Advancing Recommender Systems by mitigating Shilling attacks
2404.16177
0
0
āļø
Abstract
Considering the premise that the number of products offered grow in an exponential fashion and the amount of data that a user can assimilate before making a decision is relatively small, recommender systems help in categorizing content according to user preferences. Collaborative filtering is a widely used method for computing recommendations due to its good performance. But, this method makes the system vulnerable to attacks which try to bias the recommendations. These attacks, known as 'shilling attacks' are performed to push an item or nuke an item in the system. This paper proposes an algorithm to detect such shilling profiles in the system accurately and also study the effects of such profiles on the recommendations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- As the number of products offered grows exponentially, recommender systems help categorize content based on user preferences
- Collaborative filtering is a widely used method for computing recommendations, but it can be vulnerable to 'shilling attacks' that try to bias the recommendations
- This paper proposes an algorithm to detect such shilling profiles and study their effects on recommendations
Plain English Explanation
Nowadays, there are so many different products and services available that it can be overwhelming for people to choose what they want. Recommender systems are designed to help with this by suggesting items that a user might like based on their preferences and what similar users have enjoyed. One popular method for building recommender systems is called 'collaborative filtering', which looks at patterns in what people have liked in the past to predict what they might like in the future.
However, the collaborative filtering approach has a weakness - it can be manipulated by people who try to artificially boost or bury certain products. These are known as 'shilling attacks', and they can skew the recommendations in a way that doesn't actually reflect real user preferences. This paper looks at ways to detect these shilling attacks and understand how they impact the recommendations that users see.
Technical Explanation
This paper proposes a new algorithm for detecting shilling attacks in recommender systems that use collaborative filtering. The key idea is to identify user profiles that exhibit suspicious patterns, such as giving uniformly high or low ratings to certain items, which could indicate an attempt to game the system.
The researchers tested their detection algorithm on a popular movie rating dataset and found that it was able to accurately identify shilling profiles. They also studied the impact of these shilling attacks on the recommender system's output, showing that even a small number of malicious profiles could significantly skew the recommendations.
The paper provides a detailed technical description of the detection algorithm, including the mathematical formulations and experimental setup. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in mitigating the risks of shilling attacks, which is an important consideration for building robust and trustworthy recommender systems in the face of potential manipulation.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by addressing the critical issue of shilling attacks in collaborative filtering-based recommender systems. The proposed detection algorithm appears to be a promising approach, and the experimental results provide empirical evidence of its effectiveness.
However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or caveats of the approach. For instance, it's unclear how the algorithm would perform in the face of more sophisticated shilling tactics, or how it might scale to larger, more complex recommender systems. Additionally, the paper does not consider the broader implications of shilling attacks, such as their impact on user trust or the challenges of maintaining the integrity of recommender systems in an era of algorithmic collective action.
Further research could explore these aspects and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the problem and potential solutions. Nonetheless, this paper represents an important step forward in addressing a critical vulnerability in a widely used class of recommender systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel algorithm for detecting shilling attacks in collaborative filtering-based recommender systems. The proposed approach demonstrates effective identification of malicious user profiles and the ability to mitigate the impact of such attacks on the system's recommendations.
While the paper provides a solid technical foundation, there are opportunities for further exploration of the broader implications and limitations of the approach. Nonetheless, this research contributes valuable insights into safeguarding the integrity of recommender systems, which play a vital role in helping users navigate the growing abundance of digital content and products.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Harm Mitigation in Recommender Systems under User Preference Dynamics
Jerry Chee, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Udi Weinsberg, Sarah Dean, Stratis Ioannidis
0
0
We consider a recommender system that takes into account the interplay between recommendations, the evolution of user interests, and harmful content. We model the impact of recommendations on user behavior, particularly the tendency to consume harmful content. We seek recommendation policies that establish a tradeoff between maximizing click-through rate (CTR) and mitigating harm. We establish conditions under which the user profile dynamics have a stationary point, and propose algorithms for finding an optimal recommendation policy at stationarity. We experiment on a semi-synthetic movie recommendation setting initialized with real data and observe that our policies outperform baselines at simultaneously maximizing CTR and mitigating harm.
6/17/2024
Stealthy Attack on Large Language Model based Recommendation
Jinghao Zhang, Yuting Liu, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Guibing Guo, Liang Wang
0
0
Recently, the powerful large language models (LLMs) have been instrumental in propelling the progress of recommender systems (RS). However, while these systems have flourished, their susceptibility to security threats has been largely overlooked. In this work, we reveal that the introduction of LLMs into recommendation models presents new security vulnerabilities due to their emphasis on the textual content of items. We demonstrate that attackers can significantly boost an item's exposure by merely altering its textual content during the testing phase, without requiring direct interference with the model's training process. Additionally, the attack is notably stealthy, as it does not affect the overall recommendation performance and the modifications to the text are subtle, making it difficult for users and platforms to detect. Our comprehensive experiments across four mainstream LLM-based recommendation models demonstrate the superior efficacy and stealthiness of our approach. Our work unveils a significant security gap in LLM-based recommendation systems and paves the way for future research on protecting these systems.
6/6/2024
Poisoning Attacks and Defenses in Recommender Systems: A Survey
Zongwei Wang, Junliang Yu, Min Gao, Wei Yuan, Guanhua Ye, Shazia Sadiq, Hongzhi Yin
0
0
Modern recommender systems (RS) have profoundly enhanced user experience across digital platforms, yet they face significant threats from poisoning attacks. These attacks, aimed at manipulating recommendation outputs for unethical gains, exploit vulnerabilities in RS through injecting malicious data or intervening model training. This survey presents a unique perspective by examining these threats through the lens of an attacker, offering fresh insights into their mechanics and impacts. Concretely, we detail a systematic pipeline that encompasses four stages of a poisoning attack: setting attack goals, assessing attacker capabilities, analyzing victim architecture, and implementing poisoning strategies. The pipeline not only aligns with various attack tactics but also serves as a comprehensive taxonomy to pinpoint focuses of distinct poisoning attacks. Correspondingly, we further classify defensive strategies into two main categories: poisoning data filtering and robust training from the defender's perspective. Finally, we highlight existing limitations and suggest innovative directions for further exploration in this field.
6/6/2024
š
Review-based Recommender Systems: A Survey of Approaches, Challenges and Future Perspectives
Emrul Hasan, Mizanur Rahman, Chen Ding, Jimmy Xiangji Huang, Shaina Raza
0
0
Recommender systems play a pivotal role in helping users navigate an overwhelming selection of products and services. On online platforms, users have the opportunity to share feedback in various modes, including numerical ratings, textual reviews, and likes/dislikes. Traditional recommendation systems rely on users explicit ratings or implicit interactions (e.g. likes, clicks, shares, saves) to learn user preferences and item characteristics. Beyond these numerical ratings, textual reviews provide insights into users fine-grained preferences and item features. Analyzing these reviews is crucial for enhancing the performance and interpretability of personalized recommendation results. In recent years, review-based recommender systems have emerged as a significant sub-field in this domain. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of the developments in review-based recommender systems over recent years, highlighting the importance of reviews in recommender systems, as well as the challenges associated with extracting features from reviews and integrating them into ratings. Specifically, we present a categorization of these systems and summarize the state-of-the-art methods, analyzing their unique features, effectiveness, and limitations. Finally, we propose potential directions for future research, including the integration of multimodal data, multi-criteria rating information, and ethical considerations.
5/14/2024