American Sign Language to Text Translation using Transformer and Seq2Seq with LSTM

Overview

• Sign language translation is an important issue in communication between deaf and hearing people.
• American Sign Language (ASL) is one of the sign languages used, including the alphabetic sign.
• Neural machine translation technology is advancing towards sign language translation.
• The study compares the Transformer model with the Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) model in translating sign language to text.
• An experiment was conducted by adding Residual Long Short-Term Memory (ResidualLSTM) to the Transformer.

Plain English Explanation

Sign language is a way for deaf and hard-of-hearing people to communicate using hand, body, and mouth movements. American Sign Language is one type of sign language that uses an alphabetic sign system. As natural language processing technology advances, researchers are working on developing machine translation systems that can translate sign language to written text.

This study looked at two different machine translation models - the Transformer and the Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) model - to see how well they could translate sign language to text. The researchers also tried adding a component called Residual Long Short-Term Memory (ResidualLSTM) to the Transformer model to see if that would improve its performance.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used the Transformer model, which has become the state-of-the-art in natural language processing, and compared it to the Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) model for translating sign language to text. The Transformer model is known for its ability to capture long-range dependencies in language, which could be valuable for translating the complex movements and patterns of sign language.

The experiment involved adding a Residual Long Short-Term Memory (ResidualLSTM) component to the Transformer model. ResidualLSTM is a type of recurrent neural network that can help the model better remember and process sequential information, which could be useful for sign language translation.

The researchers evaluated the performance of the Transformer, Seq2Seq, and Transformer with ResidualLSTM models using the BLEU score, which measures the similarity between the model's translations and human-generated reference translations. The results showed that the Transformer model outperformed the Seq2Seq model, increasing the BLEU score by 28.14. However, adding the ResidualLSTM component to the Transformer actually reduced its performance by 23.37% based on the BLEU score.

Critical Analysis

The study provides a useful comparison of different machine translation models for sign language, which is an important and challenging problem in assistive technology. The researchers chose appropriate metrics, like the BLEU score, to evaluate the models' performance.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential reasons why adding the ResidualLSTM component reduced the Transformer's performance. It would be helpful to understand the specific limitations or challenges of incorporating this type of recurrent neural network into the Transformer architecture for sign language translation.

Additionally, the study is focused on a single language pair (ASL to English text), and it's unclear how the models would perform on other sign language to text translation tasks. Further research could explore the generalizability of these findings to other sign languages and language pairs.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of the Transformer model for sign language translation, outperforming the Seq2Seq model. However, the addition of the ResidualLSTM component did not improve the Transformer's performance as expected. The results highlight the ongoing challenges in developing effective machine translation systems for sign language and the need for further research in this important area of assistive technology.