AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agents

Overview

• The paper describes the development of a high-quality execution environment called AppWorld Engine and a benchmark suite called AppWorld Benchmark to assess the capabilities of autonomous agents that perform day-to-day digital tasks.
• Existing benchmarks are inadequate as they only cover tasks that require a simple sequence of API calls, while real-world tasks often require complex code generation and interaction with multiple applications.
• The AppWorld Engine simulates the lives of ~100 fictitious users and their digital activities across 9 common apps, accessible via 457 APIs.
• The AppWorld Benchmark contains 750 diverse and challenging tasks that require rich and interactive code generation by autonomous agents.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you have a digital assistant that can help you with your everyday tasks, like ordering groceries, managing your calendar, and sending messages. To do these tasks, the assistant needs to be able to use multiple apps and services, and generate complex code that can adapt to different situations.

However, the current tests and benchmarks for these types of digital assistants are not very good. They only focus on tasks that involve a simple sequence of steps, like calling an API to place an order. They don't really test the assistant's ability to handle more complex, real-world situations.

To address this, the researchers created the AppWorld Engine and the AppWorld Benchmark. The AppWorld Engine is a detailed simulation of the digital lives of around 100 people, with 9 different apps and 457 APIs that the assistant can use. The AppWorld Benchmark then presents the assistant with 750 diverse and challenging tasks that require the assistant to generate complex code and adapt to different situations.

By testing digital assistants on the AppWorld Benchmark, the researchers can get a better idea of their true capabilities and limitations. The results so far show that even the most advanced language models, like GPT-4, can only solve about half of the 'normal' tasks and 30% of the 'challenge' tasks. This highlights the difficulty of the benchmark and the need for further advancements in interactive coding agents.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed the AppWorld Engine, a high-quality execution environment with 60,000 lines of code, that simulates the digital lives of ~100 fictitious users across 9 common apps, accessible via 457 APIs. This provides a realistic and diverse set of digital activities for autonomous agents to interact with.

They then created the AppWorld Benchmark, a suite of 750 natural, diverse, and challenging tasks that require autonomous agents to generate rich and interactive code. The benchmark supports robust programmatic evaluation with state-based unit tests, allowing for different ways of completing a task while also checking for unexpected changes or collateral damage.

The researchers evaluated the state-of-the-art language model, GPT-4, on the AppWorld Benchmark and found that it could only solve ~49% of the 'normal' tasks and ~30% of the 'challenge' tasks. Other models performed even worse, solving at least 16% fewer tasks. This highlights the difficulty of the benchmark and the need for further advancements in interactive coding agents that can handle complex, real-world tasks involving multiple applications and dynamic environments.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that the AppWorld Benchmark is a significant challenge for current state-of-the-art language models, as it requires agents to generate rich and interactive code based on their interaction with a diverse set of digital applications and activities.

However, the paper does not explore the specific reasons why these models struggle with the benchmark tasks. It would be helpful to understand the particular capabilities or limitations of the models that lead to their relatively poor performance, as this could inform future research directions.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential biases or limitations of the AppWorld Engine and AppWorld Benchmark themselves. It's possible that the simulation and tasks may not fully capture the complexity and diversity of real-world digital activities, which could affect the generalizability of the results.

Further research could also explore the potential applications and use cases of the AppWorld Engine and AppWorld Benchmark, beyond just evaluating autonomous agent capabilities. For example, they could be used to train and develop more robust interactive coding agents or to study human-AI collaboration in complex, multi-app digital environments.

Conclusion

The AppWorld Engine and AppWorld Benchmark represent a significant advancement in the field of autonomous agent evaluation, as they provide a more realistic and diverse set of digital tasks that require complex code generation and interaction with multiple applications.

The benchmark results highlight the limitations of current state-of-the-art language models in solving these types of real-world, interactive tasks, and suggest that further advancements in interactive coding agents are needed to address the challenges posed by the AppWorld Benchmark.

Overall, the AppWorld project has the potential to push the frontiers of autonomous agent research and development, and could lead to the creation of more capable and versatile digital assistants that can better support our day-to-day digital lives.