AEGIS: Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation with Ensemble of LLM Experts
2404.05993
0
0
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI become more widespread, the content safety risks associated with their use also increase. We find a notable deficiency in high-quality content safety datasets and benchmarks that comprehensively cover a wide range of critical safety areas. To address this, we define a broad content safety risk taxonomy, comprising 13 critical risk and 9 sparse risk categories. Additionally, we curate AEGISSAFETYDATASET, a new dataset of approximately 26, 000 human-LLM interaction instances, complete with human annotations adhering to the taxonomy. We plan to release this dataset to the community to further research and to help benchmark LLM models for safety. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the dataset, we instruction-tune multiple LLM-based safety models. We show that our models (named AEGISSAFETYEXPERTS), not only surpass or perform competitively with the state-of-the-art LLM-based safety models and general purpose LLMs, but also exhibit robustness across multiple jail-break attack categories. We also show how using AEGISSAFETYDATASET during the LLM alignment phase does not negatively impact the performance of the aligned models on MT Bench scores. Furthermore, we propose AEGIS, a novel application of a no-regret online adaptation framework with strong theoretical guarantees, to perform content moderation with an ensemble of LLM content safety experts in deployment
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a novel system called Aegis for online adaptive AI content safety moderation using an ensemble of large language model (LLM) experts
- Aims to address the challenges of maintaining content safety as AI systems become more advanced and prevalent
- Introduces a content safety risk taxonomy and policy to guide the development and deployment of Aegis
Plain English Explanation
Aegis is a new system designed to help keep online content safe as AI technology becomes more advanced. The researchers recognized that as powerful AI language models become more widely used, there is a growing need to ensure these systems don't produce harmful or inappropriate content.
To address this, Aegis uses an ensemble of specialized AI experts, each trained to detect different types of risky or unsafe content. These experts work together to continuously monitor and moderate content in an adaptive way, adjusting to changing patterns and new types of potential harms.
The researchers also developed a framework to categorize different content safety risks, and used this to guide the development of Aegis and establish policies for its use. This helps ensure the system is deployed in a responsible and effective manner.
The goal of Aegis is to provide a robust and flexible solution for maintaining content safety as AI technology continues to evolve and become more prevalent online. By using an ensemble approach and a structured risk taxonomy, the researchers aim to stay ahead of emerging challenges in this important area.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel system called Aegis for online adaptive AI content safety moderation. Aegis is designed to address the growing challenge of maintaining content safety as large language models (LLMs) and other advanced AI systems become more widely deployed.
At the core of Aegis is an ensemble of specialized LLM experts, each trained to detect specific types of content risks, such as hate speech, misinformation, or explicit material. These experts work together to continuously monitor and moderate content, with the ensemble adjusting in real-time to adapt to changing patterns and emerging threats.
To guide the development and deployment of Aegis, the researchers also propose a comprehensive content safety risk taxonomy and policy framework. This taxonomy categorizes different types of content risks, from legal and ethical violations to potential societal harms. The associated policy outlines principles and guidelines for responsibly leveraging Aegis and similar AI-powered content moderation systems.
Through this integrated approach of an adaptive LLM ensemble and a structured risk management framework, the authors aim to create a more robust and future-proof solution for content safety moderation. By anticipating and addressing the evolving challenges posed by advanced AI, the Aegis system seeks to help maintain a safer and more trustworthy online environment.
Critical Analysis
The Aegis paper presents a thoughtful and multi-faceted approach to the critical challenge of content safety moderation in the age of large language models and other sophisticated AI systems. The authors' development of a content safety risk taxonomy and accompanying policy framework is a valuable contribution, as it provides a structured way to identify, categorize, and address different types of potential harms.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical challenges of implementing and scaling such a system in the real world. Questions remain about the computational and financial resources required, the ability to keep the ensemble of LLM experts up-to-date, and the potential for bias and errors in the AI-powered moderation process. The authors also do not address how Aegis would handle edge cases or novel types of content risks that may emerge in the future.
Additionally, while the paper acknowledges the need for human oversight and collaboration, it does not provide a detailed exploration of how Aegis would integrate with human moderators and content creators. The role of transparency and accountability in such a system is also an area that could benefit from further discussion.
Overall, the Aegis framework represents an important step forward in addressing a critical challenge facing the broader AI safety and alignment community. However, additional research and real-world testing will be necessary to fully validate the approach and address the practical complexities of deployment at scale.
Conclusion
The Aegis paper presents a promising solution for maintaining content safety as AI systems, particularly large language models, become more advanced and widely used. By employing an ensemble of specialized LLM experts and a structured risk taxonomy and policy framework, the authors aim to create a robust and adaptive system for online content moderation.
While the paper highlights the key components and potential benefits of the Aegis approach, it also raises important questions about the practical challenges of implementation and deployment. Continued research and collaboration between AI developers, content creators, and other stakeholders will be crucial to further refine and improve content safety systems like Aegis.
