Augmented Bayesian Policy Search

Read original: arXiv:2407.04864 - Published 7/9/2024 by Mahdi Kallel, Debabrota Basu, Riad Akrour, Carlo D'Eramo
Total Score

0

Augmented Bayesian Policy Search

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents an "Augmented Bayesian Policy Search" (ABPS) algorithm for reinforcement learning
  • Aims to improve exploration and sample efficiency compared to standard Bayesian optimization approaches
  • Incorporates additional information about the value function and dynamics into the Bayesian optimization process

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new reinforcement learning algorithm called "Augmented Bayesian Policy Search" (ABPS). The key idea behind ABPS is to incorporate additional information about the problem, beyond just the rewards or returns, to guide the exploration and learning process more effectively.

In a standard reinforcement learning setup, an agent interacts with an environment and tries to learn a policy (a way of making decisions) that will maximize the rewards it receives over time. Bayesian optimization is a popular approach for this, where the agent builds a probabilistic model of the reward function and uses that to guide its exploration of the policy space.

ABPS builds on this by also modeling the dynamics of the environment (how the state changes in response to the agent's actions) and the value function (how good each state is in terms of future rewards). By incorporating this additional information, ABPS is able to explore the policy space more efficiently and find good policies with fewer interactions with the environment.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of ABPS through experiments on several benchmark reinforcement learning problems, showing that it can outperform standard Bayesian optimization approaches in terms of sample efficiency and final performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper formalizes the reinforcement learning problem as a Markov decision process (MDP), where an agent interacts with an environment and tries to learn an optimal policy to maximize the expected cumulative reward.

The core of the ABPS algorithm is to maintain Bayesian models of the reward function, the value function, and the transition dynamics of the environment. These models are updated iteratively as the agent collects more experience from interacting with the environment.

The algorithm then uses these models to guide the exploration of the policy space, balancing exploitation of the current best policy with exploration of potentially better policies. This is done by defining an acquisition function that combines information about the expected reward, the uncertainty in the reward prediction, and the predicted impact on the value function and dynamics.

The paper presents theoretical analysis showing that ABPS can achieve better sample complexity than standard Bayesian optimization approaches, under certain assumptions. The experimental results on benchmark tasks like continuous control and maze navigation demonstrate the practical advantages of ABPS in terms of faster convergence and higher final performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several important contributions to the field of reinforcement learning, particularly in the context of using Bayesian optimization techniques. The key insight of incorporating additional information about the value function and dynamics is well-motivated and the theoretical analysis provides useful guarantees.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for future work. For example, the theoretical analysis relies on strong assumptions about the structure of the MDP and the models used, which may not always hold in practice. Additionally, the experiments are focused on relatively simple benchmark problems, and it's not clear how well ABPS would scale to more complex, real-world scenarios.

Another potential concern is the computational complexity of maintaining and updating the various Bayesian models used in ABPS. This could limit its applicability in settings where real-time decision-making is required or where computational resources are constrained.

Overall, the paper presents a promising and well-executed approach to improving the sample efficiency and performance of reinforcement learning agents. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and explore the broader applicability of the ABPS algorithm, particularly in more challenging and realistic problem domains.

Conclusion

The "Augmented Bayesian Policy Search" (ABPS) algorithm introduced in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of reinforcement learning. By incorporating additional information about the value function and environment dynamics into the Bayesian optimization process, ABPS is able to guide the exploration of the policy space more effectively, leading to faster convergence and higher performance compared to standard approaches.

The theoretical analysis and experimental results provided in the paper suggest that ABPS could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on a wide range of reinforcement learning problems, from robotics and control to game AI and decision-making systems. As the field of reinforcement learning continues to evolve, techniques like ABPS that can enhance sample efficiency and exploration will become increasingly important, especially as these algorithms are deployed in real-world applications with limited data and computational resources.

While the paper highlights some potential limitations and areas for future work, the core ideas behind ABPS represent a significant step forward in the quest to build more capable and sample-efficient reinforcement learning agents. As the field progresses, we can expect to see further advancements and refinements of this approach, ultimately leading to more powerful and versatile AI systems that can tackle increasingly complex challenges.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Augmented Bayesian Policy Search
Total Score

0

Augmented Bayesian Policy Search

Mahdi Kallel, Debabrota Basu, Riad Akrour, Carlo D'Eramo

Deterministic policies are often preferred over stochastic ones when implemented on physical systems. They can prevent erratic and harmful behaviors while being easier to implement and interpret. However, in practice, exploration is largely performed by stochastic policies. First-order Bayesian Optimization (BO) methods offer a principled way of performing exploration using deterministic policies. This is done through a learned probabilistic model of the objective function and its gradient. Nonetheless, such approaches treat policy search as a black-box problem, and thus, neglect the reinforcement learning nature of the problem. In this work, we leverage the performance difference lemma to introduce a novel mean function for the probabilistic model. This results in augmenting BO methods with the action-value function. Hence, we call our method Augmented Bayesian Search~(ABS). Interestingly, this new mean function enhances the posterior gradient with the deterministic policy gradient, effectively bridging the gap between BO and policy gradient methods. The resulting algorithm combines the convenience of the direct policy search with the scalability of reinforcement learning. We validate ABS on high-dimensional locomotion problems and demonstrate competitive performance compared to existing direct policy search schemes.

Read more

7/9/2024

Differentiating Policies for Non-Myopic Bayesian Optimization
Total Score

0

Differentiating Policies for Non-Myopic Bayesian Optimization

Darian Nwankwo, David Bindel

Bayesian optimization (BO) methods choose sample points by optimizing an acquisition function derived from a statistical model of the objective. These acquisition functions are chosen to balance sampling regions with predicted good objective values against exploring regions where the objective is uncertain. Standard acquisition functions are myopic, considering only the impact of the next sample, but non-myopic acquisition functions may be more effective. In principle, one could model the sampling by a Markov decision process, and optimally choose the next sample by maximizing an expected reward computed by dynamic programming; however, this is infeasibly expensive. More practical approaches, such as rollout, consider a parametric family of sampling policies. In this paper, we show how to efficiently estimate rollout acquisition functions and their gradients, enabling stochastic gradient-based optimization of sampling policies.

Read more

8/16/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

Read more

6/21/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Transition Constrained Bayesian Optimization via Markov Decision Processes

Jose Pablo Folch, Calvin Tsay, Robert M Lee, Behrang Shafei, Weronika Ormaniec, Andreas Krause, Mark van der Wilk, Ruth Misener, Mojm'ir Mutn'y

Bayesian optimization is a methodology to optimize black-box functions. Traditionally, it focuses on the setting where you can arbitrarily query the search space. However, many real-life problems do not offer this flexibility; in particular, the search space of the next query may depend on previous ones. Example challenges arise in the physical sciences in the form of local movement constraints, required monotonicity in certain variables, and transitions influencing the accuracy of measurements. Altogether, such transition constraints necessitate a form of planning. This work extends classical Bayesian optimization via the framework of Markov Decision Processes. We iteratively solve a tractable linearization of our utility function using reinforcement learning to obtain a policy that plans ahead for the entire horizon. This is a parallel to the optimization of an acquisition function in policy space. The resulting policy is potentially history-dependent and non-Markovian. We showcase applications in chemical reactor optimization, informative path planning, machine calibration, and other synthetic examples.

Read more

5/30/2024