Analyzing the Impact of Splicing Artifacts in Partially Fake Speech Signals

Read original: arXiv:2408.13784 - Published 8/27/2024 by Viola Negroni, Davide Salvi, Paolo Bestagini, Stefano Tubaro
Total Score

0

Analyzing the Impact of Splicing Artifacts in Partially Fake Speech Signals

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Investigates the impact of splicing artifacts in partially fake speech signals
  • Examines how spectral leakage and other splicing defects can be detected and mitigated
  • Proposes techniques to analyze and characterize these artifacts for improved speech synthesis and spoofing detection

Plain English Explanation

This paper explores the challenges posed by splicing artifacts in partially fake speech signals. When creating synthetic speech or "deepfakes", the audio may be spliced together from different sources, leading to noticeable defects.

The researchers investigate how these splicing artifacts can be detected and mitigated. Spectral leakage, where energy from one audio segment "bleeds" into another, is a key issue they examine. By analyzing these artifacts, the team aims to improve both speech synthesis quality and spoofing detection capabilities.

The insights from this work could help trace the source of deepfake audio and develop more robust detection techniques to identify manipulated speech.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides background on spectral leakage and how it can create audible artifacts when splicing speech segments. The researchers then describe experiments where they generated partially fake speech signals and analyzed the resulting waveforms and spectrograms.

They found that splicing points could be clearly identified by examining the discontinuities and unexpected energy patterns in the spectral domain. The team also developed techniques to automatically locate these splicing artifacts, which could aid in both speech synthesis quality assurance and detection of manipulated audio.

The paper concludes by discussing the implications of their findings for speech forensics, spoofing detection, and the broader challenge of ensuring the integrity of audio data in an era of increasingly sophisticated synthesis capabilities.

Critical Analysis

The research provides valuable insights into the nature of splicing artifacts and their impact on speech signals. However, the experiments were conducted on a limited dataset, so the generalizability of the results may be constrained. Additionally, the paper does not explore how these artifacts might evolve as speech synthesis techniques become more advanced.

Further research is needed to understand the full range of splicing defects that can occur, as well as how they might be mitigated through improved signal processing or generative modeling approaches. The long-term viability of relying on such artifacts for detection also remains an open question as synthesis capabilities continue to improve.

Conclusion

This paper offers an in-depth analysis of the challenges posed by splicing artifacts in partially fake speech signals. By characterizing the spectral leakage and other defects introduced by audio splicing, the researchers lay the groundwork for enhanced speech synthesis quality and more robust spoofing detection systems. Their findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to ensure the integrity of audio data in the face of increasingly sophisticated manipulation capabilities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

Analyzing the Impact of Splicing Artifacts in Partially Fake Speech Signals
Total Score

0

Analyzing the Impact of Splicing Artifacts in Partially Fake Speech Signals

Viola Negroni, Davide Salvi, Paolo Bestagini, Stefano Tubaro

Speech deepfake detection has recently gained significant attention within the multimedia forensics community. Related issues have also been explored, such as the identification of partially fake signals, i.e., tracks that include both real and fake speech segments. However, generating high-quality spliced audio is not as straightforward as it may appear. Spliced signals are typically created through basic signal concatenation. This process could introduce noticeable artifacts that can make the generated data easier to detect. We analyze spliced audio tracks resulting from signal concatenation, investigate their artifacts and assess whether such artifacts introduce any bias in existing datasets. Our findings reveal that by analyzing splicing artifacts, we can achieve a detection EER of 6.16% and 7.36% on PartialSpoof and HAD datasets, respectively, without needing to train any detector. These results underscore the complexities of generating reliable spliced audio data and lead to discussions that can help improve future research in this area.

Read more

8/27/2024

How Do Neural Spoofing Countermeasures Detect Partially Spoofed Audio?
Total Score

0

How Do Neural Spoofing Countermeasures Detect Partially Spoofed Audio?

Tianchi Liu, Lin Zhang, Rohan Kumar Das, Yi Ma, Ruijie Tao, Haizhou Li

Partially manipulating a sentence can greatly change its meaning. Recent work shows that countermeasures (CMs) trained on partially spoofed audio can effectively detect such spoofing. However, the current understanding of the decision-making process of CMs is limited. We utilize Grad-CAM and introduce a quantitative analysis metric to interpret CMs' decisions. We find that CMs prioritize the artifacts of transition regions created when concatenating bona fide and spoofed audio. This focus differs from that of CMs trained on fully spoofed audio, which concentrate on the pattern differences between bona fide and spoofed parts. Our further investigation explains the varying nature of CMs' focus while making correct or incorrect predictions. These insights provide a basis for the design of CM models and the creation of datasets. Moreover, this work lays a foundation of interpretability in the field of partial spoofed audio detection that has not been well explored previously.

Read more

6/5/2024

Point to the Hidden: Exposing Speech Audio Splicing via Signal Pointer Nets
Total Score

0

Point to the Hidden: Exposing Speech Audio Splicing via Signal Pointer Nets

Denise Moussa, Germans Hirsch, Sebastian Wankerl, Christian Riess

Verifying the integrity of voice recording evidence for criminal investigations is an integral part of an audio forensic analyst's work. Here, one focus is on detecting deletion or insertion operations, so called audio splicing. While this is a rather easy approach to alter spoken statements, careful editing can yield quite convincing results. For difficult cases or big amounts of data, automated tools can support in detecting potential editing locations. To this end, several analytical and deep learning methods have been proposed by now. Still, few address unconstrained splicing scenarios as expected in practice. With SigPointer, we propose a pointer network framework for continuous input that uncovers splice locations naturally and more efficiently than existing works. Extensive experiments on forensically challenging data like strongly compressed and noisy signals quantify the benefit of the pointer mechanism with performance increases between about 6 to 10 percentage points.

Read more

5/6/2024

šŸŒ€

Total Score

0

Audio Anti-Spoofing Detection: A Survey

Menglu Li, Yasaman Ahmadiadli, Xiao-Ping Zhang

The availability of smart devices leads to an exponential increase in multimedia content. However, the rapid advancements in deep learning have given rise to sophisticated algorithms capable of manipulating or creating multimedia fake content, known as Deepfake. Audio Deepfakes pose a significant threat by producing highly realistic voices, thus facilitating the spread of misinformation. To address this issue, numerous audio anti-spoofing detection challenges have been organized to foster the development of anti-spoofing countermeasures. This survey paper presents a comprehensive review of every component within the detection pipeline, including algorithm architectures, optimization techniques, application generalizability, evaluation metrics, performance comparisons, available datasets, and open-source availability. For each aspect, we conduct a systematic evaluation of the recent advancements, along with discussions on existing challenges. Additionally, we also explore emerging research topics on audio anti-spoofing, including partial spoofing detection, cross-dataset evaluation, and adversarial attack defence, while proposing some promising research directions for future work. This survey paper not only identifies the current state-of-the-art to establish strong baselines for future experiments but also guides future researchers on a clear path for understanding and enhancing the audio anti-spoofing detection mechanisms.

Read more

4/23/2024