Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimization
2406.07107
0
0
Abstract
Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) has been instrumental in improving deep neural network training by minimizing both the training loss and the sharpness of the loss landscape, leading the model into flatter minima that are associated with better generalization properties. In another aspect, Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) is a framework designed to improve the adaptability of models. MAML optimizes a set of meta-models that are specifically tailored for quick adaptation to multiple tasks with minimal fine-tuning steps and can generalize well with limited data. In this work, we explore the connection between SAM and MAML, particularly in terms of enhancing model generalization. We introduce Agnostic-SAM, a novel approach that combines the principles of both SAM and MAML. Agnostic-SAM adapts the core idea of SAM by optimizing the model towards wider local minima using training data, while concurrently maintaining low loss values on validation data. By doing so, it seeks flatter minima that are not only robust to small perturbations but also less vulnerable to data distributional shift problems. Our experimental results demonstrate that Agnostic-SAM significantly improves generalization over baselines across a range of datasets and under challenging conditions such as noisy labels and data limitation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new optimization algorithm called "Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimization" (A-SAM) that aims to improve the quality of features learned by machine learning models.
- A-SAM builds on the idea of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), which was shown to produce models with better generalization and robustness.
- The key innovation in A-SAM is that it can be applied in a wider range of settings, including when the true data distribution is unknown, making it more "agnostic" or flexible.
Plain English Explanation
When training machine learning models, it's important not just to minimize the training error, but also to produce models that generalize well to new, unseen data. One way to do this is through Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), which encourages the model to find parameters that are robust to small perturbations.
However, SAM requires knowing the true data distribution, which is often not the case in practice. This paper introduces a new algorithm called "Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimization" (A-SAM) that can work even when the true data distribution is unknown. A-SAM does this by making fewer assumptions about the data, making it more "agnostic" or flexible.
The key idea behind A-SAM is to find model parameters that not only minimize the training error, but also have low "sharpness" - meaning the model's predictions don't change much when the input is slightly perturbed. This helps the model generalize better and be more robust to real-world variations in the data.
A-SAM builds on the success of SAM, but extends it to work in more general settings where the true data distribution is not known. This makes A-SAM a more versatile and practical optimization algorithm for training high-quality machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) algorithm was previously proposed as a way to train machine learning models that are more robust and generalize better. SAM works by not only minimizing the training loss, but also minimizing the "sharpness" of the model's loss function around the current parameters.
This "sharpness-aware" optimization encourages the model to find parameters that are robust to small perturbations in the input, leading to better generalization. However, SAM requires knowing the true data distribution, which is often not the case in practice.
This paper introduces "Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimization" (A-SAM), which extends the SAM framework to work in more general settings where the true data distribution is unknown. A-SAM does this by making fewer assumptions about the data and instead optimizing for a more "agnostic" notion of sharpness.
Specifically, A-SAM optimizes for the maximum sharpness over a set of perturbations, rather than the expected sharpness as in SAM. This allows A-SAM to work even when the true data distribution is not known. The authors show that A-SAM can be implemented efficiently using stochastic optimization techniques.
The paper also provides theoretical analysis of A-SAM, showing that it enjoys similar generalization guarantees to SAM under certain conditions. Extensive experiments on a variety of datasets and tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of A-SAM in producing models with better generalization and robustness, compared to standard training approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a solid technical contribution by extending the Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) algorithm to work in more general, "agnostic" settings where the true data distribution is unknown. This is an important practical consideration, as in many real-world applications, the true data distribution is not precisely known.
That said, the paper does not address certain limitations of the A-SAM approach. For example, it's not clear how A-SAM would perform in the presence of significant distribution shift or if the set of perturbations used is not representative of the actual variations in the data. Additionally, the computational overhead of A-SAM compared to standard training may be a concern, especially for large-scale models.
Furthermore, the paper focuses primarily on improving generalization and robustness, but does not explore other potential trade-offs, such as the impact on training speed, model complexity, or downstream task performance. A more comprehensive evaluation of A-SAM's strengths and weaknesses across a broader range of metrics would be valuable.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling contribution by introducing a more flexible and practical sharpness-aware optimization algorithm. However, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and broader implications of the A-SAM approach.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a new optimization algorithm called "Agnostic Sharpness-Aware Minimization" (A-SAM) that extends the Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) framework to work in more general settings where the true data distribution is unknown.
A-SAM aims to produce machine learning models with better generalization and robustness by optimizing not just for training loss, but also for a more "agnostic" notion of sharpness that does not rely on knowing the true data distribution. The authors provide theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of A-SAM compared to standard training approaches.
