Asynchronous Fault-Tolerant Distributed Proper Coloring of Graphs
0
👨🏫
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses an asynchronous, fault-tolerant distributed algorithm for properly coloring graphs.
- The algorithm is designed to work in networks with asynchronous communication and node failures.
- The key result is that the algorithm can properly color graphs with the minimum number of colors required.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to color the nodes of a network or graph in an asynchronous and fault-tolerant manner. Coloring the nodes of a graph simply means assigning a unique color to each node so that no two neighboring nodes have the same color. This is a fundamental problem in computer science with many practical applications.
The proposed algorithm can work even when the nodes in the network are not perfectly synchronized and when some nodes may fail or stop working. This is an important feature, as real-world networks are often asynchronous and unreliable. The key innovation is that the algorithm can still properly color the graph using the minimum number of colors required, despite these challenges.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces an asynchronous, fault-tolerant distributed algorithm for properly coloring graphs. The algorithm works by having each node in the network communicate with its neighbors to coordinate the choice of colors.
The algorithm is designed to be resilient to node failures and asynchronous communication between nodes. This is achieved through the use of various techniques, such as asynchronous handshaking and dynamic color adjustment.
The key result is that the algorithm is proven to properly color the graph using the minimum number of colors required, even in the presence of asynchrony and node failures.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough theoretical analysis of the algorithm's correctness and performance. However, the authors do not discuss any practical implementation details or experimental results. It would be helpful to see how the algorithm performs in real-world scenarios and how it compares to other distributed coloring algorithms.
Additionally, the paper does not mention any potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For example, it's unclear how the algorithm would scale to very large or dynamic networks, or how it would handle Byzantine failures, where some nodes may behave maliciously.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel asynchronous, fault-tolerant distributed algorithm for properly coloring graphs. The key contribution is that the algorithm can achieve the minimum number of colors required, even in the presence of asynchronous communication and node failures. While the theoretical analysis is strong, more practical evaluation would be needed to fully assess the algorithm's real-world applicability and limitations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👨🏫
0
Asynchronous Fault-Tolerant Distributed Proper Coloring of Graphs
Alkida Balliu, Pierre Fraigniaud, Patrick Lambein-Monette, Dennis Olivetti, Mikael Rabie
We revisit asynchronous computing in networks of crash-prone processes, under the asynchronous variant of the standard LOCAL model, recently introduced by Fraigniaud et al. [DISC 2022]. We focus on the vertex coloring problem, and our contributions concern both lower and upper bounds for this problem. On the upper bound side, we design an algorithm tolerating an arbitrarily large number of crash failures that computes an $O(Delta^2)$-coloring of any $n$-node graph of maximum degree $Delta$, in $O(log^star n)$ rounds. This extends Linial's seminal result from the (synchronous failure-free) LOCAL model to its asynchronous crash-prone variant. Then, by allowing a dependency on $Delta$ on the runtime, we show that we can reduce the colors to $big(frac12(Delta+1)(Delta+2)-1 big)$. For cycles (i.e., for $Delta=2$), our algorithm achieves a 5-coloring of any $n$-node cycle, in $O(log^star n)$ rounds. This improves the known 6-coloring algorithm by Fraigniaud et al., and fixes a bug in their algorithm, which was erroneously claimed to produce a 5-coloring. On the lower bound side, we show that, for $k<5$, and for every prime integer~$n$, no algorithm can $k$-color the $n$-node cycle in the asynchronous crash-prone variant of LOCAL, independently from the round-complexities of the algorithms. This lower bound is obtained by reduction from an original extension of the impossibility of solving weak symmetry-breaking in the wait-free shared-memory model. We show that this impossibility still holds even if the processes are provided with inputs susceptible to help breaking symmetry.
Read more8/21/2024
➖
0
Decentralized Distributed Graph Coloring: Cluster Graphs
Maxime Flin, Magnus M. Halldorsson, Alexandre Nolin
Graph coloring is fundamental to distributed computing. We give an ultrafast distributed algorithm for coloring cluster graphs. These graphs are obtained from the underlying communication network by contracting nodes and edges, and they appear frequently as components in the study of distributed algorithms. In particular, we give a $O(log^* n)$-round algorithm to $Delta+1$-color cluster graphs of at least polylogarithmic degree. The previous best bound known was $poly(log n)$ [Flin et.al, SODA'24]. This properly generalizes results in the COONGEST model and shows that distributed graph problems can be quickly solved even when the node itself is decentralized.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Distributed Delta-Coloring under Bandwidth Limitations
Yannic Maus, Magn'us M. Halld'orsson
We consider the problem of coloring graphs of maximum degree $Delta$ with $Delta$ colors in the distributed setting with limited bandwidth. Specifically, we give a $mathsf{poly}loglog n$-round randomized algorithm in the CONGEST model. This is close to the lower bound of $Omega(log log n)$ rounds from [Brandt et al., STOC '16], which holds also in the more powerful LOCAL model. The core of our algorithm is a reduction to several special instances of the constructive Lov'asz local lemma (LLL) and the $deg+1$-list coloring problem.
Read more5/17/2024
📊
0
Simpler and More General Distributed Coloring Based on Simple List Defective Coloring Algorithms
Marc Fuchs, Fabian Kuhn
In this paper, we give list coloring variants of simple iterative defective coloring algorithms. Formally, in a list defective coloring instance, each node $v$ of a graph is given a list $L_v$ of colors and a list of allowed defects $d_v(x)$ for the colors. Each node $v$ needs to be colored with a color $xin L_v$ such that at most $d_v(x)$ neighbors of $v$ also pick the same color $x$. For a defect parameter $d$, it is known that by making two sweeps in opposite order over the nodes of an edge-oriented graph with maximum outdegree $beta$, one can compute a coloring with $O(beta^2/d^2)$ colors such that every node has at most $d$ outneighbors of the same color. We generalize this and show that if all nodes have lists of size $p^2$ and $forall v:sum_{xin L_v}(d_v(x)+1)>pcdotbeta$, we can make two sweeps of the nodes such that at the end, each node $v$ has chosen a color $xin L_v$ for which at most $d_v(x)$ outneighbors of $v$ are colored with color $x$. Our algorithm is simpler and computationally significantly more efficient than existing algorithms for similar list defective coloring problems. We show that the above result can in particular be used to obtain an alternative $tilde{O}(sqrt{Delta})+O(log^* n)$-round algorithm for the $(Delta+1)$-coloring problem in the CONGEST model. The neighborhood independence $theta$ of a graph is the maximum number of pairwise non-adjacent neighbors of some node of the graph. It is known that by doing a single sweep over the nodes of a graph of neighborhood independence $theta$, one can compute a $d$-defective coloring with $O(thetacdot Delta/d)$ colors. We extend this approach to the list defective coloring setting and use it to obtain an efficient recursive coloring algorithm for graphs of neighborhood independence $theta$. In particular, if $theta=O(1)$, we get an $(logDelta)^{O(loglogDelta)}+O(log^* n)$-round algorithm.
Read more5/9/2024