Amortized Bayesian Workflow (Extended Abstract)

Read original: arXiv:2409.04332 - Published 9/9/2024 by Marvin Schmitt, Chengkun Li, Aki Vehtari, Luigi Acerbi, Paul-Christian Burkner, Stefan T. Radev
Total Score

0

Amortized Bayesian Workflow (Extended Abstract)

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes an "amortized Bayesian workflow" that integrates amortized inference techniques into the traditional Bayesian modeling process.
  • Amortized inference uses a neural network to learn a mapping from observations to posterior distributions, which can make Bayesian inference more efficient.
  • The paper discusses how amortized inference can be incorporated into different stages of the Bayesian workflow, such as model checking, parameter estimation, and posterior exploration.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new approach to Bayesian data analysis called the "amortized Bayesian workflow". Bayesian analysis is a powerful statistical method that allows researchers to incorporate prior knowledge and uncertainty into their models. However, traditional Bayesian methods can be computationally intensive, especially for complex models.

Amortized inference is a technique that uses a neural network to learn a mapping from observed data to the posterior distribution of the model parameters. This means the neural network can rapidly predict the posterior distribution for new observations, without having to re-run the full Bayesian inference process. The authors show how amortized inference can be integrated into the different stages of the Bayesian workflow, including:

  • Model checking: Using the amortized inference network to quickly assess how well the model fits the data.
  • Parameter estimation: Leveraging the amortized network to efficiently explore the posterior distribution of model parameters.
  • Posterior exploration: Applying the amortized network to rapidly generate posterior samples and visualize the uncertainty in model predictions.

By combining amortized inference with traditional Bayesian methods, the authors argue that researchers can perform Bayesian data analysis more efficiently, without sacrificing the flexibility and rigor of the Bayesian approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an "amortized Bayesian workflow" that integrates amortized inference techniques into the traditional Bayesian modeling process. Amortized inference uses a neural network to learn a mapping from observations to posterior distributions, which can make Bayesian inference more efficient.

The authors discuss how amortized inference can be incorporated into different stages of the Bayesian workflow:

Model Checking: The amortized inference network can be used to quickly assess model fit by generating posterior predictive samples and comparing them to the observed data. This allows for rapid exploration of model adequacy.

Parameter Estimation: The amortized network can be leveraged to efficiently explore the posterior distribution of model parameters. By using the network to generate samples from the posterior, researchers can better understand the uncertainty in their parameter estimates.

Posterior Exploration: Applying the amortized network to rapidly generate posterior samples enables researchers to visualize the uncertainty in model predictions, facilitating interpretation and communication of results.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of the amortized Bayesian workflow through several case studies, showing how it can improve the efficiency and accessibility of Bayesian data analysis.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling vision for integrating amortized inference into the Bayesian workflow. However, the authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations:

  • The approach relies on the ability to train an accurate amortized inference network, which can be challenging for complex models or small datasets.
  • There are open questions about how to best initialize and train the amortized network, and how to quantify and account for errors introduced by the approximate inference.
  • The authors note that the amortized workflow may not be suitable for all applications, and that traditional MCMC methods may still be preferred in some cases.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential privacy and security concerns that could arise from using amortized inference networks to rapidly generate posterior samples. Further research is needed to understand the implications and mitigate any risks.

Overall, the amortized Bayesian workflow represents an exciting advancement that could make Bayesian modeling more accessible and efficient. However, users should be aware of the limitations and potential issues, and continue to critically evaluate the suitability and robustness of the approach for their specific applications.

Conclusion

This paper introduces the concept of an "amortized Bayesian workflow", which integrates amortized inference techniques into the traditional Bayesian modeling process. Amortized inference uses a neural network to learn a mapping from observations to posterior distributions, enabling more efficient Bayesian data analysis.

The authors demonstrate how amortized inference can be applied to different stages of the Bayesian workflow, including model checking, parameter estimation, and posterior exploration. By combining the strengths of amortized inference and Bayesian modeling, this approach has the potential to make Bayesian methods more accessible and widely adopted.

