AToM-Bot: Embodied Fulfillment of Unspoken Human Needs with Affective Theory of Mind

Read original: arXiv:2406.08455 - Published 6/18/2024 by Wei Ding, Fanhong Li, Ziteng Ji, Zhengrong Xue, Jia Liu
Total Score

0

AToM-Bot: Embodied Fulfillment of Unspoken Human Needs with Affective Theory of Mind

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces AToM-Bot, a novel embodied AI system designed to fulfill unspoken human needs by leveraging an "Affective Theory of Mind" (AToM) approach.
  • AToM-Bot aims to understand and respond to the emotional and social needs of humans through advanced perceptual and reasoning capabilities.
  • The system is intended to engage in natural interactions, anticipate human desires, and provide appropriate physical and emotional support.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new type of AI robot called AToM-Bot that is designed to better understand and meet the unspoken emotional and social needs of humans. Traditional AI systems often struggle to pick up on the subtle cues and unexpressed desires of the people they interact with. AToM-Bot, on the other hand, uses an "Affective Theory of Mind" approach, which gives it more advanced perception and reasoning abilities to recognize and respond to the feelings and social needs of humans.

The goal is for AToM-Bot to have natural, intuitive interactions where it can anticipate what a person wants or needs, even if they don't explicitly say it. For example, if someone seems stressed, AToM-Bot might offer a comforting gesture or suggest an activity to help them relax. The researchers believe this kind of socially and emotionally intelligent AI assistant could be very helpful in areas like elderly care, childcare, or therapeutic settings.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in AToM-Bot is its use of an "Affective Theory of Mind" (AToM) framework to model and reason about the mental states, emotions, and social needs of the humans it interacts with. Unlike traditional AI systems that rely on explicit instructions or predefined rules, AToM-Bot employs advanced perception, multimodal learning, and probabilistic inference techniques to dynamically infer the unspoken thoughts and feelings of its human partners.

The system's architecture integrates computer vision, natural language processing, emotion recognition, and social reasoning modules to build a comprehensive understanding of the human user. It can pick up on subtle behavioral cues, tone of voice, facial expressions, and contextual information to make informed guesses about the person's underlying psychological state and social needs.

Using this AToM-derived model of the human, AToM-Bot then selects appropriate physical and verbal responses to fulfill those unmet needs in an empathetic and socially appropriate manner. The researchers have designed the robot's embodiment and behavior to enhance this natural interaction, with smooth movements, gentle touches, and emotionally expressive displays.

Critical Analysis

The AToM-Bot concept represents an ambitious and thought-provoking step towards developing AI systems that can engage with humans in a more natural, emotionally intelligent way. By shifting the focus from task-completion to the implicit, unspoken needs of the user, the researchers are tackling an important challenge in human-AI interaction.

However, the paper does not fully address some of the significant technical and ethical hurdles involved in building such a system. For example, the reliability and accuracy of the AToM model in interpreting human mental states and social needs is a critical issue that requires rigorous testing and validation. There are also tricky questions around privacy, consent, and the potential for manipulation or over-dependence that must be carefully considered.

Additionally, the paper does not mention how AToM-Bot would handle situations where its interpretations of human needs are incorrect or where the human's desires conflict with the system's objectives. Further research is needed to explore the safety and robustness of these kinds of socially intelligent AI agents.

Conclusion

Overall, the AToM-Bot concept represents an innovative and ambitious step towards developing AI systems that can engage with humans in a more natural, emotionally intelligent manner. By focusing on the implicit, unspoken needs of the user rather than just task completion, the researchers are tackling an important challenge in human-AI interaction.

However, significant technical and ethical hurdles remain, and further research is needed to address issues around the reliability of the AToM model, privacy and consent, and the safety and robustness of these kinds of socially intelligent AI agents. As the field of human-AI interaction continues to evolve, the AToM-Bot approach offers an intriguing blueprint for creating AI systems that can truly understand and respond to the full breadth of human experiences and needs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

AToM-Bot: Embodied Fulfillment of Unspoken Human Needs with Affective Theory of Mind
Total Score

0

AToM-Bot: Embodied Fulfillment of Unspoken Human Needs with Affective Theory of Mind

