Assessment of Uncertainty Quantification in Universal Differential Equations
2406.08853
0
0
Abstract
Scientific Machine Learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques for uncovering governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) are used to combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, like neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters within mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. The robustness and applicability of resultant models, however, hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with these parameters, as well as the predictive capabilities of the overall model or its constituent components. With this work, we provide a formalisation of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate important frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analysing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the topic of uncertainty quantification (UQ) in the context of universal differential equations (UDEs), which are a type of neural network architecture that can represent a broad class of differential equations.
- The researchers propose a tailored definition of uncertainty for UDEs, which aims to capture the precision of the model's predictions in a more nuanced way than traditional UQ approaches.
- The paper presents a framework for assessing the uncertainty of UDE models and compares it to other UQ techniques, such as leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification and a comprehensive survey of uncertainty quantification in deep learning.
Plain English Explanation
In this paper, the researchers are looking at how to measure the uncertainty, or the level of precision, in the predictions made by a special type of neural network called a universal differential equation (UDE). UDEs are designed to be able to represent a wide range of differential equations, which are mathematical equations that describe how things change over time.
The researchers argue that the traditional ways of measuring uncertainty in machine learning models don't really work well for UDEs. So, they've come up with a new, more tailored way of defining and measuring the uncertainty in UDE models. This new approach aims to capture the precision of the model's predictions in a more nuanced and meaningful way.
The paper presents a framework for assessing the uncertainty of UDE models and compares it to other techniques for quantifying uncertainty in machine learning, like using uncertainty quantification to characterize and improve out-of-distribution robustness and a structured review of the literature on uncertainty in machine learning and deep learning.
The key idea is to develop a better way to measure how precise and reliable the predictions from UDE models are, which could be important for a wide range of applications where understanding the uncertainty in the predictions is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the limitations of traditional uncertainty quantification (UQ) approaches when applied to universal differential equations (UDEs). UDEs are a type of neural network architecture that can represent a broad class of differential equations, and the researchers argue that existing UQ methods do not adequately capture the unique properties of these models.
To address this, the authors propose a tailored definition of uncertainty for UDEs, which they call "precision." This notion of precision is designed to quantify the reliability and consistency of the model's predictions, taking into account the specific characteristics of UDEs. The paper presents a framework for assessing the precision of UDE models, which involves leveraging the structure of the UDE architecture to compute uncertainty estimates.
The proposed precision-based UQ approach is compared to other UQ techniques, such as physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and using uncertainty quantification to characterize and improve out-of-distribution robustness. The authors demonstrate that their precision-based method can provide more meaningful and informative uncertainty estimates for UDE models, which could have important implications for a wide range of applications where understanding the reliability of predictions is crucial.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling case for the need to develop more tailored uncertainty quantification methods for universal differential equations (UDEs). The authors' proposed definition of "precision" as a measure of uncertainty is an interesting and potentially valuable contribution, as it seeks to capture the unique properties of UDE models that are not well-addressed by traditional UQ approaches.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the precision-based UQ framework, and there are some limitations that could be further explored. For example, the paper only compares the precision-based method to a few other UQ techniques, and it would be beneficial to see how it performs against a wider range of UQ approaches, including a comprehensive survey of uncertainty quantification in deep learning and a structured review of the literature on uncertainty in machine learning and deep learning.
Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the potential benefits of the precision-based UQ method, it does not delve into the practical challenges or limitations of implementing this approach in real-world scenarios. Further research may be needed to address issues such as computational complexity, sensitivity to hyperparameters, and the generalizability of the method to different types of UDE models and applications.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and potentially important contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification for universal differential equations. However, additional research and evaluation may be necessary to fully assess the strengths, weaknesses, and broader implications of the precision-based UQ framework.
Conclusion
This paper explores a novel approach to uncertainty quantification (UQ) for universal differential equations (UDEs), a type of neural network architecture that can represent a broad class of differential equations. The researchers propose a tailored definition of uncertainty, called "precision," which aims to capture the reliability and consistency of the model's predictions in a more nuanced way than traditional UQ methods.
The paper presents a framework for assessing the precision of UDE models and compares it to other UQ techniques, such as physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and using uncertainty quantification to characterize and improve out-of-distribution robustness. The researchers demonstrate that their precision-based approach can provide more meaningful and informative uncertainty estimates for UDE models, which could have important implications for a wide range of applications where understanding the reliability of predictions is crucial.