While the amortized Bayesian workflow shows promise, the authors acknowledge several caveats and areas for further research. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in bridging the gap between the flexibility of Bayesian analysis and the computational efficiency of modern machine learning techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Amortized Bayesian Workflow (Extended Abstract)
Total Score

0

Amortized Bayesian Workflow (Extended Abstract)

Marvin Schmitt, Chengkun Li, Aki Vehtari, Luigi Acerbi, Paul-Christian Burkner, Stefan T. Radev

Bayesian inference often faces a trade-off between computational speed and sampling accuracy. We propose an adaptive workflow that integrates rapid amortized inference with gold-standard MCMC techniques to achieve both speed and accuracy when performing inference on many observed datasets. Our approach uses principled diagnostics to guide the choice of inference method for each dataset, moving along the Pareto front from fast amortized sampling to slower but guaranteed-accurate MCMC when necessary. By reusing computations across steps, our workflow creates synergies between amortized and MCMC-based inference. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this integrated approach on a generalized extreme value task with 1000 observed data sets, showing 90x time efficiency gains while maintaining high posterior quality.

Read more

9/9/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Neural Methods for Amortised Parameter Inference

Andrew Zammit-Mangion, Matthew Sainsbury-Dale, Raphael Huser

Simulation-based methods for statistical inference have evolved dramatically over the past 50 years, keeping pace with technological advancements. The field is undergoing a new revolution as it embraces the representational capacity of neural networks, optimisation libraries and graphics processing units for learning complex mappings between data and inferential targets. The resulting tools are amortised, in the sense that they allow rapid inference through fast feedforward operations. In this article we review recent progress in the context of point estimation, approximate Bayesian inference, summary-statistic construction, and likelihood approximation. We also cover software, and include a simple illustration to showcase the wide array of tools available for amortised inference and the benefits they offer over Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The article concludes with an overview of relevant topics and an outlook on future research directions.

Read more

6/27/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Sensitivity-Aware Amortized Bayesian Inference

Lasse Elsemuller, Hans Olischlager, Marvin Schmitt, Paul-Christian Burkner, Ullrich Kothe, Stefan T. Radev

Sensitivity analyses reveal the influence of various modeling choices on the outcomes of statistical analyses. While theoretically appealing, they are overwhelmingly inefficient for complex Bayesian models. In this work, we propose sensitivity-aware amortized Bayesian inference (SA-ABI), a multifaceted approach to efficiently integrate sensitivity analyses into simulation-based inference with neural networks. First, we utilize weight sharing to encode the structural similarities between alternative likelihood and prior specifications in the training process with minimal computational overhead. Second, we leverage the rapid inference of neural networks to assess sensitivity to data perturbations and preprocessing steps. In contrast to most other Bayesian approaches, both steps circumvent the costly bottleneck of refitting the model for each choice of likelihood, prior, or data set. Finally, we propose to use deep ensembles to detect sensitivity arising from unreliable approximation (e.g., due to model misspecification). We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in applied modeling problems, ranging from disease outbreak dynamics and global warming thresholds to human decision-making. Our results support sensitivity-aware inference as a default choice for amortized Bayesian workflows, automatically providing modelers with insights into otherwise hidden dimensions.

Read more

5/9/2024

ASPIRE: Iterative Amortized Posterior Inference for Bayesian Inverse Problems
Total Score

0

ASPIRE: Iterative Amortized Posterior Inference for Bayesian Inverse Problems

Rafael Orozco, Ali Siahkoohi, Mathias Louboutin, Felix J. Herrmann

Due to their uncertainty quantification, Bayesian solutions to inverse problems are the framework of choice in applications that are risk averse. These benefits come at the cost of computations that are in general, intractable. New advances in machine learning and variational inference (VI) have lowered the computational barrier by learning from examples. Two VI paradigms have emerged that represent different tradeoffs: amortized and non-amortized. Amortized VI can produce fast results but due to generalizing to many observed datasets it produces suboptimal inference results. Non-amortized VI is slower at inference but finds better posterior approximations since it is specialized towards a single observed dataset. Current amortized VI techniques run into a sub-optimality wall that can not be improved without more expressive neural networks or extra training data. We present a solution that enables iterative improvement of amortized posteriors that uses the same networks architectures and training data. The benefits of our method requires extra computations but these remain frugal since they are based on physics-hybrid methods and summary statistics. Importantly, these computations remain mostly offline thus our method maintains cheap and reusable online evaluation while bridging the approximation gap these two paradigms. We denote our proposed method ASPIRE - Amortized posteriors with Summaries that are Physics-based and Iteratively REfined. We first validate our method on a stylized problem with a known posterior then demonstrate its practical use on a high-dimensional and nonlinear transcranial medical imaging problem with ultrasound. Compared with the baseline and previous methods from the literature our method stands out as an computationally efficient and high-fidelity method for posterior inference.

Read more

5/10/2024