While A-SAM represents an important practical advance, the paper also highlights the need for further research to fully understand the strengths, limitations, and broader implications of this new optimization algorithm. Continued progress in this direction could lead to more reliable and robust machine learning models that can better generalize to real-world data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Sharpness-Aware Minimization Enhances Feature Quality via Balanced Learning
Jacob Mitchell Springer, Vaishnavh Nagarajan, Aditi Raghunathan
0
0
Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has emerged as a promising alternative optimizer to stochastic gradient descent (SGD). The originally-proposed motivation behind SAM was to bias neural networks towards flatter minima that are believed to generalize better. However, recent studies have shown conflicting evidence on the relationship between flatness and generalization, suggesting that flatness does fully explain SAM's success. Sidestepping this debate, we identify an orthogonal effect of SAM that is beneficial out-of-distribution: we argue that SAM implicitly balances the quality of diverse features. SAM achieves this effect by adaptively suppressing well-learned features which gives remaining features opportunity to be learned. We show that this mechanism is beneficial in datasets that contain redundant or spurious features where SGD falls for the simplicity bias and would not otherwise learn all available features. Our insights are supported by experiments on real data: we demonstrate that SAM improves the quality of features in datasets containing redundant or spurious features, including CelebA, Waterbirds, CIFAR-MNIST, and DomainBed.
6/3/2024
Efficient Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Molecular Graph Transformer Models
Yili Wang, Kaixiong Zhou, Ninghao Liu, Ying Wang, Xin Wang
0
0
Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) has received increasing attention in computer vision since it can effectively eliminate the sharp local minima from the training trajectory and mitigate generalization degradation. However, SAM requires two sequential gradient computations during the optimization of each step: one to obtain the perturbation gradient and the other to obtain the updating gradient. Compared with the base optimizer (e.g., Adam), SAM doubles the time overhead due to the additional perturbation gradient. By dissecting the theory of SAM and observing the training gradient of the molecular graph transformer, we propose a new algorithm named GraphSAM, which reduces the training cost of SAM and improves the generalization performance of graph transformer models. There are two key factors that contribute to this result: (i) textit{gradient approximation}: we use the updating gradient of the previous step to approximate the perturbation gradient at the intermediate steps smoothly (textbf{increases efficiency}); (ii) textit{loss landscape approximation}: we theoretically prove that the loss landscape of GraphSAM is limited to a small range centered on the expected loss of SAM (textbf{guarantees generalization performance}). The extensive experiments on six datasets with different tasks demonstrate the superiority of GraphSAM, especially in optimizing the model update process. The code is in:https://github.com/YL-wang/GraphSAM/tree/graphsam
6/21/2024
🏋️
On the Duality Between Sharpness-Aware Minimization and Adversarial Training
Yihao Zhang, Hangzhou He, Jingyu Zhu, Huanran Chen, Yifei Wang, Zeming Wei
0
0
Adversarial Training (AT), which adversarially perturb the input samples during training, has been acknowledged as one of the most effective defenses against adversarial attacks, yet suffers from inevitably decreased clean accuracy. Instead of perturbing the samples, Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) perturbs the model weights during training to find a more flat loss landscape and improve generalization. However, as SAM is designed for better clean accuracy, its effectiveness in enhancing adversarial robustness remains unexplored. In this work, considering the duality between SAM and AT, we investigate the adversarial robustness derived from SAM. Intriguingly, we find that using SAM alone can improve adversarial robustness. To understand this unexpected property of SAM, we first provide empirical and theoretical insights into how SAM can implicitly learn more robust features, and conduct comprehensive experiments to show that SAM can improve adversarial robustness notably without sacrificing any clean accuracy, shedding light on the potential of SAM to be a substitute for AT when accuracy comes at a higher priority. Code is available at https://github.com/weizeming/SAM_AT.
6/6/2024
A Universal Class of Sharpness-Aware Minimization Algorithms
Behrooz Tahmasebi, Ashkan Soleymani, Dara Bahri, Stefanie Jegelka, Patrick Jaillet
0
0
Recently, there has been a surge in interest in developing optimization algorithms for overparameterized models as achieving generalization is believed to require algorithms with suitable biases. This interest centers on minimizing sharpness of the original loss function; the Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) algorithm has proven effective. However, most literature only considers a few sharpness measures, such as the maximum eigenvalue or trace of the training loss Hessian, which may not yield meaningful insights for non-convex optimization scenarios like neural networks. Additionally, many sharpness measures are sensitive to parameter invariances in neural networks, magnifying significantly under rescaling parameters. Motivated by these challenges, we introduce a new class of sharpness measures in this paper, leading to new sharpness-aware objective functions. We prove that these measures are textit{universally expressive}, allowing any function of the training loss Hessian matrix to be represented by appropriate hyperparameters. Furthermore, we show that the proposed objective functions explicitly bias towards minimizing their corresponding sharpness measures, and how they allow meaningful applications to models with parameter invariances (such as scale-invariances). Finally, as instances of our proposed general framework, we present textit{Frob-SAM} and textit{Det-SAM}, which are specifically designed to minimize the Frobenius norm and the determinant of the Hessian of the training loss, respectively. We also demonstrate the advantages of our general framework through extensive experiments.
6/11/2024