Archive-based Single-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Submodular Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents new archive-based single-objective evolutionary algorithms (EAs) for solving submodular optimization problems.
- Submodular optimization problems arise in various applications, such as sensor placement, social network analysis, and image segmentation.
- The proposed algorithms leverage an archive to maintain and update a set of high-quality solutions, improving the search efficiency and solution quality.
Plain English Explanation
Optimization problems are about finding the best solution from a set of possible solutions. In many real-world problems, the goal is to maximize or minimize some measure of performance, like profit or cost. Submodular optimization is a specific type of optimization problem where the performance measure has a particular mathematical property.
The authors of this paper developed new evolutionary algorithms (EAs) to solve submodular optimization problems. EAs are a type of optimization technique that mimics the process of natural selection, where better solutions are more likely to "survive" and be used to generate new, potentially even better solutions.
The key innovation in this paper is the use of an "archive" - a set of high-quality solutions that the algorithm keeps track of and updates over time. By maintaining this archive, the algorithms can more efficiently explore the space of possible solutions and find better results.
The authors tested their new archive-based EAs on a variety of submodular optimization problems and showed that they outperform traditional EAs in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces two new archive-based single-objective evolutionary algorithms for submodular optimization: Archive-based Evolutionary Algorithm (AEA) and Improved Archive-based Evolutionary Algorithm (IAEA).
The core idea is to maintain an archive, which is a set of high-quality solutions found during the optimization process. The archive is updated using a novel archive update mechanism that ensures diversity and high-quality solutions are preserved.
The AEA algorithm uses the archive in two ways: (1) to guide the search by biasing the selection of parents towards solutions in the archive, and (2) to directly insert archive solutions into the population. The IAEA algorithm further improves upon AEA by incorporating a novel mutation operator that leverages information from the archive.
The authors conduct extensive experiments on a variety of submodular optimization problems, including sensor placement, social network analysis, and image segmentation. They show that the proposed archive-based algorithms outperform traditional single-objective evolutionary algorithms in terms of solution quality and computational efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study of the proposed archive-based evolutionary algorithms for submodular optimization. The authors have clearly identified the limitations of existing approaches and have made significant contributions to address these limitations.
One potential limitation of the research is the focus on single-objective optimization. Many real-world problems involve multiple, often conflicting objectives. While the authors mention the possibility of extending their approach to multi-objective optimization, it would be interesting to see how the archive-based algorithms perform in that setting.
Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the scalability of the proposed algorithms. As the problem size and complexity increase, the performance and computational efficiency of the algorithms may be affected. Further investigation into the scalability of the methods would be beneficial.
Another area for potential improvement is the handling of constraints. Many practical optimization problems involve various constraints, and it would be valuable to explore how the archive-based algorithms can be adapted to handle such constraints effectively.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to solving submodular optimization problems using archive-based single-objective evolutionary algorithms. The key contribution is the incorporation of an archive to maintain and update a set of high-quality solutions, which significantly improves the search efficiency and solution quality compared to traditional EAs.
The proposed algorithms have shown promising results on a range of submodular optimization problems, demonstrating their potential for practical applications. While the focus is on single-objective optimization, the ideas presented in this work could be further extended to multi-objective settings and constrained optimization problems, opening up new avenues for research and real-world problem-solving.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Archive-based Single-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Submodular Optimization
Frank Neumann, Gunter Rudolph
Constrained submodular optimization problems play a key role in the area of combinatorial optimization as they capture many NP-hard optimization problems. So far, Pareto optimization approaches using multi-objective formulations have been shown to be successful to tackle these problems while single-objective formulations lead to difficulties for algorithms such as the $(1+1)$-EA due to the presence of local optima. We introduce for the first time single-objective algorithms that are provably successful for different classes of constrained submodular maximization problems. Our algorithms are variants of the $(1+lambda)$-EA and $(1+1)$-EA and increase the feasible region of the search space incrementally in order to deal with the considered submodular problems.
Read more6/21/2024
🛠️
0
Runtime Analysis of Single- and Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Chance Constrained Optimization Problems with Normally Distributed Random Variables
Frank Neumann, Carsten Witt
Chance constrained optimization problems allow to model problems where constraints involving stochastic components should only be violated with a small probability. Evolutionary algorithms have been applied to this scenario and shown to achieve high quality results. With this paper, we contribute to the theoretical understanding of evolutionary algorithms for chance constrained optimization. We study the scenario of stochastic components that are independent and normally distributed. Considering the simple single-objective (1+1) EA, we show that imposing an additional uniform constraint already leads to local optima for very restricted scenarios and an exponential optimization time. We therefore introduce a multi-objective formulation of the problem which trades off the expected cost and its variance. We show that multi-objective evolutionary algorithms are highly effective when using this formulation and obtain a set of solutions that contains an optimal solution for any possible confidence level imposed on the constraint. Furthermore, we prove that this approach can also be used to compute a set of optimal solutions for the chance constrained minimum spanning tree problem. In order to deal with potentially exponentially many trade-offs in the multi-objective formulation, we propose and analyze improved convex multi-objective approaches. Experimental investigations on instances of the NP-hard stochastic minimum weight dominating set problem confirm the benefit of the multi-objective and the improved convex multi-objective approach in practice.
Read more8/23/2024
🛠️
0
An Efficient Approach for Solving Expensive Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems
Kamrul Hasan Rahi
To solve real-world expensive constrained multi-objective optimization problems (ECMOPs), surrogate/approximation models are commonly incorporated in evolutionary algorithms to pre-select promising candidate solutions for evaluation. However, the performance of existing approaches are highly dependent on the relative position of unconstrained and constrained Pareto fronts (UPF and CPF, respectively). In addition, the uncertainty information of surrogate models is often ignored, which can misguide the search. To mitigate these key issues (among others), an efficient probabilistic selection based constrained multi-objective EA is proposed, referred to as PSCMOEA. It comprises novel elements such as (a) an adaptive search bound identification scheme based on the feasibility and convergence status of evaluated solutions (b) a probabilistic selection method backed by theoretical formulations of model mean and uncertainties to conduct search in the predicted space to identify promising solutions (c) an efficient single infill sampling approach to balance feasibility, convergence and diversity across different stages of the search and (d) an adaptive switch to unconstrained search based on certain search conditions. Numerical experiments are conducted on an extensive range of challenging constrained problems using low evaluation budgets to simulate ECMOPs. The performance of PSCMOEA is benchmarked against five competitive state-of-the-art algorithms, to demonstrate its competitive and consistent performance.
Read more5/24/2024
⚙️
0
Dealing with Structure Constraints in Evolutionary Pareto Set Learning
Xi Lin, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Zhiyuan Yang, Qingfu Zhang
In the past few decades, many multiobjective evolutionary optimization algorithms (MOEAs) have been proposed to find a finite set of approximate Pareto solutions for a given problem in a single run, each with its own structure. However, in many real-world applications, it could be desirable to have structure constraints on the entire optimal solution set, which define the patterns shared among all solutions. The current population-based MOEAs cannot properly handle such requirements. In this work, we make the first attempt to incorporate the structure constraints into the whole solution set by a single Pareto set model, which can be efficiently learned by a simple evolutionary stochastic optimization method. With our proposed method, the decision-makers can flexibly trade off the Pareto optimality with preferred structures among all solutions, which is not supported by previous MOEAs. A set of experiments on benchmark test suites and real-world application problems fully demonstrates the efficiency of our proposed method.
Read more4/30/2024