Wei Ding, Fanhong Li, Ziteng Ji, Zhengrong Xue, Jia Liu

We propose AToM-Bot, a novel task generation and execution framework for proactive robot-human interaction, which leverages the human mental and physical state inference capabilities of the Vision Language Model (VLM) prompted by the Affective Theory of Mind (AToM). Without requiring explicit commands by humans, AToM-Bot proactively generates and follows feasible tasks to improve general human well-being. When around humans, AToM-Bot first detects current human needs based on inferred human states and observations of the surrounding environment. It then generates tasks to fulfill these needs, taking into account its embodied constraints. We designed 16 daily life scenarios spanning 4 common scenes and tasked the same visual stimulus to 59 human subjects and our robot. We used the similarity between human open-ended answers and robot output, and the human satisfaction scores to metric robot performance. AToM-Bot received high human evaluations in need detection (6.42/7, 91.7%), embodied solution (6.15/7, 87.8%) and task execution (6.17/7, 88.1%). We show that AToM-Bot excels in generating and executing feasible plans to fulfill unspoken human needs. Videos and code are available at https://affective-tom-bot.github.io.

Read more

6/18/2024

Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task
Total Score

0

New!Mutual Theory of Mind in Human-AI Collaboration: An Empirical Study with LLM-driven AI Agents in a Real-time Shared Workspace Task

Shao Zhang, Xihuai Wang, Wenhao Zhang, Yongshan Chen, Landi Gao, Dakuo Wang, Weinan Zhang, Xinbing Wang, Ying Wen

Theory of Mind (ToM) significantly impacts human collaboration and communication as a crucial capability to understand others. When AI agents with ToM capability collaborate with humans, Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) arises in such human-AI teams (HATs). The MToM process, which involves interactive communication and ToM-based strategy adjustment, affects the team's performance and collaboration process. To explore the MToM process, we conducted a mixed-design experiment using a large language model-driven AI agent with ToM and communication modules in a real-time shared-workspace task. We find that the agent's ToM capability does not significantly impact team performance but enhances human understanding of the agent and the feeling of being understood. Most participants in our study believe verbal communication increases human burden, and the results show that bidirectional communication leads to lower HAT performance. We discuss the results' implications for designing AI agents that collaborate with humans in real-time shared workspace tasks.

Read more

9/16/2024

❗

Total Score

0

Mutual Theory of Mind for Human-AI Communication

Qiaosi Wang (Georgia Institute of Technology), Ashok K. Goel (Georgia Institute of Technology)

New developments are enabling AI systems to perceive, recognize, and respond with social cues based on inferences made from humans' explicit or implicit behavioral and verbal cues. These AI systems, equipped with an equivalent of human's Theory of Mind (ToM) capability, are currently serving as matchmakers on dating platforms, assisting student learning as teaching assistants, and enhancing productivity as work partners. They mark a new era in human-AI interaction (HAI) that diverges from traditional human-computer interaction (HCI), where computers are commonly seen as tools instead of social actors. Designing and understanding the human perceptions and experiences in this emerging HAI era becomes an urgent and critical issue for AI systems to fulfill human needs and mitigate risks across social contexts. In this paper, we posit the Mutual Theory of Mind (MToM) framework, inspired by our capability of ToM in human-human communications, to guide this new generation of HAI research by highlighting the iterative and mutual shaping nature of human-AI communication. We discuss the motivation of the MToM framework and its three key components that iteratively shape the human-AI communication in three stages. We then describe two empirical studies inspired by the MToM framework to demonstrate the power of MToM in guiding the design and understanding of human-AI communication. Finally, we discuss future research opportunities in human-AI interaction through the lens of MToM.

Read more

5/28/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Expedient Assistance and Consequential Misunderstanding: Envisioning an Operationalized Mutual Theory of Mind

Justin D. Weisz, Michael Muller, Arielle Goldberg, Dario Andres Silva Moran

Design fictions allow us to prototype the future. They enable us to interrogate emerging or non-existent technologies and examine their implications. We present three design fictions that probe the potential consequences of operationalizing a mutual theory of mind (MToM) between human users and one (or more) AI agents. We use these fictions to explore many aspects of MToM, including how models of the other party are shaped through interaction, how discrepancies between these models lead to breakdowns, and how models of a human's knowledge and skills enable AI agents to act in their stead. We examine these aspects through two lenses: a utopian lens in which MToM enhances human-human interactions and leads to synergistic human-AI collaborations, and a dystopian lens in which a faulty or misaligned MToM leads to problematic outcomes. Our work provides an aspirational vision for human-centered MToM research while simultaneously warning of the consequences when implemented incorrectly.

Read more

6/19/2024