As AI technology continues to evolve, the need for responsible and effective content moderation solutions will only grow more pressing. The Aegis framework represents a step in the right direction, but ongoing efforts to address AI safety and alignment challenges will be essential to ensure a safer and more trustworthy online environment for all.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Framework for Real-time Safeguarding the Text Generation of Large Language
Ximing Dong, Dayi Lin, Shaowei Wang, Ahmed E. Hassan
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing (NLP) tasks but also pose ethical and societal risks due to their propensity to generate harmful content. To address this, various approaches have been developed to safeguard LLMs from producing unsafe content. However, existing methods have limitations, including the need for training specific control models and proactive intervention during text generation, that lead to quality degradation and increased computational overhead. To mitigate those limitations, we propose LLMSafeGuard, a lightweight framework to safeguard LLM text generation in real-time. LLMSafeGuard integrates an external validator into the beam search algorithm during decoding, rejecting candidates that violate safety constraints while allowing valid ones to proceed. We introduce a similarity based validation approach, simplifying constraint introduction and eliminating the need for control model training. Additionally, LLMSafeGuard employs a context-wise timing selection strategy, intervening LLMs only when necessary. We evaluate LLMSafeGuard on two tasks, detoxification and copyright safeguarding, and demonstrate its superior performance over SOTA baselines. For instance, LLMSafeGuard reduces the average toxic score of. LLM output by 29.7% compared to the best baseline meanwhile preserving similar linguistic quality as natural output in detoxification task. Similarly, in the copyright task, LLMSafeGuard decreases the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) by 56.2% compared to baselines. Moreover, our context-wise timing selection strategy reduces inference time by at least 24% meanwhile maintaining comparable effectiveness as validating each time step. LLMSafeGuard also offers tunable parameters to balance its effectiveness and efficiency.
5/3/2024
SLM as Guardian: Pioneering AI Safety with Small Language Models
Ohjoon Kwon, Donghyeon Jeon, Nayoung Choi, Gyu-Hwung Cho, Changbong Kim, Hyunwoo Lee, Inho Kang, Sun Kim, Taiwoo Park
0
0
Most prior safety research of large language models (LLMs) has focused on enhancing the alignment of LLMs to better suit the safety requirements of humans. However, internalizing such safeguard features into larger models brought challenges of higher training cost and unintended degradation of helpfulness. To overcome such challenges, a modular approach employing a smaller LLM to detect harmful user queries is regarded as a convenient solution in designing LLM-based system with safety requirements. In this paper, we leverage a smaller LLM for both harmful query detection and safeguard response generation. We introduce our safety requirements and the taxonomy of harmfulness categories, and then propose a multi-task learning mechanism fusing the two tasks into a single model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, providing on par or surpassing harmful query detection and safeguard response performance compared to the publicly available LLMs.
5/31/2024
🤖
Current state of LLM Risks and AI Guardrails
Suriya Ganesh Ayyamperumal, Limin Ge
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly sophisticated, leading to widespread deployment in sensitive applications where safety and reliability are paramount. However, LLMs have inherent risks accompanying them, including bias, potential for unsafe actions, dataset poisoning, lack of explainability, hallucinations, and non-reproducibility. These risks necessitate the development of guardrails to align LLMs with desired behaviors and mitigate potential harm. This work explores the risks associated with deploying LLMs and evaluates current approaches to implementing guardrails and model alignment techniques. We examine intrinsic and extrinsic bias evaluation methods and discuss the importance of fairness metrics for responsible AI development. The safety and reliability of agentic LLMs (those capable of real-world actions) are explored, emphasizing the need for testability, fail-safes, and situational awareness. Technical strategies for securing LLMs are presented, including a layered protection model operating at external, secondary, and internal levels. System prompts, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architectures, and techniques to minimize bias and protect privacy are highlighted. Effective guardrail design requires a deep understanding of the LLM's intended use case, relevant regulations, and ethical considerations. Striking a balance between competing requirements, such as accuracy and privacy, remains an ongoing challenge. This work underscores the importance of continuous research and development to ensure the safe and responsible use of LLMs in real-world applications.
6/21/2024
ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
Simone Tedeschi, Felix Friedrich, Patrick Schramowski, Kristian Kersting, Roberto Navigli, Huu Nguyen, Bo Li
0
0
When building Large Language Models (LLMs), it is paramount to bear safety in mind and protect them with guardrails. Indeed, LLMs should never generate content promoting or normalizing harmful, illegal, or unethical behavior that may contribute to harm to individuals or society. This principle applies to both normal and adversarial use. In response, we introduce ALERT, a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It is designed to evaluate the safety of LLMs through red teaming methodologies and consists of more than 45k instructions categorized using our novel taxonomy. By subjecting LLMs to adversarial testing scenarios, ALERT aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models. Furthermore, the fine-grained taxonomy enables researchers to perform an in-depth evaluation that also helps one to assess the alignment with various policies. In our experiments, we extensively evaluate 10 popular open- and closed-source LLMs and demonstrate that many of them still struggle to attain reasonable levels of safety.
6/26/2024