ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming
2404.08676
0
0
Abstract
When building Large Language Models (LLMs), it is paramount to bear safety in mind and protect them with guardrails. Indeed, LLMs should never generate content promoting or normalizing harmful, illegal, or unethical behavior that may contribute to harm to individuals or society. This principle applies to both normal and adversarial use. In response, we introduce ALERT, a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It is designed to evaluate the safety of LLMs through red teaming methodologies and consists of more than 45k instructions categorized using our novel taxonomy. By subjecting LLMs to adversarial testing scenarios, ALERT aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models. Furthermore, the fine-grained taxonomy enables researchers to perform an in-depth evaluation that also helps one to assess the alignment with various policies. In our experiments, we extensively evaluate 10 popular open- and closed-source LLMs and demonstrate that many of them still struggle to attain reasonable levels of safety.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a new "ALERT" benchmark to comprehensively assess the safety of large language models (LLMs) through red teaming
- Introduces a novel taxonomy of safety risks, including harms, misuse, and ethical issues
- Evaluates several prominent LLMs against the ALERT benchmark, identifying key vulnerabilities and safety challenges
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new assessment framework called "ALERT" that is designed to thoroughly evaluate the safety of large language models (LLMs) - AI systems that can generate human-like text. The ALERT benchmark uses a "red teaming" approach, where researchers try to find ways that the models could be misused or cause harm, in order to uncover potential safety issues.
The researchers first developed a detailed taxonomy of different types of safety risks, including direct harms (e.g., encouraging violence), misuse (e.g., cheating on exams), and broader ethical concerns (e.g., perpetuating biases). They then applied this framework to test several well-known LLMs, uncovering a range of vulnerabilities.
For example, the models were found to sometimes generate content that promotes self-harm, provides instructions for illegal activities, or exhibits prejudiced views. The paper argues that these safety risks need to be rigorously addressed as LLMs become more powerful and widespread.
By creating a comprehensive benchmark like ALERT, the researchers hope to spur further research and development of "safe and responsible" LLMs that can be deployed reliably without causing unintended harms. This links to the paper "Developing Safe and Responsible Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Approach"
Technical Explanation
The key elements of the ALERT benchmark are:
-
Taxonomy of Safety Risks: The researchers developed a detailed taxonomy that categorizes different types of potential safety issues, including harms (e.g., inciting violence), misuse (e.g., generating misinformation), and ethical concerns (e.g., perpetuating biases).
-
Red Teaming Methodology: The ALERT framework uses a "red teaming" approach, where researchers systematically attempt to find ways that the LLMs could be misused or cause harm. This involves prompting the models with a diverse set of test cases designed to uncover vulnerabilities.
-
Benchmark Evaluation: The researchers applied the ALERT benchmark to evaluate the safety of several prominent LLMs, including GPT-3, GPT-Neo, and Chinchilla. They analyzed the models' responses across the different safety risk categories in the taxonomy.
The results of the ALERT benchmark evaluation revealed a range of vulnerabilities in the tested LLMs. For example, the models sometimes generated content that promoted self-harm, provided instructions for illegal activities, or exhibited prejudiced views. This links to the paper "Online Safety Analysis: A Benchmark for Assessing the Path Towards Safer Large Language Models"
The researchers argue that these safety challenges need to be rigorously addressed as LLMs become more powerful and ubiquitous. They propose the ALERT benchmark as a tool to drive further research and development of "safe and responsible" LLMs. This links to the paper "SafetyPrompts: A Systematic Review of Open Datasets and Approaches for Evaluating and Improving the Safety of Large Language Models"
Critical Analysis
The ALERT benchmark is a valuable contribution to the field of LLM safety, as it provides a comprehensive framework for identifying and addressing a wide range of potential risks. However, the paper acknowledges some limitations:
- The taxonomy of safety risks may not be exhaustive, and new types of risks could emerge as LLMs continue to advance.
- The red teaming methodology relies on researchers' creativity and ingenuity to design effective test cases, which could introduce biases or miss certain vulnerabilities.
- The evaluation was limited to a handful of LLMs, and the safety profiles of other models may differ.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the technical details of how the LLMs were modified or fine-tuned to improve their safety. This links to the paper "Exploring the Safety and Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models"
Further research is needed to address these limitations and develop more robust and comprehensive approaches to LLM safety. The ALERT benchmark, however, represents an important step forward in this critical area of AI safety and ethics. This links to the paper "AEGIS: An Online Adaptive AI Content Safety Moderation System"
Conclusion
The paper presents a new ALERT benchmark that provides a comprehensive framework for assessing the safety of large language models (LLMs) through a rigorous red teaming approach. By developing a detailed taxonomy of safety risks and applying it to evaluate several prominent LLMs, the researchers have uncovered a range of vulnerabilities that need to be addressed as these powerful AI systems become more widely deployed.
The ALERT benchmark represents a significant contribution to the growing field of AI safety, as it offers a systematic way to identify and mitigate potential harms, misuse, and ethical concerns associated with LLMs. The findings from this research highlight the importance of developing "safe and responsible" LLMs that can be reliably used without causing unintended negative consequences.
