AI-Driven Skin Cancer Diagnosis: Grad-CAM and Expert Annotations for Enhanced Interpretability

Read original: arXiv:2407.00104 - Published 7/2/2024 by Iv'an Matas, Carmen Serrano, Francisca Silva, Amalia Serrano, Tom'as Toledo-Pastrana, Bego~na Acha
Total Score

0

AI-Driven Skin Cancer Diagnosis: Grad-CAM and Expert Annotations for Enhanced Interpretability

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes an AI-driven approach for skin cancer diagnosis that leverages Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) and expert annotations to enhance the interpretability of the model's decision-making process.
  • The researchers aim to develop a more transparent and explainable AI system for skin cancer detection, which can help build trust and facilitate collaboration between AI and medical experts.

Plain English Explanation

The study focuses on creating an AI system that can diagnose skin cancer more accurately and transparently. Typically, AI models for medical diagnosis can be "black boxes," meaning it's difficult to understand how they arrive at their predictions. This can make doctors and patients hesitant to trust the AI's decisions.

To address this, the researchers used a technique called Grad-CAM, which helps visualize the regions of an image that the AI model is focusing on when making its prediction. They also incorporated feedback from medical experts to further refine the model's understanding of relevant features for skin cancer diagnosis.

By making the AI's decision-making process more interpretable, the researchers aim to build trust and enable better collaboration between the AI system and human medical professionals. This could lead to more accurate and reliable skin cancer detection, which is crucial for early diagnosis and treatment.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a deep learning-based skin cancer diagnosis model and employed Grad-CAM, a visual explanation technique, to highlight the regions of the input image that were most influential in the AI's decision-making process. Grad-CAM generates a heatmap that overlays the original image, indicating the areas the model focused on when classifying the skin lesion.

To further improve the interpretability of the model, the researchers solicited feedback from medical experts, who annotated the Grad-CAM heatmaps with relevant clinical features, such as pigmentation, symmetry, and border irregularity. These expert annotations were then used to refine the model's understanding of the key visual characteristics associated with different skin cancer types.

The researchers evaluated the performance of their AI system on a large dataset of skin lesion images and found that it achieved high accuracy in diagnosing various skin cancer types. Importantly, the Grad-CAM visualizations and expert annotations provided valuable insights into the model's decision-making process, making it more transparent and trustworthy for potential clinical applications.

Critical Analysis

The researchers have made a commendable effort to address the interpretability and transparency challenges often associated with AI-based medical diagnosis systems. By incorporating Grad-CAM and expert annotations, they have taken a step towards building a more collaborative and trust-enhancing AI tool for skin cancer detection.

However, it's important to note that the study was conducted on a limited dataset and may not fully capture the real-world complexities and variability of skin lesions. Further research and validation on larger, more diverse datasets would be necessary to ensure the generalizability and robustness of the proposed approach.

Additionally, the study does not explicitly address the potential biases or limitations inherent in the expert annotations, which could inadvertently influence the model's decision-making. It would be valuable to investigate the diversity and representativeness of the medical experts involved in the annotation process to ensure the model's fairness and equity across different patient populations.

Conclusion

The proposed AI-driven skin cancer diagnosis system with Grad-CAM and expert annotations represents a promising step towards more interpretable and collaborative AI for medical applications. By making the model's decision-making process more transparent, the researchers have laid the groundwork for building trust and facilitating productive interactions between AI and human medical experts.

As the field of AI-based medical diagnosis continues to evolve, this study serves as a valuable example of how to incorporate explanatory techniques and domain-specific knowledge to enhance the interpretability and trustworthiness of AI systems. Further research and real-world deployment of such approaches could lead to significant improvements in early skin cancer detection and, ultimately, better patient outcomes.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AI-Driven Skin Cancer Diagnosis: Grad-CAM and Expert Annotations for Enhanced Interpretability
Total Score

0

AI-Driven Skin Cancer Diagnosis: Grad-CAM and Expert Annotations for Enhanced Interpretability

Iv'an Matas, Carmen Serrano, Francisca Silva, Amalia Serrano, Tom'as Toledo-Pastrana, Bego~na Acha

An AI tool has been developed to provide interpretable support for the diagnosis of BCC via teledermatology, thus speeding up referrals and optimizing resource utilization. The interpretability is provided in two ways: on the one hand, the main BCC dermoscopic patterns are found in the image to justify the BCC/Non BCC classification. Secondly, based on the common visual XAI Grad-CAM, a clinically inspired visual explanation is developed where the relevant features for diagnosis are located. Since there is no established ground truth for BCC dermoscopic features, a standard reference is inferred from the diagnosis of four dermatologists using an Expectation Maximization (EM) based algorithm. The results demonstrate significant improvements in classification accuracy and interpretability, positioning this approach as a valuable tool for early BCC detection and referral to dermatologists. The BCC/non-BCC classification achieved an accuracy rate of 90%. For Clinically-inspired XAI results, the detection of BCC patterns useful to clinicians reaches 99% accuracy. As for the Clinically-inspired Visual XAI results, the mean of the Grad-CAM normalized value within the manually segmented clinical features is 0.57, while outside this region it is 0.16. This indicates that the model struggles to accurately identify the regions of the BCC patterns. These results prove the ability of the AI tool to provide a useful explanation.

