarial examples, which pose significant threats to the practical deployment of deep anomaly detectors. Recently, it has been shown that diffusion models can be used to purify the adversarial noises and thus build a robust classifier against adversarial attacks. Unfortunately, we found that naively applying this strategy in anomaly detection (i.e., placing a purifier before an anomaly detector) will suffer from a high anomaly miss rate since the purifying process can easily remove both the anomaly signal and the adversarial perturbations, causing the later anomaly detector failed to detect anomalies. To tackle this issue, we explore the possibility of performing anomaly detection and adversarial purification simultaneously. We propose a simple yet effective adversarially robust anomaly detection method, textit{AdvRAD}, that allows the diffusion model to act both as an anomaly detector and adversarial purifier. We also extend our proposed method for certified robustness to $l_2$ norm bounded perturbations. Through extensive experiments, we show that our proposed method exhibits outstanding (certified) adversarial robustness while also maintaining equally strong anomaly detection performance on par with the state-of-the-art methods on industrial anomaly detection benchmark datasets.
Read more8/12/2024
🏋️
0
Towards Better Adversarial Purification via Adversarial Denoising Diffusion Training
Yiming Liu, Kezhao Liu, Yao Xiao, Ziyi Dong, Xiaogang Xu, Pengxu Wei, Liang Lin
Recently, diffusion-based purification (DBP) has emerged as a promising approach for defending against adversarial attacks. However, previous studies have used questionable methods to evaluate the robustness of DBP models, their explanations of DBP robustness also lack experimental support. We re-examine DBP robustness using precise gradient, and discuss the impact of stochasticity on DBP robustness. To better explain DBP robustness, we assess DBP robustness under a novel attack setting, Deterministic White-box, and pinpoint stochasticity as the main factor in DBP robustness. Our results suggest that DBP models rely on stochasticity to evade the most effective attack direction, rather than directly countering adversarial perturbations. To improve the robustness of DBP models, we propose Adversarial Denoising Diffusion Training (ADDT). This technique uses Classifier-Guided Perturbation Optimization (CGPO) to generate adversarial perturbation through guidance from a pre-trained classifier, and uses Rank-Based Gaussian Mapping (RBGM) to convert adversarial pertubation into a normal Gaussian distribution. Empirical results show that ADDT improves the robustness of DBP models. Further experiments confirm that ADDT equips DBP models with the ability to directly counter adversarial perturbations.
Read more4/23/2024