AER-LLM: Ambiguity-aware Emotion Recognition Leveraging Large Language Models
0
👁️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great success in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks.
- Exploring LLMs' capabilities in emotional intelligence is crucial for more natural and empathetic conversational AI.
- Previous studies have focused on single emotion labels, overlooking the complex and ambiguous nature of human emotions.
- This study addresses this gap by exploring LLMs' potential in recognizing ambiguous emotions, leveraging their strong generalization and in-context learning capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. In addition to their impressive cognitive abilities, researchers are also exploring how well these models can recognize and respond to human emotions. This is important for creating conversational AI systems that can engage with people in a more natural and empathetic way.
Previous research has shown that LLMs can recognize basic emotions, like happiness or sadness. However, human emotions are often more complex and ambiguous, with a mix of different feelings. This study is the first to investigate whether LLMs can recognize these more nuanced and ambiguous emotional states.
The researchers designed experiments to test how well LLMs can identify ambiguous emotions, both with and without additional context information from previous conversations. The results suggest that LLMs have significant potential in this area, and that including conversational context can further improve their emotion recognition capabilities. This is an exciting development, as it indicates that LLMs may be able to understand and respond to human emotions in a way that parallels our own perceptual abilities.
Technical Explanation
This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) in recognizing ambiguous emotions, leveraging their strong generalization capabilities and in-context learning. The researchers designed zero-shot and few-shot prompting approaches, and incorporated past dialogue as context information to enhance ambiguous emotion recognition.
Experiments were conducted using three datasets, and the results indicate that LLMs demonstrate significant potential in recognizing ambiguous emotions. The inclusion of context information, such as past dialogue, was found to provide substantial benefits for the models' emotion recognition performance.
Furthermore, the research findings suggest that LLMs exhibit a high degree of effectiveness in recognizing less ambiguous emotions, and also show potential for identifying more ambiguous emotional states, mirroring human perceptual capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The study's focus on ambiguous emotion recognition is a valuable contribution, as it addresses a key limitation of previous research that often relied on single emotion labels. By exploring LLMs' ability to handle the complex and nuanced nature of human emotions, this work takes an important step towards developing more natural and empathetic conversational AI.
However, the paper acknowledges that the datasets used in the experiments may not fully capture the full range and complexity of human emotional experiences. Additional research with more diverse and realistic datasets would be beneficial to further validate the findings and explore the limitations of LLMs in this domain.
Another potential area for further investigation is the interpretability and transparency of the LLMs' emotion recognition process. Understanding how these models arrive at their emotional assessments could provide valuable insights and inform the development of more trustworthy and accountable conversational AI systems.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the significant potential of large language models in recognizing ambiguous emotions, a key capability for developing more natural and empathetic conversational AI. By leveraging LLMs' strong generalization and in-context learning abilities, the researchers have made an important contribution to the field of emotional intelligence in artificial intelligence.
The findings suggest that LLMs can not only effectively recognize less ambiguous emotions, but also exhibit potential for identifying more complex and nuanced emotional states, mirroring human perceptual capabilities. This represents an exciting step forward in the pursuit of AI systems that can engage with people in a more empathetic and intuitive manner, with far-reaching implications for various applications, from customer service to mental health support.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
0
AER-LLM: Ambiguity-aware Emotion Recognition Leveraging Large Language Models
Xin Hong, Yuan Gong, Vidhyasaharan Sethu, Ting Dang
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated great success in many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. In addition to their cognitive intelligence, exploring their capabilities in emotional intelligence is also crucial, as it enables more natural and empathetic conversational AI. Recent studies have shown LLMs' capability in recognizing emotions, but they often focus on single emotion labels and overlook the complex and ambiguous nature of human emotions. This study is the first to address this gap by exploring the potential of LLMs in recognizing ambiguous emotions, leveraging their strong generalization capabilities and in-context learning. We design zero-shot and few-shot prompting and incorporate past dialogue as context information for ambiguous emotion recognition. Experiments conducted using three datasets indicate significant potential for LLMs in recognizing ambiguous emotions, and highlight the substantial benefits of including context information. Furthermore, our findings indicate that LLMs demonstrate a high degree of effectiveness in recognizing less ambiguous emotions and exhibit potential for identifying more ambiguous emotions, paralleling human perceptual capabilities.
Read more9/30/2024
💬
0
Modeling Emotions and Ethics with Large Language Models
Edward Y. Chang
This paper explores the integration of human-like emotions and ethical considerations into Large Language Models (LLMs). We first model eight fundamental human emotions, presented as opposing pairs, and employ collaborative LLMs to reinterpret and express these emotions across a spectrum of intensity. Our focus extends to embedding a latent ethical dimension within LLMs, guided by a novel self-supervised learning algorithm with human feedback (SSHF). This approach enables LLMs to perform self-evaluations and adjustments concerning ethical guidelines, enhancing their capability to generate content that is not only emotionally resonant but also ethically aligned. The methodologies and case studies presented herein illustrate the potential of LLMs to transcend mere text and image generation, venturing into the realms of empathetic interaction and principled decision-making, thereby setting a new precedent in the development of emotionally aware and ethically conscious AI systems.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Recent Advancement of Emotion Cognition in Large Language Models
Yuyan Chen, Yanghua Xiao
Emotion cognition in large language models (LLMs) is crucial for enhancing performance across various applications, such as social media, human-computer interaction, and mental health assessment. We explore the current landscape of research, which primarily revolves around emotion classification, emotionally rich response generation, and Theory of Mind assessments, while acknowledge the challenges like dependency on annotated data and complexity in emotion processing. In this paper, we present a detailed survey of recent progress in LLMs for emotion cognition. We explore key research studies, methodologies, outcomes, and resources, aligning them with Ulric Neisser's cognitive stages. Additionally, we outline potential future directions for research in this evolving field, including unsupervised learning approaches and the development of more complex and interpretable emotion cognition LLMs. We also discuss advanced methods such as contrastive learning used to improve LLMs' emotion cognition capabilities.
Read more9/23/2024
0
Do Large Language Models Possess Sensitive to Sentiment?
Yang Liu, Xichou Zhu, Zhou Shen, Yi Liu, Min Li, Yujun Chen, Benzi John, Zhenzhen Ma, Tao Hu, Zhi Li, Zhiyang Xu, Wei Luo, Junhui Wang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently displayed their extraordinary capabilities in language understanding. However, how to comprehensively assess the sentiment capabilities of LLMs continues to be a challenge. This paper investigates the ability of LLMs to detect and react to sentiment in text modal. As the integration of LLMs into diverse applications is on the rise, it becomes highly critical to comprehend their sensitivity to emotional tone, as it can influence the user experience and the efficacy of sentiment-driven tasks. We conduct a series of experiments to evaluate the performance of several prominent LLMs in identifying and responding appropriately to sentiments like positive, negative, and neutral emotions. The models' outputs are analyzed across various sentiment benchmarks, and their responses are compared with human evaluations. Our discoveries indicate that although LLMs show a basic sensitivity to sentiment, there are substantial variations in their accuracy and consistency, emphasizing the requirement for further enhancements in their training processes to better capture subtle emotional cues. Take an example in our findings, in some cases, the models might wrongly classify a strongly positive sentiment as neutral, or fail to recognize sarcasm or irony in the text. Such misclassifications highlight the complexity of sentiment analysis and the areas where the models need to be refined. Another aspect is that different LLMs might perform differently on the same set of data, depending on their architecture and training datasets. This variance calls for a more in-depth study of the factors that contribute to the performance differences and how they can be optimized.
Read more9/24/2024