Ah, that's the great puzzle: On the Quest of a Holistic Understanding of the Harms of Recommender Systems on Children

2405.02050

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/6/2024 by Robin Ungruh, Maria Soledad Pera

๐Ÿค”

Abstract

Children come across various media items online, many of which are selected by recommender systems (RS) primarily designed for adults. The specific nature of the content selected by RS to display on online platforms used by children - although not necessarily targeting them as a user base - remains largely unknown. This raises questions about whether such content is appropriate given children's vulnerable stages of development and the potential risks to their well-being. In this position paper, we reflect on the relationship between RS and children, emphasizing the possible adverse effects of the content this user group might be exposed to online. As a step towards fostering safer interactions for children in online environments, we advocate for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to undertake a more comprehensive examination of the impact of RS on children - one focused on harms. This would result in a more holistic understanding that could inform the design and deployment of strategies that would better suit children's needs and preferences while actively mitigating the potential harm posed by RS; acknowledging that identifying and addressing these harms is complex and multifaceted.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the relationship between recommender systems (RS) and children, examining the potential risks and adverse effects of the content recommended to this vulnerable user group.
  • It advocates for a more comprehensive examination of the impact of RS on children, focusing on potential harms and the need to design strategies that better suit children's needs and preferences while mitigating these risks.

Plain English Explanation

Online platforms often use recommender systems to suggest content to users. However, these systems are typically designed for adults, and the specific nature of the content they recommend to children is largely unknown. This raises concerns about whether such content is appropriate for children, who are in sensitive stages of development, and the potential risks it may pose to their well-being.

The paper advocates for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to take a closer look at the impact of recommender systems on children. This would involve examining potential harms and developing strategies to mitigate these risks while also addressing children's specific needs and preferences. The goal is to create safer online environments for children by leveraging recommender systems in a way that reduces potential content gaps.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a position on the relationship between recommender systems (RS) and children, emphasizing the possible adverse effects of the content this user group might be exposed to online. The authors argue that although RS are not necessarily designed to target children, the specific nature of the content they recommend to this vulnerable population remains largely unknown.

The paper advocates for a more comprehensive examination of the impact of RS on children, focusing on potential harms. The authors suggest that this would result in a more holistic understanding that could inform the design and deployment of strategies better suited to children's needs and preferences, while actively mitigating the potential harm posed by RS.

The authors acknowledge that identifying and addressing these harms is a complex and multifaceted challenge, requiring the collaboration of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises valid concerns about the potential risks and adverse effects that children may face when exposed to content recommended by systems designed primarily for adults. However, the paper does not provide specific details or examples of the types of harmful content children might be exposed to, which could help strengthen the argument.

Additionally, while the authors call for a more comprehensive examination of the impact of RS on children, they do not offer any concrete suggestions or frameworks for how this research should be conducted. It would be helpful to see the authors propose potential methodologies or approaches that could be used to better understand the relationship between RS and child well-being.

The paper also acknowledges the complexity of this issue, but does not delve into the specific challenges or barriers that may need to be addressed to effectively mitigate the potential harms. Further exploration of these obstacles and how they might be overcome could enhance the overall argument.

Conclusion

This position paper highlights an important and often overlooked issue: the potential risks that children face when exposed to content recommended by adult-oriented recommender systems. By advocating for a more comprehensive examination of this relationship, the authors aim to inform the development of strategies that better protect children's well-being in online environments.

The core message is that the impact of recommender systems on children is a critical area of research that deserves greater attention from the academic community, industry practitioners, and policymakers. Addressing these concerns could lead to the creation of safer and more inclusive online spaces for young users.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Harm Mitigation in Recommender Systems under User Preference Dynamics

Harm Mitigation in Recommender Systems under User Preference Dynamics

Jerry Chee, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Udi Weinsberg, Sarah Dean, Stratis Ioannidis

YC

0

Reddit

0

We consider a recommender system that takes into account the interplay between recommendations, the evolution of user interests, and harmful content. We model the impact of recommendations on user behavior, particularly the tendency to consume harmful content. We seek recommendation policies that establish a tradeoff between maximizing click-through rate (CTR) and mitigating harm. We establish conditions under which the user profile dynamics have a stationary point, and propose algorithms for finding an optimal recommendation policy at stationarity. We experiment on a semi-synthetic movie recommendation setting initialized with real data and observe that our policies outperform baselines at simultaneously maximizing CTR and mitigating harm.

Read more

6/17/2024

Effect of recommending users and opinions on the network connectivity and idea generation process

Effect of recommending users and opinions on the network connectivity and idea generation process

Sriniwas Pandey, Hiroki Sayama

YC

0

Reddit

0

The growing reliance on online services underscores the crucial role of recommendation systems, especially on social media platforms seeking increased user engagement. This study investigates how recommendation systems influence the impact of personal behavioral traits on social network dynamics. It explores the interplay between homophily, users' openness to novel ideas, and recommendation-driven exposure to new opinions. Additionally, the research examines the impact of recommendation systems on the diversity of newly generated ideas, shedding light on the challenges and opportunities in designing effective systems that balance the exploration of new ideas with the risk of reinforcing biases or filtering valuable, unconventional concepts.

Read more

5/24/2024

๐Ÿงช

Designing Child-Centered Content Exposure and Moderation

Bel'en Sald'ias

YC

0

Reddit

0

Research on children's online experience and computer interaction often overlooks the relationship children have with hidden algorithms that control the content they encounter. Furthermore, it is not only about how children interact with targeted content but also how their development and agency are largely affected by these. By engaging with the body of literature at the intersection of i) human-centered design approaches, ii) exclusion and discrimination in A.I., iii) privacy, transparency, and accountability, and iv) children's online citizenship, this article dives into the question of How can we approach the design of a child-centered moderation process to (1) include aspects that families value for their children and (2) provide explanations for content appropriateness and removal so that we can scale (according to systems and human needs) the moderation process assisted by A.I.?. This article contributes a sociotechnical highlight of core challenges and opportunities of designing child-centered content control tools. The article concludes by grounding and characterizing design considerations for a child-centered, family-guided moderation system. We hope this work serves as a stepping stone for designers and researchers pursuing children's safety online with an eye on hidden agents controlling children's online experiences and, by extension, the values and opportunities children are exposed to.

Read more

6/13/2024

๐Ÿค”

Mysterious and Manipulative Black Boxes: A Qualitative Analysis of Perceptions on Recommender Systems

Jukka Ruohonen

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recommender systems are used to provide relevant suggestions on various matters. Although these systems are a classical research topic, knowledge is still limited regarding the public opinion about these systems. Public opinion is also important because the systems are known to cause various problems. To this end, this paper presents a qualitative analysis of the perceptions of ordinary citizens, civil society groups, businesses, and others on recommender systems in Europe. The dataset examined is based on the answers submitted to a consultation about the Digital Services Act (DSA) recently enacted in the European Union (EU). Therefore, not only does the paper contribute to the pressing question about regulating new technologies and online platforms, but it also reveals insights about the policy-making of the DSA. According to the qualitative results, Europeans have generally negative opinions about recommender systems and the quality of their recommendations. The systems are widely seen to violate privacy and other fundamental rights. According to many Europeans, these also cause various societal problems, including even threats to democracy. Furthermore, existing regulations in the EU are commonly seen to have failed due to a lack of proper enforcement. Numerous suggestions were made by the respondents to the consultation for improving the situation, but only a few of these ended up to the DSA.

Read more

6/17/2024