Advancements in Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis

Read original: arXiv:2404.07239 - Published 4/12/2024 by Milad Yousefi, Shadi Farabi Maleki, Ali Jafarizadeh, Mahya Ahmadpour Youshanlui, Aida Jafari, Siamak Pedrammehr, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, Pawel Plawiak
Total Score

0

🌀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Thyroid cancer is a growing global health issue that requires advanced diagnostic methods.
  • This review examines the application of AI and radiomics in thyroid cancer diagnosis.
  • The review follows PRISMA guidelines and analyzes 28 studies on the topic.
  • Radiomics analysis using ultrasound (US) images has demonstrated effectiveness in diagnosing thyroid cancer.
  • The literature highlights challenges faced by AI models, including interpretability, dataset constraints, and operator dependence.
  • The review emphasizes the need for standardization and prospective multicenter studies to address these concerns.

Plain English Explanation

Thyroid cancer is a type of cancer that is becoming more common around the world. Doctors need better ways to diagnose this disease. This review looks at how AI (artificial intelligence) and radiomics can be used to help diagnose thyroid cancer.

Radiomics is a technique that uses medical images, like ultrasound scans, to find patterns that could indicate cancer. The researchers reviewed 28 different studies on using AI and radiomics for thyroid cancer diagnosis.

The review found that radiomics analysis of ultrasound images was effective at diagnosing thyroid cancer. Some of the studies even found new strategies that worked better than current methods. However, the researchers also identified some challenges with using AI for this purpose.

For example, it can be hard to understand how the AI models make their decisions. There are also issues with the data used to train the AI, and the results can depend a lot on the person operating the medical equipment. To address these problems, the review suggests that researchers need to work on standardizing the process and doing more large-scale studies.

Overall, the review suggests that AI and radiomics have a lot of potential to improve how doctors diagnose and treat thyroid cancer. But there is still more work to be done to make these techniques reliable and easy to use in a clinical setting.

Technical Explanation

This review follows the PRISMA guidelines to examine the use of AI and radiomics in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The researchers searched multiple databases and identified 267 relevant papers, of which 28 were included in the final analysis.

The reviewed studies demonstrated that radiomics analysis, particularly using ultrasound (US) images, can be effective in diagnosing thyroid cancer. Several of the studies presented new strategies that outperformed existing approaches. However, the literature also highlighted various challenges faced by AI models in this domain.

Some of the key challenges include issues with the interpretability of AI decisions, constraints in the available datasets, and the operator dependence of the imaging process. To address these concerns, the review emphasizes the need for standardization efforts and prospective multicenter studies.

The review also identifies potential solutions, such as advancements in explainable AI technology and the incorporation of personalized medicine techniques. These approaches could help improve the transparency and clinical applicability of AI-based thyroid cancer diagnosis.

Critical Analysis

The review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on the use of AI and radiomics for thyroid cancer diagnosis. The authors have carefully followed the PRISMA guidelines, ensuring a robust and systematic review process.

One of the strengths of the review is its acknowledgment of the various challenges faced by AI models in this domain. The authors rightly highlight the issues of interpretability, dataset constraints, and operator dependence as significant hurdles that need to be addressed.

However, the review could have delved deeper into some of these challenges and provided more concrete suggestions for how to overcome them. For example, the review could have discussed the potential role of CoPilotCAD or other AI-assisted tools in addressing the operator dependence issue.

Additionally, the review could have explored the potential impact of bootstrapping techniques on addressing the dataset constraints, or the feasibility of using AI-powered adverse drug event prediction methods to enhance the safety and efficacy of thyroid cancer treatments.

Overall, the review provides a valuable synthesis of the current research, but could be strengthened by a more in-depth discussion of the specific challenges and potential solutions identified in the literature.

Conclusion

This review highlights the promising potential of AI and radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer, a growing global health concern. The analysis of 28 studies demonstrates the effectiveness of radiomics-based approaches, particularly using ultrasound imaging, in improving the accuracy of thyroid cancer detection.

However, the review also emphasizes the need to address several key challenges, such as the interpretability of AI models, the limitations of available datasets, and the operator dependence of the imaging process. Addressing these concerns through standardization efforts, prospective multicenter studies, and advancements in explainable AI and personalized medicine techniques could significantly enhance the clinical applicability and impact of these technologies.

