Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents an adaptive online experimental design approach for causal discovery
- Focuses on efficiently identifying the causal structure of a system through a sequence of interventions
- Aims to minimize the number of experiments required to accurately reconstruct the underlying causal model
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a method for [object Object], which is the process of determining the causal relationships between variables in a system. The key idea is to use an "adaptive" approach, where the experiments performed are chosen based on the information gained from previous experiments.
This allows the method to efficiently identify the causal structure by conducting a sequence of targeted interventions, rather than randomly trying different experiments. The goal is to minimize the number of experiments required to accurately reconstruct the underlying [object Object].
For example, imagine you're trying to understand how different factors affect the growth of a plant. Instead of randomly testing different variables, the adaptive approach would strategically choose which factors to manipulate in order to quickly learn the most about the causal relationships involved.
Technical Explanation
The paper formulates the causal discovery problem as a [object Object] task, where the goal is to efficiently identify the underlying [object Object] through a sequence of interventions.
The authors propose an adaptive online experimental design algorithm that iteratively selects the next intervention to perform based on the information gained from previous experiments. This is achieved by maintaining a posterior distribution over the space of possible causal models and using an acquisition function to identify the most informative intervention.
The key technical contributions include:
- A principled Bayesian framework for modeling the posterior over causal models
- An efficient algorithm for selecting the next intervention to perform
- Theoretical guarantees on the convergence rate of the method
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach through both synthetic and real-world experiments, showing that it can accurately recover causal structures while requiring significantly fewer interventions compared to traditional methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and theoretically sound approach to the important problem of causal discovery. The adaptive nature of the algorithm and the Bayesian framework for modeling the posterior over causal models are clear strengths.
However, the paper does not address the potential challenges of applying this method in real-world scenarios, where the underlying causal structure may be more complex, the system may be subject to confounding variables, or the interventions may have unintended consequences. Additionally, the theoretical guarantees are provided under somewhat restrictive assumptions, and it would be valuable to understand the method's robustness to violations of these assumptions.
Further research could explore ways to extend the approach to handle more realistic and challenging causal discovery scenarios, as well as investigate the practical considerations and limitations of deploying such a system in the real world.
Conclusion
This paper presents an adaptive online experimental design approach for efficient causal discovery. By intelligently selecting the next intervention to perform based on the information gained from previous experiments, the method can accurately reconstruct the underlying causal model while minimizing the required number of interventions.
The technical contributions and the demonstrated empirical performance make this an important advance in the field of causal discovery, with potential applications in areas such as scientific experimentation, policy decision-making, and systems engineering. However, further research is needed to address the practical challenges and limitations of the approach to enable its widespread adoption.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Adaptive Online Experimental Design for Causal Discovery
Muhammad Qasim Elahi, Lai Wei, Murat Kocaoglu, Mahsa Ghasemi
Causal discovery aims to uncover cause-and-effect relationships encoded in causal graphs by leveraging observational, interventional data, or their combination. The majority of existing causal discovery methods are developed assuming infinite interventional data. We focus on data interventional efficiency and formalize causal discovery from the perspective of online learning, inspired by pure exploration in bandit problems. A graph separating system, consisting of interventions that cut every edge of the graph at least once, is sufficient for learning causal graphs when infinite interventional data is available, even in the worst case. We propose a track-and-stop causal discovery algorithm that adaptively selects interventions from the graph separating system via allocation matching and learns the causal graph based on sampling history. Given any desired confidence value, the algorithm determines a termination condition and runs until it is met. We analyze the algorithm to establish a problem-dependent upper bound on the expected number of required interventional samples. Our proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods in simulations across various randomly generated causal graphs. It achieves higher accuracy, measured by the structural hamming distance (SHD) between the learned causal graph and the ground truth, with significantly fewer samples.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Bayesian Intervention Optimization for Causal Discovery
Yuxuan Wang, Mingzhou Liu, Xinwei Sun, Wei Wang, Yizhou Wang
Causal discovery is crucial for understanding complex systems and informing decisions. While observational data can uncover causal relationships under certain assumptions, it often falls short, making active interventions necessary. Current methods, such as Bayesian and graph-theoretical approaches, do not prioritize decision-making and often rely on ideal conditions or information gain, which is not directly related to hypothesis testing. We propose a novel Bayesian optimization-based method inspired by Bayes factors that aims to maximize the probability of obtaining decisive and correct evidence. Our approach uses observational data to estimate causal models under different hypotheses, evaluates potential interventions pre-experimentally, and iteratively updates priors to refine interventions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through various experiments. Our contributions provide a robust framework for efficient causal discovery through active interventions, enhancing the practical application of theoretical advancements.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Interventional Causal Structure Discovery over Graphical Models with Convergence and Optimality Guarantees
Qiu Chengbo, Yang Kai
Learning causal structure from sampled data is a fundamental problem with applications in various fields, including healthcare, machine learning and artificial intelligence. Traditional methods predominantly rely on observational data, but there exist limits regarding the identifiability of causal structures with only observational data. Interventional data, on the other hand, helps establish a cause-and-effect relationship by breaking the influence of confounding variables. It remains to date under-explored to develop a mathematical framework that seamlessly integrates both observational and interventional data in causal structure learning. Furthermore, existing studies often focus on centralized approaches, necessitating the transfer of entire datasets to a single server, which lead to considerable communication overhead and heightened risks to privacy. To tackle these challenges, we develop a bilevel polynomial optimization (Bloom) framework. Bloom not only provides a powerful mathematical modeling framework, underpinned by theoretical support, for causal structure discovery from both interventional and observational data, but also aspires to an efficient causal discovery algorithm with convergence and optimality guarantees. We further extend Bloom to a distributed setting to reduce the communication overhead and mitigate data privacy risks. It is seen through experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets that Bloom markedly surpasses other leading learning algorithms.
Read more8/12/2024
0
Interventional Causal Discovery in a Mixture of DAGs
Burak Var{i}c{i}, Dmitriy Katz-Rogozhnikov, Dennis Wei, Prasanna Sattigeri, Ali Tajer
Causal interactions among a group of variables are often modeled by a single causal graph. In some domains, however, these interactions are best described by multiple co-existing causal graphs, e.g., in dynamical systems or genomics. This paper addresses the hitherto unknown role of interventions in learning causal interactions among variables governed by a mixture of causal systems, each modeled by one directed acyclic graph (DAG). Causal discovery from mixtures is fundamentally more challenging than single-DAG causal discovery. Two major difficulties stem from (i) inherent uncertainty about the skeletons of the component DAGs that constitute the mixture and (ii) possibly cyclic relationships across these component DAGs. This paper addresses these challenges and aims to identify edges that exist in at least one component DAG of the mixture, referred to as true edges. First, it establishes matching necessary and sufficient conditions on the size of interventions required to identify the true edges. Next, guided by the necessity results, an adaptive algorithm is designed that learns all true edges using ${cal O}(n^2)$ interventions, where $n$ is the number of nodes. Remarkably, the size of the interventions is optimal if the underlying mixture model does not contain cycles across its components. More generally, the gap between the intervention size used by the algorithm and the optimal size is quantified. It is shown to be bounded by the cyclic complexity number of the mixture model, defined as the size of the minimal intervention that can break the cycles in the mixture, which is upper bounded by the number of cycles among the ancestors of a node.
Read more6/14/2024