Overall, this paper offers a promising new direction for uncertainty quantification in the context of universal differential equations, and the proposed precision-based framework could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working in this area. However, further research and evaluation may be needed to fully assess the strengths, weaknesses, and practical implications of this approach.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning
Zongren Zou, Tingwei Meng, Paula Chen, J'er^ome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis
0
0
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in scientific machine learning (SciML) combines the powerful predictive power of SciML with methods for quantifying the reliability of the learned models. However, two major challenges remain: limited interpretability and expensive training procedures. We provide a new interpretation for UQ problems by establishing a new theoretical connection between some Bayesian inference problems arising in SciML and viscous Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equations (HJ PDEs). Namely, we show that the posterior mean and covariance can be recovered from the spatial gradient and Hessian of the solution to a viscous HJ PDE. As a first exploration of this connection, we specialize to Bayesian inference problems with linear models, Gaussian likelihoods, and Gaussian priors. In this case, the associated viscous HJ PDEs can be solved using Riccati ODEs, and we develop a new Riccati-based methodology that provides computational advantages when continuously updating the model predictions. Specifically, our Riccati-based approach can efficiently add or remove data points to the training set invariant to the order of the data and continuously tune hyperparameters. Moreover, neither update requires retraining on or access to previously incorporated data. We provide several examples from SciML involving noisy data and textit{epistemic uncertainty} to illustrate the potential advantages of our approach. In particular, this approach's amenability to data streaming applications demonstrates its potential for real-time inferences, which, in turn, allows for applications in which the predicted uncertainty is used to dynamically alter the learning process.
4/16/2024
Non-Negative Universal Differential Equations With Applications in Systems Biology
Maren Philipps, Antonia Korner, Jakob Vanhoefer, Dilan Pathirana, Jan Hasenauer
0
0
Universal differential equations (UDEs) leverage the respective advantages of mechanistic models and artificial neural networks and combine them into one dynamic model. However, these hybrid models can suffer from unrealistic solutions, such as negative values for biochemical quantities. We present non-negative UDE (nUDEs), a constrained UDE variant that guarantees non-negative values. Furthermore, we explore regularisation techniques to improve generalisation and interpretability of UDEs.
6/21/2024
🤿
A Comprehensive Survey on Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning
Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved tremendous success in making accurate predictions for computer vision, natural language processing, as well as science and engineering domains. However, it is also well-recognized that DNNs sometimes make unexpected, incorrect, but overconfident predictions. This can cause serious consequences in high-stake applications, such as autonomous driving, medical diagnosis, and disaster response. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) aims to estimate the confidence of DNN predictions beyond prediction accuracy. In recent years, many UQ methods have been developed for DNNs. It is of great practical value to systematically categorize these UQ methods and compare their advantages and disadvantages. However, existing surveys mostly focus on categorizing UQ methodologies from a neural network architecture perspective or a Bayesian perspective and ignore the source of uncertainty that each methodology can incorporate, making it difficult to select an appropriate UQ method in practice. To fill the gap, this paper presents a systematic taxonomy of UQ methods for DNNs based on the types of uncertainty sources (data uncertainty versus model uncertainty). We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of methods in each category. We show how our taxonomy of UQ methodologies can potentially help guide the choice of UQ method in different machine learning problems (e.g., active learning, robustness, and reinforcement learning). We also identify current research gaps and propose several future research directions.
4/11/2024
Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantification
Himanshu Sharma, Luk'av{s} Nov'ak, Michael D. Shields
0
0
We present a novel physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion as a surrogate modeling method capable of performing both scientific machine learning (SciML) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks. The proposed method possesses a unique capability: it seamlessly integrates SciML into UQ and vice versa, which allows it to quantify the uncertainties in SciML tasks effectively and leverage SciML for improved uncertainty assessment during UQ-related tasks. The proposed surrogate model can effectively incorporate a variety of physical constraints, such as governing partial differential equations (PDEs) with associated initial and boundary conditions constraints, inequality-type constraints (e.g., monotonicity, convexity, non-negativity, among others), and additional a priori information in the training process to supplement limited data. This ensures physically realistic predictions and significantly reduces the need for expensive computational model evaluations to train the surrogate model. Furthermore, the proposed method has a built-in uncertainty quantification (UQ) feature to efficiently estimate output uncertainties. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we apply it to a diverse set of problems, including linear/non-linear PDEs with deterministic and stochastic parameters, data-driven surrogate modeling of a complex physical system, and UQ of a stochastic system with parameters modeled as random fields.
5/14/2024