As the field of AI-assisted medical diagnosis continues to evolve, this review serves as a valuable resource for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers interested in leveraging innovative approaches to improve patient outcomes and diagnostic precision in the management of thyroid cancer.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌀

Total Score

0

Advancements in Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis

Milad Yousefi, Shadi Farabi Maleki, Ali Jafarizadeh, Mahya Ahmadpour Youshanlui, Aida Jafari, Siamak Pedrammehr, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Ryszard Tadeusiewicz, Pawel Plawiak

Thyroid cancer is an increasing global health concern that requires advanced diagnostic methods. The application of AI and radiomics to thyroid cancer diagnosis is examined in this review. A review of multiple databases was conducted in compliance with PRISMA guidelines until October 2023. A combination of keywords led to the discovery of an English academic publication on thyroid cancer and related subjects. 267 papers were returned from the original search after 109 duplicates were removed. Relevant studies were selected according to predetermined criteria after 124 articles were eliminated based on an examination of their abstract and title. After the comprehensive analysis, an additional six studies were excluded. Among the 28 included studies, radiomics analysis, which incorporates ultrasound (US) images, demonstrated its effectiveness in diagnosing thyroid cancer. Various results were noted, some of the studies presenting new strategies that outperformed the status quo. The literature has emphasized various challenges faced by AI models, including interpretability issues, dataset constraints, and operator dependence. The synthesized findings of the 28 included studies mentioned the need for standardization efforts and prospective multicenter studies to address these concerns. Furthermore, approaches to overcome these obstacles were identified, such as advances in explainable AI technology and personalized medicine techniques. The review focuses on how AI and radiomics could transform the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancer. Despite challenges, future research on multidisciplinary cooperation, clinical applicability validation, and algorithm improvement holds the potential to improve patient outcomes and diagnostic precision in the treatment of thyroid cancer.

Read more

4/12/2024

🖼️

Total Score

0

An updated overview of radiomics-based artificial intelligence (AI) methods in breast cancer screening and diagnosis

Reza Elahi, Mahdis Nazari

Current imaging methods for diagnosing BC are associated with limited sensitivity and specificity and modest positive predictive power. The recent progress in image analysis using artificial intelligence (AI) has created great promise to improve breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and subtype differentiation. In this case, novel quantitative computational methods, such as radiomics, have been developed to improve the sensitivity and specificity of early BC diagnosis and classification. The potential of radiomics in improving the diagnostic efficacy of imaging studies has been shown in several studies. In this review article, we discuss the radiomics workflow and current hand-crafted radiomics methods in the diagnosis and classification of BC based on most recent studies on different imaging modalities, e.g. MRI, mammography, contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM), ultrasound imaging, and digital breast tumosynthesis (DBT). We also discuss current challenges and potential strategies to improve the specificity and sensitivity of radiomics in breast cancer to help achieve a higher level of BC classification and diagnosis in the clinical setting. The growing field of AI incorporation with imaging information has opened a great opportunity to provide a higher level of care for BC patients.

Read more

6/24/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines

Douwe J. Spaanderman (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Matthew Marzetti (Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds, UK), Xinyi Wan (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Andrew F. Scarsbrook (Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, UK), Philip Robinson (Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK), Edwin H. G. Oei (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Jacob J. Visser (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Robert Hemke (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), Kirsten van Langevelde (Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands), David F. Hanff (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Geert J. L. H. van Leenders (Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Cornelis Verhoef (Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Dirk J. Gruuhagen (Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Wiro J. Niessen (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands), Stefan Klein (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), Martijn P. A. Starmans (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands)

Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods. The review covered literature from several bibliographic databases, including papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research in peer-reviewed journals focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosing or prognosing primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers for eligibility. Eligible papers were assessed against guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9$pm$7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1$pm$2.1 out of 30. Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. define unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. build on previous work, explainability), evaluation (e.g. evaluating and addressing biases, evaluating AI against best practices), and data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.

Read more

8/23/2024

Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques
Total Score

0

Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Exploration of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Techniques

Samita Bai, Sidra Nasir, Rizwan Ahmed Khan, Sheeraz Arif, Alexandre Meyer, Hubert Konik

Breast cancer (BC) stands as one of the most common malignancies affecting women worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic methodologies for better clinical outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive exploration of the application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies continue to permeate the healthcare sector, particularly in oncology, the need for transparent and interpretable models becomes imperative to enhance clinical decision-making and patient care. This review discusses the integration of various XAI approaches, such as SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, and others, with machine learning and deep learning models utilized in breast cancer detection and classification. By investigating the modalities of breast cancer datasets, including mammograms, ultrasounds and their processing with AI, the paper highlights how XAI can lead to more accurate diagnoses and personalized treatment plans. It also examines the challenges in implementing these techniques and the importance of developing standardized metrics for evaluating XAI's effectiveness in clinical settings. Through detailed analysis and discussion, this article aims to highlight the potential of XAI in bridging the gap between complex AI models and practical healthcare applications, thereby fostering trust and understanding among medical professionals and improving patient outcomes.

Read more

6/4/2024