Overall, the ALERT benchmark and the insights it provides are crucial for ensuring that the rapid advancements in large language models are accompanied by equally robust efforts to ensure their safe and responsible development and deployment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Learning diverse attacks on large language models for robust red-teaming and safety tuning
Seanie Lee, Minsu Kim, Lynn Cherif, David Dobre, Juho Lee, Sung Ju Hwang, Kenji Kawaguchi, Gauthier Gidel, Yoshua Bengio, Nikolay Malkin, Moksh Jain
0
0
Red-teaming, or identifying prompts that elicit harmful responses, is a critical step in ensuring the safe and responsible deployment of large language models (LLMs). Developing effective protection against many modes of attack prompts requires discovering diverse attacks. Automated red-teaming typically uses reinforcement learning to fine-tune an attacker language model to generate prompts that elicit undesirable responses from a target LLM, as measured, for example, by an auxiliary toxicity classifier. We show that even with explicit regularization to favor novelty and diversity, existing approaches suffer from mode collapse or fail to generate effective attacks. As a flexible and probabilistically principled alternative, we propose to use GFlowNet fine-tuning, followed by a secondary smoothing phase, to train the attacker model to generate diverse and effective attack prompts. We find that the attacks generated by our method are effective against a wide range of target LLMs, both with and without safety tuning, and transfer well between target LLMs. Finally, we demonstrate that models safety-tuned using a dataset of red-teaming prompts generated by our method are robust to attacks from other RL-based red-teaming approaches.
5/30/2024
💬
All Languages Matter: On the Multilingual Safety of Large Language Models
Wenxuan Wang, Zhaopeng Tu, Chang Chen, Youliang Yuan, Jen-tse Huang, Wenxiang Jiao, Michael R. Lyu
0
0
Safety lies at the core of developing and deploying large language models (LLMs). However, previous safety benchmarks only concern the safety in one language, e.g. the majority language in the pretraining data such as English. In this work, we build the first multilingual safety benchmark for LLMs, XSafety, in response to the global deployment of LLMs in practice. XSafety covers 14 kinds of commonly used safety issues across 10 languages that span several language families. We utilize XSafety to empirically study the multilingual safety for 4 widely-used LLMs, including both close-API and open-source models. Experimental results show that all LLMs produce significantly more unsafe responses for non-English queries than English ones, indicating the necessity of developing safety alignment for non-English languages. In addition, we propose several simple and effective prompting methods to improve the multilingual safety of ChatGPT by evoking safety knowledge and improving cross-lingual generalization of safety alignment. Our prompting method can significantly reduce the ratio of unsafe responses from 19.1% to 9.7% for non-English queries. We release our data at https://github.com/Jarviswang94/Multilingual_safety_benchmark.
6/21/2024
Developing Safe and Responsible Large Language Models -- A Comprehensive Framework
Shaina Raza, Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Shardul Ghuge, Fatemeh Tavakol, Deepak John Reji, Syed Raza Bashir
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced various NLP tasks. However, these models often risk generating unsafe text that perpetuates biases. Current approaches to produce unbiased outputs from LLMs can reduce biases but at the expense of knowledge retention. In this research, we address the question of whether producing safe (unbiased) outputs through LLMs can retain knowledge and language understanding. In response, we developed the Safety and Responsible Large Language Model (textbf{SR}$_{text{LLM}}$), an LLM that has been instruction fine-tuned on top of already safe LLMs (e.g., Llama2 or related) to diminish biases in generated text. To achieve our goals, we compiled a specialized dataset designed to train our model in identifying and correcting biased text. We conduct experiments, both on this custom data and out-of-distribution test sets, to show the bias reduction and knowledge retention. The results confirm that textbf{SR}$_{text{LLM}}$ outperforms traditional fine-tuning and prompting methods in both reducing biases and preserving the integrity of language knowledge. The significance of our findings lies in demonstrating that instruction fine-tuning can provide a more robust solution for bias reduction in LLMs. We have made our code and data available at href{https://github.com/shainarazavi/Safe-Responsible-LLM}{Safe-LLM}.
7/2/2024
💬
MM-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models
Xin Liu, Yichen Zhu, Jindong Gu, Yunshi Lan, Chao Yang, Yu Qiao
0
0
The security concerns surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) have been extensively explored, yet the safety of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remains understudied. In this paper, we observe that Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can be easily compromised by query-relevant images, as if the text query itself were malicious. To address this, we introduce MM-SafetyBench, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety-critical evaluations of MLLMs against such image-based manipulations. We have compiled a dataset comprising 13 scenarios, resulting in a total of 5,040 text-image pairs. Our analysis across 12 state-of-the-art models reveals that MLLMs are susceptible to breaches instigated by our approach, even when the equipped LLMs have been safety-aligned. In response, we propose a straightforward yet effective prompting strategy to enhance the resilience of MLLMs against these types of attacks. Our work underscores the need for a concerted effort to strengthen and enhance the safety measures of open-source MLLMs against potential malicious exploits. The resource is available at https://github.com/isXinLiu/MM-SafetyBench
6/21/2024