Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning

2404.08809

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/16/2024 by Zongren Zou, Tingwei Meng, Paula Chen, J'er^ome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis
Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in scientific machine learning (SciML) combines the powerful predictive power of SciML with methods for quantifying the reliability of the learned models. However, two major challenges remain: limited interpretability and expensive training procedures. We provide a new interpretation for UQ problems by establishing a new theoretical connection between some Bayesian inference problems arising in SciML and viscous Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equations (HJ PDEs). Namely, we show that the posterior mean and covariance can be recovered from the spatial gradient and Hessian of the solution to a viscous HJ PDE. As a first exploration of this connection, we specialize to Bayesian inference problems with linear models, Gaussian likelihoods, and Gaussian priors. In this case, the associated viscous HJ PDEs can be solved using Riccati ODEs, and we develop a new Riccati-based methodology that provides computational advantages when continuously updating the model predictions. Specifically, our Riccati-based approach can efficiently add or remove data points to the training set invariant to the order of the data and continuously tune hyperparameters. Moreover, neither update requires retraining on or access to previously incorporated data. We provide several examples from SciML involving noisy data and textit{epistemic uncertainty} to illustrate the potential advantages of our approach. In particular, this approach's amenability to data streaming applications demonstrates its potential for real-time inferences, which, in turn, allows for applications in which the predicted uncertainty is used to dynamically alter the learning process.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of viscous Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) partial differential equations (PDEs) for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning.
  • It proposes a framework that connects viscous HJ PDEs to Bayesian inference, allowing for efficient uncertainty quantification in machine learning models.
  • The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through various experiments and applications.

Plain English Explanation

Leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs for uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning

This research paper explores a novel way to understand and quantify the uncertainty in machine learning models. Machine learning models are often used to make predictions or decisions, but it's important to understand how confident the model is in its output. This is known as uncertainty quantification.

The researchers in this paper propose using a mathematical tool called viscous Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) partial differential equations (PDEs) to model the uncertainty in machine learning models. Partial differential equations are a type of advanced mathematical equation that can be used to describe complex systems.

The key insight is that there is a connection between these viscous HJ PDEs and a statistical technique called Bayesian inference. Bayesian inference is a way of updating our beliefs about the world based on new evidence. The researchers show that by using viscous HJ PDEs, we can efficiently perform Bayesian inference and quantify the uncertainty in machine learning models.

This approach can be particularly useful for enhancing the trustworthiness of ML-based network intrusion detection systems, as well as for probabilistic uncertainty quantification and prediction in various application domains.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through various experiments and applications, showing how it can be used to quantify uncertainty in a wide range of machine learning tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper connects viscous HJ PDEs to Bayesian inference in machine learning, providing a framework for efficient uncertainty quantification. This is achieved by relating the solution of the viscous HJ PDE to the posterior distribution in Bayesian inference.

The key steps in the technical approach are:

  1. Formulating the machine learning problem as a viscous HJ PDE, where the value function represents the negative log-posterior.
  2. Deriving a numerical scheme to solve the viscous HJ PDE, which allows for efficient computation of the posterior distribution.
  3. Demonstrating the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on various machine learning tasks, including regression, classification, and reinforcement learning.

The paper also provides theoretical analysis, showing that the viscous HJ PDE framework can be used to approximate Bayesian posterior distributions with guaranteed convergence properties.

The proposed approach is a significant contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification in deep learning, providing a principled and efficient way to assess the reliability of machine learning models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to uncertainty quantification in machine learning, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The paper focuses primarily on theoretical analysis and synthetic experiments, and more work is needed to demonstrate the practical applicability of the viscous HJ PDE framework on real-world, large-scale machine learning problems.

  2. The numerical scheme used to solve the viscous HJ PDE may become computationally expensive for high-dimensional problems, and further research is needed to develop more efficient numerical methods.

  3. The paper does not address the issue of model misspecification, where the assumed model may not accurately reflect the true underlying data-generating process. Addressing this challenge could further improve the reliability of uncertainty quantification.

  4. The paper could have provided more discussion on the potential limitations of the viscous HJ PDE approach, such as the assumptions required for the theoretical analysis or the sensitivity of the method to hyperparameter choices.

