Affinity-aware Serverless Function Scheduling

Read original: arXiv:2407.14572 - Published 7/23/2024 by Giuseppe De Palma, Saverio Giallorenzo, Jacopo Mauro, Matteo Trentin, Gianluigi Zavattaro
Total Score

0

Affinity-aware Serverless Function Scheduling

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Serverless computing is a cloud computing model where the cloud provider manages the infrastructure and dynamically allocates resources.
  • Serverless functions need to be scheduled efficiently to maximize resource utilization and performance.
  • This paper proposes an "affinity-aware" serverless function scheduling approach that considers the affinity between functions and the underlying hardware.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a technique for scheduling serverless functions in cloud computing environments. In serverless computing, users don't have to manage servers - the cloud provider handles the infrastructure and scales resources up and down as needed.

When a user runs a serverless function, the cloud provider needs to decide which physical server or "node" to run that function on. The key idea in this paper is to try to schedule functions on nodes that have a good "affinity" or compatibility with those functions. This could mean, for example, scheduling a function that does a lot of image processing on a node with a powerful graphics processing unit (GPU).

By considering this affinity between functions and hardware, the scheduling approach can improve overall resource utilization and performance compared to simpler scheduling methods that don't take affinity into account. This can lead to faster execution times for the serverless functions.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an "affinity-aware" serverless function scheduling approach. It first models the affinity between functions and hardware resources like CPUs, GPUs, and memory. This affinity is quantified using metrics like the number of CPU cycles, GPU operations, and memory accesses a function is expected to require.

The scheduling algorithm then uses this affinity information to place each incoming function on the node that has the highest affinity for that function. This is done in a way that also tries to balance the load across all the available nodes.

The paper evaluates this affinity-aware scheduling approach through simulations and comparisons to other scheduling strategies. The results show that it can improve metrics like function execution time and resource utilization compared to simpler scheduling methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a reasonable approach for optimizing serverless function scheduling by considering hardware affinities. However, it does not address some important practical considerations:

  • The overhead and complexity of precisely modeling affinity for each function and node. Collecting this data may be challenging in real-world cloud environments.
  • The sensitivity of the approach to inaccurate affinity estimates. If the affinity modeling is imperfect, it could lead to suboptimal scheduling decisions.
  • The scalability of the centralized scheduling algorithm as the number of functions and nodes grows very large in production cloud deployments.

Further research would be needed to understand how this affinity-aware scheduling approach would perform in large-scale, dynamic cloud environments with heterogeneous hardware and unpredictable workloads.

Conclusion

This paper proposes an innovative serverless function scheduling technique that takes into account the affinity between functions and hardware resources. By considering these affinities, the approach can improve resource utilization and function performance compared to simpler scheduling methods.

While the concept is promising, the practicality and scalability of the approach require further investigation. Addressing the challenges around affinity modeling and centralized scheduling at scale would be important next steps to validate the real-world applicability of this research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Affinity-aware Serverless Function Scheduling
Total Score

0

Affinity-aware Serverless Function Scheduling

Giuseppe De Palma, Saverio Giallorenzo, Jacopo Mauro, Matteo Trentin, Gianluigi Zavattaro

Functions-as-a-Service (FaaS) is a Serverless Cloud paradigm where a platform manages the scheduling (e.g., resource allocation, runtime environments) of stateless functions. Recent developments show the benefits of using domain-specific languages to express per-function policies, e.g., policies can enforce the allocation of functions on nodes that enjoy lower data-access latencies thanks to proximity and connection pooling. Here, we focus on affinity-aware scenarios, i.e., where, for performance and functional requirements, the allocation of a function depends on the presence/absence of other functions on nodes. We first present aAPP, an affinity-aware extension of a declarative, platform-agnostic language for defining custom function scheduling policies. We implement a prototype supporting this scheduling language by extending the popular Apache OpenWhisk FaaS platform and show that using aAPP in affinity-aware scenarios leads to an appreciable reduction in latency without noticeable overhead for scenarios without affinity constraints.

Read more

7/23/2024

Total Score

0

On the Complexity of Reachability Properties in Serverless Function Scheduling

Giuseppe De Palma, Saverio Giallorenzo, Jacopo Mauro, Matteo Trentin, Gianluigi Zavattaro

Functions-as-a-Service (FaaS) is a Serverless Cloud paradigm where a platform manages the execution scheduling (e.g., resource allocation, runtime environments) of stateless functions. Recent developments demonstrate the benefits of using domain-specific languages to express per-function scheduling policies, e.g., enforcing the allocation of functions on nodes that enjoy low data-access latencies thanks to proximity and connection pooling. We present aAPP, an affinity-aware extension of a platform-agnostic function scheduling language. We formalise its scheduling semantics and then study the complexity of statically checking reachability properties, e.g., useful to verify that trusted and untrusted functions cannot be co-located. Analysing different fragments of aAPP, we show that checking reachability of policies without affinity has linear complexity, while affinity makes the problem PSpace.

Read more

7/22/2024

📊

Total Score

0

GeoFF: Federated Serverless Workflows with Data Pre-Fetching

Valentin Carl, Trever Schirmer, Tobias Pfandzelter, David Bermbach

Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) is a popular cloud computing model in which applications are implemented as work flows of multiple independent functions. While cloud providers usually offer composition services for such workflows, they do not support cross-platform workflows forcing developers to hardcode the composition logic. Furthermore, FaaS workflows tend to be slow due to cascading cold starts, inter-function latency, and data download latency on the critical path. In this paper, we propose GeoFF, a serverless choreography middleware that executes FaaS workflows across different public and private FaaS platforms, including ad-hoc workflow recomposition. Furthermore, GeoFF supports function pre-warming and data pre-fetching. This minimizes end-to-end workflow latency by taking cold starts and data download latency off the critical path. In experiments with our proof-of-concept prototype and a realistic application, we were able to reduce end-to-end latency by more than 50%.

Read more

5/24/2024

The State of FaaS: An analysis of public Functions-as-a-Service providers
Total Score

0

The State of FaaS: An analysis of public Functions-as-a-Service providers

Nnamdi Ekwe-Ekwe, Lucas Amos

Serverless computing is a growing and maturing field that is the focus of much research, industry interest and adoption. Previous works exploring Functions-as-a-Service providers have focused primarily on the most well known providers AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions and Microsoft Azure Functions without exploring other providers in similar detail. In this work, we conduct the first detailed review of ten currently publicly available FaaS platforms exploring everything from their history, to their features and pricing to where they sit within the overall public FaaS landscape, before making a number of observations as to the state of the FaaS.

Read more

9/4/2024