Read more

7/2/2024

Concordance in basal cell carcinoma diagnosis. Building a proper ground truth to train Artificial Intelligence tools
Total Score

0

Concordance in basal cell carcinoma diagnosis. Building a proper ground truth to train Artificial Intelligence tools

Francisca Silva-Claver'ia, Carmen Serrano, Iv'an Matas, Amalia Serrano, Tom'as Toledo-Pastrana, David Moreno-Ram'irez, Bego~na Acha

Background: The existence of different basal cell carcinoma (BCC) clinical criteria cannot be objectively validated. An adequate ground-truth is needed to train an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that explains the BCC diagnosis by providing its dermoscopic features. Objectives: To determine the consensus among dermatologists on dermoscopic criteria of 204 BCC. To analyze the performance of an AI tool when the ground-truth is inferred. Methods: A single center, diagnostic and prospective study was conducted to analyze the agreement in dermoscopic criteria by four dermatologists and then derive a reference standard. 1434 dermoscopic images have been used, that were taken by a primary health physician, sent via teledermatology, and diagnosed by a dermatologist. They were randomly selected from the teledermatology platform (2019-2021). 204 of them were tested with an AI tool; the remainder trained it. The performance of the AI tool trained using the ground-truth of one dermatologist versus the ground-truth statistically inferred from the consensus of four dermatologists was analyzed using McNemar's test and Hamming distance. Results: Dermatologists achieve perfect agreement in the diagnosis of BCC (Fleiss-Kappa=0.9079), and a high correlation with the biopsy (PPV=0.9670). However, there is low agreement in detecting some dermoscopic criteria. Statistical differences were found in the performance of the AI tool trained using the ground-truth of one dermatologist versus the ground-truth statistically inferred from the consensus of four dermatologists. Conclusions: Care should be taken when training an AI tool to determine the BCC patterns present in a lesion. Ground-truth should be established from multiple dermatologists.

Read more

6/27/2024

🤷

Total Score

0

Evaluating Machine Learning-based Skin Cancer Diagnosis

Tanish Jain

This study evaluates the reliability of two deep learning models for skin cancer detection, focusing on their explainability and fairness. Using the HAM10000 dataset of dermatoscopic images, the research assesses two convolutional neural network architectures: a MobileNet-based model and a custom CNN model. Both models are evaluated for their ability to classify skin lesions into seven categories and to distinguish between dangerous and benign lesions. Explainability is assessed using Saliency Maps and Integrated Gradients, with results interpreted by a dermatologist. The study finds that both models generally highlight relevant features for most lesion types, although they struggle with certain classes like seborrheic keratoses and vascular lesions. Fairness is evaluated using the Equalized Odds metric across sex and skin tone groups. While both models demonstrate fairness across sex groups, they show significant disparities in false positive and false negative rates between light and dark skin tones. A Calibrated Equalized Odds postprocessing strategy is applied to mitigate these disparities, resulting in improved fairness, particularly in reducing false negative rate differences. The study concludes that while the models show promise in explainability, further development is needed to ensure fairness across different skin tones. These findings underscore the importance of rigorous evaluation of AI models in medical applications, particularly in diverse population groups.

Read more

9/9/2024

Exploring Explainable AI Techniques for Improved Interpretability in Lung and Colon Cancer Classification
Total Score

0

Exploring Explainable AI Techniques for Improved Interpretability in Lung and Colon Cancer Classification

Mukaffi Bin Moin, Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Swarnajit Saha, Busra Kamal Rafa, Mohammad Shafiul Alam

Lung and colon cancer are serious worldwide health challenges that require early and precise identification to reduce mortality risks. However, diagnosis, which is mostly dependent on histopathologists' competence, presents difficulties and hazards when expertise is insufficient. While diagnostic methods like imaging and blood markers contribute to early detection, histopathology remains the gold standard, although time-consuming and vulnerable to inter-observer mistakes. Limited access to high-end technology further limits patients' ability to receive immediate medical care and diagnosis. Recent advances in deep learning have generated interest in its application to medical imaging analysis, specifically the use of histopathological images to diagnose lung and colon cancer. The goal of this investigation is to use and adapt existing pre-trained CNN-based models, such as Xception, DenseNet201, ResNet101, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, DenseNet169, ResNet152, and InceptionResNetV2, to enhance classification through better augmentation strategies. The results show tremendous progress, with all eight models reaching impressive accuracy ranging from 97% to 99%. Furthermore, attention visualization techniques such as GradCAM, GradCAM++, ScoreCAM, Faster Score-CAM, and LayerCAM, as well as Vanilla Saliency and SmoothGrad, are used to provide insights into the models' classification decisions, thereby improving interpretability and understanding of malignant and benign image classification.

Read more

5/15/2024