AI Literacy for All: Adjustable Interdisciplinary Socio-technical Curriculum

Read original: arXiv:2409.10552 - Published 9/18/2024 by Sri Yash Tadimalla, Mary Lou Maher

🤖

Overview

This paper proposes an adjustable, interdisciplinary socio-technical curriculum for AI literacy education.
The curriculum is designed to democratize AI by making it accessible to learners of all backgrounds.
It covers technical, social, and ethical aspects of AI to promote responsible development and use of these technologies.
The curriculum can be tailored to different educational settings and learner needs.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new approach to teaching people about artificial intelligence (AI) that is flexible and covers a wide range of topics. The goal is to make AI education accessible to everyone, not just those with technical backgrounds.

The curriculum is designed to teach both the technical details of how AI systems work, as well as the social and ethical implications of using these technologies. This is important because AI is becoming more widespread, and we need to make sure it is developed and used responsibly.

The curriculum can be adapted to different educational settings, such as schools, universities, or workplaces. It can also be tailored to the needs and interests of different learners, whether they are students, professionals, or members of the general public.

By democratizing AI education in this way, the researchers hope to empower more people to understand, engage with, and shape the development of these important technologies.

Technical Explanation

The paper outlines a modular, interdisciplinary curriculum for AI literacy education. The curriculum covers three main areas:

Technical: This module teaches the fundamental concepts and techniques of AI, such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing.
Social: This module explores the societal implications of AI, including issues of bias, fairness, privacy, and the impact on jobs and the workforce.
Ethical: This module addresses the ethical considerations around the development and deployment of AI, such as transparency, accountability, and the alignment of AI systems with human values.

The researchers used a participatory design approach to develop the curriculum, involving input from stakeholders like educators, AI experts, and members of the public. This ensures the curriculum is tailored to the needs and concerns of diverse learners.

The modular structure of the curriculum allows instructors to customize the content and emphasis based on the specific educational context and learner goals. This flexibility is key to making the curriculum broadly applicable and accessible.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-conceived and comprehensive approach to AI literacy education. The interdisciplinary nature of the curriculum is a particular strength, as it recognizes the socio-technical nature of AI and the need to address both technical and non-technical aspects.

One potential limitation is the challenge of implementing such a broad curriculum in practice, especially in more constrained educational settings. The researchers acknowledge this and emphasize the need for flexibility and customization to address different contexts and learner needs.

Additionally, the paper does not provide detailed empirical evidence on the effectiveness of the curriculum. While the participatory design approach is a positive step, further research and evaluation would be helpful to validate the curriculum's impact and refine it over time.

Overall, this paper offers a valuable model for democratizing AI education and promoting responsible development and use of these technologies. The adaptable, interdisciplinary approach could serve as a blueprint for other institutions and educators looking to enhance AI literacy among diverse learners.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative, adjustable curriculum for AI literacy education that aims to make these important technologies more accessible and understandable to learners from all backgrounds. By covering technical, social, and ethical dimensions of AI, the curriculum promotes a holistic understanding of the capabilities and implications of these systems.

The modular, interdisciplinary design of the curriculum allows it to be tailored to different educational settings and learner needs, which is crucial for democratizing AI education. While further research is needed to fully validate the curriculum's effectiveness, this paper offers a promising model for empowering more people to engage with and shape the development of artificial intelligence.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

New!AI Literacy for All: Adjustable Interdisciplinary Socio-technical Curriculum

Sri Yash Tadimalla, Mary Lou Maher

This paper presents a curriculum, AI Literacy for All, to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of AI, its socio-technical implications, and its practical applications for all levels of education. With the rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), there is a need for AI literacy that goes beyond the traditional AI education curriculum. AI literacy has been conceptualized in various ways, including public literacy, competency building for designers, conceptual understanding of AI concepts, and domain-specific upskilling. Most of these conceptualizations were established before the public release of Generative AI (Gen-AI) tools like ChatGPT. AI education has focused on the principles and applications of AI through a technical lens that emphasizes the mastery of AI principles, the mathematical foundations underlying these technologies, and the programming and mathematical skills necessary to implement AI solutions. In AI Literacy for All, we emphasize a balanced curriculum that includes technical and non-technical learning outcomes to enable a conceptual understanding and critical evaluation of AI technologies in an interdisciplinary socio-technical context. The paper presents four pillars of AI literacy: understanding the scope and technical dimensions of AI, learning how to interact with Gen-AI in an informed and responsible way, the socio-technical issues of ethical and responsible AI, and the social and future implications of AI. While it is important to include all learning outcomes for AI education in a Computer Science major, the learning outcomes can be adjusted for other learning contexts, including, non-CS majors, high school summer camps, the adult workforce, and the public. This paper advocates for a shift in AI literacy education to offer a more interdisciplinary socio-technical approach as a pathway to broaden participation in AI.

