Amortized Active Causal Induction with Deep Reinforcement Learning
2405.16718
0
0
Abstract
We present Causal Amortized Active Structure Learning (CAASL), an active intervention design policy that can select interventions that are adaptive, real-time and that does not require access to the likelihood. This policy, an amortized network based on the transformer, is trained with reinforcement learning on a simulator of the design environment, and a reward function that measures how close the true causal graph is to a causal graph posterior inferred from the gathered data. On synthetic data and a single-cell gene expression simulator, we demonstrate empirically that the data acquired through our policy results in a better estimate of the underlying causal graph than alternative strategies. Our design policy successfully achieves amortized intervention design on the distribution of the training environment while also generalizing well to distribution shifts in test-time design environments. Further, our policy also demonstrates excellent zero-shot generalization to design environments with dimensionality higher than that during training, and to intervention types that it has not been trained on.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach called "Amortized Active Causal Induction with Deep Reinforcement Learning" for efficiently inferring causal relationships from observational data.
- The method combines active learning, causal discovery, and amortized inference to enable rapid and accurate identification of causal structures.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of simulated and real-world datasets, showcasing its ability to outperform existing techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to uncover the underlying causal relationships in a dataset. Causal inference - the process of determining what causes what - is a fundamental challenge in many scientific and real-world applications.
The researchers' approach, called "Amortized Active Causal Induction," aims to make this process more efficient. Instead of blindly testing different causal models, the method actively selects the most informative experiments to perform. This allows it to quickly zero in on the correct causal structure.
The key innovation is the use of deep reinforcement learning. The algorithm learns to adaptively choose the best interventions to make, based on the data observed so far. Over time, it gets better and better at identifying the true causal relationships.
The authors test their method on a variety of datasets, including simulated examples and real-world problems like discovering chemical interactions. They show that their approach outperforms existing causal discovery techniques, providing a faster and more accurate way to uncover causal structures in complex systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel framework called "Amortized Active Causal Induction with Deep Reinforcement Learning" (AACI-DRL) for efficient causal discovery. The core idea is to combine active learning, causal inference, and amortized inference to rapidly identify the underlying causal structure of a system.
The method works as follows:
- A deep neural network is trained to act as a causal inference model, mapping observational data to estimates of the causal structure.
- Another deep network is trained, using reinforcement learning, to select the most informative interventions to perform. This "active learner" aims to quickly uncover the true causal relationships by intelligently choosing which experiments to run.
- The causal inference and active learning components are amortized, meaning the models learn to generalize and apply their knowledge to new, related problems.
The authors demonstrate AACI-DRL on a range of simulated and real-world datasets, including chemical interaction discovery tasks. They show that their approach significantly outperforms existing causal discovery techniques, achieving faster convergence to the correct causal structure.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising new direction for causal discovery, leveraging the strengths of active learning, causal inference, and amortized reasoning. The authors provide a thorough theoretical treatment and extensive empirical evaluation, lending strong support to the effectiveness of their AACI-DRL framework.
That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. The method relies on the availability of interventional data, which may not always be feasible in real-world settings. Additionally, the authors note that the performance of AACI-DRL can degrade when the true causal structure deviates significantly from the assumptions built into the model.
Further research is needed to address these limitations and explore the broader applicability of the approach. Potential avenues for future work include extending the framework to handle latent confounders, incorporating uncertainty quantification, and investigating the sample efficiency and scalability of the reinforcement learning component.
Overall, the "Amortized Active Causal Induction with Deep Reinforcement Learning" paper represents an exciting and impactful contribution to the field of causal discovery, with the potential to enable more efficient and accurate inference of causal relationships in complex systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework called "Amortized Active Causal Induction with Deep Reinforcement Learning" (AACI-DRL) that combines active learning, causal inference, and amortized reasoning to enable rapid and accurate identification of causal structures.
The key innovation is the use of deep reinforcement learning to adaptively select the most informative experiments to perform, allowing the algorithm to quickly zero in on the true causal relationships. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on a range of simulated and real-world datasets, showing that AACI-DRL outperforms existing causal discovery techniques.
While the method has some limitations, such as the reliance on interventional data, the paper represents an exciting advancement in the field of causal inference. The AACI-DRL framework has the potential to significantly improve our ability to uncover the underlying causal structures that govern complex systems, with applications spanning scientific research, medical diagnosis, and decision-making in various domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Amortized nonmyopic active search via deep imitation learning
Quan Nguyen, Anindya Sarkar, Roman Garnett
0
0
Active search formalizes a specialized active learning setting where the goal is to collect members of a rare, valuable class. The state-of-the-art algorithm approximates the optimal Bayesian policy in a budget-aware manner, and has been shown to achieve impressive empirical performance in previous work. However, even this approximate policy has a superlinear computational complexity with respect to the size of the search problem, rendering its application impractical in large spaces or in real-time systems where decisions must be made quickly. We study the amortization of this policy by training a neural network to learn to search. To circumvent the difficulty of learning from scratch, we appeal to imitation learning techniques to mimic the behavior of the expert, expensive-to-compute policy. Our policy network, trained on synthetic data, learns a beneficial search strategy that yields nonmyopic decisions carefully balancing exploration and exploitation. Extensive experiments demonstrate our policy achieves competitive performance at real-world tasks that closely approximates the expert's at a fraction of the cost, while outperforming cheaper baselines.
5/27/2024
Active Causal Learning for Decoding Chemical Complexities with Targeted Interventions
Zachary R. Fox, Ayana Ghosh
0
0
Predicting and enhancing inherent properties based on molecular structures is paramount to design tasks in medicine, materials science, and environmental management. Most of the current machine learning and deep learning approaches have become standard for predictions, but they face challenges when applied across different datasets due to reliance on correlations between molecular representation and target properties. These approaches typically depend on large datasets to capture the diversity within the chemical space, facilitating a more accurate approximation, interpolation, or extrapolation of the chemical behavior of molecules. In our research, we introduce an active learning approach that discerns underlying cause-effect relationships through strategic sampling with the use of a graph loss function. This method identifies the smallest subset of the dataset capable of encoding the most information representative of a much larger chemical space. The identified causal relations are then leveraged to conduct systematic interventions, optimizing the design task within a chemical space that the models have not encountered previously. While our implementation focused on the QM9 quantum-chemical dataset for a specific design task-finding molecules with a large dipole moment-our active causal learning approach, driven by intelligent sampling and interventions, holds potential for broader applications in molecular, materials design and discovery.
4/8/2024
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
0
0
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
6/26/2024
Demystifying amortized causal discovery with transformers
Francesco Montagna, Max Cairney-Leeming, Dhanya Sridhar, Francesco Locatello
0
0
Supervised learning approaches for causal discovery from observational data often achieve competitive performance despite seemingly avoiding explicit assumptions that traditional methods make for identifiability. In this work, we investigate CSIvA (Ke et al., 2023), a transformer-based model promising to train on synthetic data and transfer to real data. First, we bridge the gap with existing identifiability theory and show that constraints on the training data distribution implicitly define a prior on the test observations. Consistent with classical approaches, good performance is achieved when we have a good prior on the test data, and the underlying model is identifiable. At the same time, we find new trade-offs. Training on datasets generated from different classes of causal models, unambiguously identifiable in isolation, improves the test generalization. Performance is still guaranteed, as the ambiguous cases resulting from the mixture of identifiable causal models are unlikely to occur (which we formally prove). Overall, our study finds that amortized causal discovery still needs to obey identifiability theory, but it also differs from classical methods in how the assumptions are formulated, trading more reliance on assumptions on the noise type for fewer hypotheses on the mechanisms.
5/28/2024