Overall, the paper presents a promising and theoretically grounded approach to uncertainty quantification in machine learning, but further research is needed to address the practical challenges and limitations mentioned above.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel framework for uncertainty quantification in machine learning by leveraging viscous Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equations. The key insight is the connection between these PDEs and Bayesian inference, which allows for efficient computation of posterior distributions and quantification of model uncertainty.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through various experiments and applications, showing its potential to enhance the trustworthiness and reliability of machine learning models. While there are some limitations and areas for further research, the viscous HJ PDE framework represents a significant contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification in scientific machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🌿

Leveraging Hamilton-Jacobi PDEs with time-dependent Hamiltonians for continual scientific machine learning

Paula Chen, Tingwei Meng, Zongren Zou, J'er^ome Darbon, George Em Karniadakis

YC

0

Reddit

0

We address two major challenges in scientific machine learning (SciML): interpretability and computational efficiency. We increase the interpretability of certain learning processes by establishing a new theoretical connection between optimization problems arising from SciML and a generalized Hopf formula, which represents the viscosity solution to a Hamilton-Jacobi partial differential equation (HJ PDE) with time-dependent Hamiltonian. Namely, we show that when we solve certain regularized learning problems with integral-type losses, we actually solve an optimal control problem and its associated HJ PDE with time-dependent Hamiltonian. This connection allows us to reinterpret incremental updates to learned models as the evolution of an associated HJ PDE and optimal control problem in time, where all of the previous information is intrinsically encoded in the solution to the HJ PDE. As a result, existing HJ PDE solvers and optimal control algorithms can be reused to design new efficient training approaches for SciML that naturally coincide with the continual learning framework, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. As a first exploration of this connection, we consider the special case of linear regression and leverage our connection to develop a new Riccati-based methodology for solving these learning problems that is amenable to continual learning applications. We also provide some corresponding numerical examples that demonstrate the potential computational and memory advantages our Riccati-based approach can provide.

Read more

5/8/2024

Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantification

Physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion for scientific machine learning and uncertainty quantification

Himanshu Sharma, Luk'av{s} Nov'ak, Michael D. Shields

YC

0

Reddit

0

We present a novel physics-constrained polynomial chaos expansion as a surrogate modeling method capable of performing both scientific machine learning (SciML) and uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks. The proposed method possesses a unique capability: it seamlessly integrates SciML into UQ and vice versa, which allows it to quantify the uncertainties in SciML tasks effectively and leverage SciML for improved uncertainty assessment during UQ-related tasks. The proposed surrogate model can effectively incorporate a variety of physical constraints, such as governing partial differential equations (PDEs) with associated initial and boundary conditions constraints, inequality-type constraints (e.g., monotonicity, convexity, non-negativity, among others), and additional a priori information in the training process to supplement limited data. This ensures physically realistic predictions and significantly reduces the need for expensive computational model evaluations to train the surrogate model. Furthermore, the proposed method has a built-in uncertainty quantification (UQ) feature to efficiently estimate output uncertainties. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we apply it to a diverse set of problems, including linear/non-linear PDEs with deterministic and stochastic parameters, data-driven surrogate modeling of a complex physical system, and UQ of a stochastic system with parameters modeled as random fields.

Read more

5/14/2024

Assessment of Uncertainty Quantification in Universal Differential Equations

Assessment of Uncertainty Quantification in Universal Differential Equations

Nina Schmid, David Fernandes del Pozo, Willem Waegeman, Jan Hasenauer

YC

0

Reddit

0

Scientific Machine Learning is a new class of approaches that integrate physical knowledge and mechanistic models with data-driven techniques for uncovering governing equations of complex processes. Among the available approaches, Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) are used to combine prior knowledge in the form of mechanistic formulations with universal function approximators, like neural networks. Integral to the efficacy of UDEs is the joint estimation of parameters within mechanistic formulations and the universal function approximators using empirical data. The robustness and applicability of resultant models, however, hinge upon the rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with these parameters, as well as the predictive capabilities of the overall model or its constituent components. With this work, we provide a formalisation of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for UDEs and investigate important frequentist and Bayesian methods. By analysing three synthetic examples of varying complexity, we evaluate the validity and efficiency of ensembles, variational inference and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling as epistemic UQ methods for UDEs.

Read more

6/14/2024

Using Uncertainty Quantification to Characterize and Improve Out-of-Domain Learning for PDEs

Using Uncertainty Quantification to Characterize and Improve Out-of-Domain Learning for PDEs

S. Chandra Mouli, Danielle C. Maddix, Shima Alizadeh, Gaurav Gupta, Andrew Stuart, Michael W. Mahoney, Yuyang Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

Existing work in scientific machine learning (SciML) has shown that data-driven learning of solution operators can provide a fast approximate alternative to classical numerical partial differential equation (PDE) solvers. Of these, Neural Operators (NOs) have emerged as particularly promising. We observe that several uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for NOs fail for test inputs that are even moderately out-of-domain (OOD), even when the model approximates the solution well for in-domain tasks. To address this limitation, we show that ensembling several NOs can identify high-error regions and provide good uncertainty estimates that are well-correlated with prediction errors. Based on this, we propose a cost-effective alternative, DiverseNO, that mimics the properties of the ensemble by encouraging diverse predictions from its multiple heads in the last feed-forward layer. We then introduce Operator-ProbConserv, a method that uses these well-calibrated UQ estimates within the ProbConserv framework to update the model. Our empirical results show that Operator-ProbConserv enhances OOD model performance for a variety of challenging PDE problems and satisfies physical constraints such as conservation laws.

Read more

6/13/2024