9/18/2024

🤖

Rethinking the A in STEAM: Insights from and for AI Literacy Education

Pekka Mertala, JAnne Fagerlund, Tomi Slotte Dufva

This article rethinks the role of arts in STEAM education, emphasizing its importance in AI literacy within K-12 contexts. Arguing against the marginalization of arts, the paper is structured around four key domains: language studies, philosophy, social studies, and visual arts. Each section addresses critical AI-related phenomena and provides pedagogical strate-gies for effective integration into STEAM education. Language studies focus on media representations and the probabilistic nature of AI language models. The philosophy section examines anthropomorphism, ethics, and the misconstrued human-like capabilities of AI. Social studies discuss AI's societal impacts, biases, and ethical considerations in data prac-tices. Visual arts explore the implications of generative AI on artistic processes and intellec-tual property. The article concludes by advocating for a robust inclusion of arts in STEAM to foster a holistic, equitable, and sustainable understanding of AI, ultimately inspiring technologies that promote fairness and creativity.

5/29/2024

🔎

Collaborative Design of AI-Enhanced Learning Activities

Margarida Romero (LINE, COMUE UCA, ULaval, Mnemosyne, UniCA)

Artificial intelligence has accelerated innovations in different aspects of citizens' lives. Many contexts have already addressed technology-enhanced learning, but educators at different educational levels now need to develop AI literacy and the ability to integrate appropriate AI usage into their teaching. We take into account this objective, along with the creative learning design, to create a formative intervention that enables preservice teachers, in-service teachers, and EdTech specialists to effectively incorporate AI into their teaching practices. We developed the formative intervention with Terra Numerica and Maison de l'Intelligence Artificielle in two phases in order to enhance their understanding of AI and foster its creative application in learning design. Participants reflect on AI's potential in teaching and learning by exploring different activities that can integrate AI literacy in education, including its ethical considerations and potential for innovative pedagogy. The approach emphasises not only acculturating professionals to AI but also empowering them to collaboratively design AI-enhanced educational activities that promote learner engagement and personalised learning experiences. Through this process, participants in the workshops develop the skills and mindset necessary to effectively leverage AI while maintaining a critical awareness of its implications in education.

7/10/2024

🏷️

The Interplay of Learning, Analytics, and Artificial Intelligence in Education

Mutlu Cukurova

This paper presents a multi-dimensional view of AI's role in learning and education, emphasizing the intricate interplay between AI, analytics, and the learning processes. Here, I challenge the prevalent narrow conceptualisation of AI as tools, as exemplified in generative AI tools, and argue for the importance of alternative conceptualisations of AI for achieving human-AI hybrid intelligence. I highlight the differences between human intelligence and artificial information processing, the importance of hybrid human-AI systems to extend human cognition, and posit that AI can also serve as an instrument for understanding human learning. Early learning sciences and AI in Education research (AIED), which saw AI as an analogy for human intelligence, have diverged from this perspective, prompting a need to rekindle this connection. The paper presents three unique conceptualisations of AI: the externalization of human cognition, the internalization of AI models to influence human mental models, and the extension of human cognition via tightly coupled human-AI hybrid intelligence systems. Examples from current research and practice are examined as instances of the three conceptualisations in education, highlighting the potential value and limitations of each conceptualisation for education, as well as the perils of overemphasis on externalising human cognition. The paper concludes with advocacy for a broader approach to AIED that goes beyond considerations on the design and development of AI, but also includes educating people about AI and innovating educational systems to remain relevant in an AI-ubiquitous world.

7/9/2024