Automated System-level Testing of Unmanned Aerial Systems
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a framework for automated system-level testing of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS).
- It aims to address the challenge of testing complex UAS with numerous components and interactions.
- The framework combines simulation, hardware-in-the-loop, and real-world testing to provide a comprehensive testing approach.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new way to test Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). UAS are aircraft that fly without a human pilot on board. They have many different parts and systems that need to work together properly.
The researchers developed a testing framework that uses a combination of computer simulation, hardware-in-the-loop testing, and real-world testing. This allows them to thoroughly check that all the parts of the UAS work as expected, before the system is deployed in the real world.
The goal is to make it easier and more reliable to test complex UAS systems, which have many interdependent components. This is important for ensuring the safety and reliability of UAS technology, which is becoming more widely used for tasks like search and rescue or transportation.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an automated system-level testing framework for UAS. It combines simulation, hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing, and real-world testing to provide a comprehensive approach.
The simulation component allows testing of the UAS in a virtual environment, without the risk of physical damage. This enables rapid prototyping and evaluation of different designs and configurations.
The HIL testing integrates physical hardware components, such as sensors and actuators, with the simulation environment. This allows testing of the interactions between the hardware and software under realistic conditions.
Finally, the real-world testing stage validates the UAS performance in the actual operating environment. This step is crucial for ensuring the system meets all requirements and regulations.
The framework also includes automated test case generation and test execution, which improves the efficiency and consistency of the testing process. Additionally, the researchers developed a simulation-based fault injection technique to assess the UAS's resilience to failures.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their framework through a case study involving a multi-rotor UAS. The results show the framework can identify issues early in the development process and improve the overall reliability of the UAS.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed testing framework for UAS, addressing an important challenge in the field. The combination of simulation, HIL, and real-world testing is a thoughtful approach that can provide a thorough evaluation of UAS systems.
One potential limitation is the reliance on simulation, which may not fully capture all the complexities and uncertainties of the real-world environment. While the authors mention the inclusion of real-world testing, more details on the extent and integration of these tests would be helpful.
Additionally, the fault injection technique is an interesting approach, but the paper could explore the broader implications of resilience testing and how it can inform system design and risk mitigation strategies.
Finally, the scalability and adaptability of the framework to different UAS platforms and applications could be an area for further investigation, as the complexity of UAS systems can vary significantly.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel automated system-level testing framework for Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) that combines simulation, hardware-in-the-loop testing, and real-world validation. The framework addresses the challenge of thoroughly testing complex UAS systems with numerous interdependent components.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through a case study, showing its ability to identify issues early in the development process and improve the overall reliability of the UAS. This framework has the potential to contribute to the safe and reliable deployment of UAS technology, which is becoming increasingly important for a wide range of applications, from search and rescue to transportation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Automated System-level Testing of Unmanned Aerial Systems
Hassan Sartaj, Asmar Muqeet, Muhammad Zohaib Iqbal, Muhammad Uzair Khan
Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) rely on various avionics systems that are safety-critical and mission-critical. A major requirement of international safety standards is to perform rigorous system-level testing of avionics software systems. The current industrial practice is to manually create test scenarios, manually/automatically execute these scenarios using simulators, and manually evaluate outcomes. The test scenarios typically consist of setting certain flight or environment conditions and testing the system under test in these settings. The state-of-the-art approaches for this purpose also require manual test scenario development and evaluation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to automate the system-level testing of the UAS. The proposed approach (AITester) utilizes model-based testing and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automatically generate, execute, and evaluate various test scenarios. The test scenarios are generated on the fly, i.e., during test execution based on the environmental context at runtime. The approach is supported by a toolset. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach on two core components of UAS, an autopilot system of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and cockpit display systems (CDS) of the ground control station (GCS). The results show that the AITester effectively generates test scenarios causing deviations from the expected behavior of the UAV autopilot and reveals potential flaws in the GCS-CDS.
Read more8/6/2024
0
Simulation-based Scenario Generation for Robust Hybrid AI for Autonomy
Hambisa Keno, Nicholas J. Pioch, Christopher Guagliano, Timothy H. Chung
Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in search and rescue, emergency management, and law enforcement has gained traction with the advent of low-cost platforms and sensor payloads. The emergence of hybrid neural and symbolic AI approaches for complex reasoning is expected to further push the boundaries of these applications with decreasing levels of human intervention. However, current UAV simulation environments lack semantic context suited to this hybrid approach. To address this gap, HAMERITT (Hybrid Ai Mission Environment for RapId Training and Testing) provides a simulation-based autonomy software framework that supports the training, testing and assurance of neuro-symbolic algorithms for autonomous maneuver and perception reasoning. HAMERITT includes scenario generation capabilities that offer mission-relevant contextual symbolic information in addition to raw sensor data. Scenarios include symbolic descriptions for entities of interest and their relations to scene elements, as well as spatial-temporal constraints in the form of time-bounded areas of interest with prior probabilities and restricted zones within those areas. HAMERITT also features support for training distinct algorithm threads for maneuver vs. perception within an end-to-end mission run. Future work includes improving scenario realism and scaling symbolic context generation through automated workflow.
Read more9/11/2024
🎲
0
Survey of Simulators for Aerial Robots
Cora A. Dimmig, Giuseppe Silano, Kimberly McGuire, Chiara Gabellieri, Wolfgang Honig, Joseph Moore, Marin Kobilarov
Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) research faces challenges with safety, scalability, costs, and ecological impact when conducting hardware testing. High-fidelity simulators offer a vital solution by replicating real-world conditions to enable the development and evaluation of novel perception and control algorithms. However, the large number of available simulators poses a significant challenge for researchers to determine which simulator best suits their specific use-case, based on each simulator's limitations and customization readiness. In this paper we present an overview of 44 UAV simulators, including in-depth, systematic comparisons for 14 of the simulators. Additionally, we present a set of decision factors for selection of simulators, aiming to enhance the efficiency and safety of research endeavors.
Read more8/2/2024
0
A System for Automated Unit Test Generation Using Large Language Models and Assessment of Generated Test Suites
Andrea Lops, Fedelucio Narducci, Azzurra Ragone, Michelantonio Trizio, Claudio Bartolini
Unit tests represent the most basic level of testing within the software testing lifecycle and are crucial to ensuring software correctness. Designing and creating unit tests is a costly and labor-intensive process that is ripe for automation. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have been applied to various aspects of software development, including unit test generation. Although several empirical studies evaluating LLMs' capabilities in test code generation exist, they primarily focus on simple scenarios, such as the straightforward generation of unit tests for individual methods. These evaluations often involve independent and small-scale test units, providing a limited view of LLMs' performance in real-world software development scenarios. Moreover, previous studies do not approach the problem at a suitable scale for real-life applications. Generated unit tests are often evaluated via manual integration into the original projects, a process that limits the number of tests executed and reduces overall efficiency. To address these gaps, we have developed an approach for generating and evaluating more real-life complexity test suites. Our approach focuses on class-level test code generation and automates the entire process from test generation to test assessment. In this work, we present AgoneTest: an automated system for generating test suites for Java projects and a comprehensive and principled methodology for evaluating the generated test suites. Starting from a state-of-the-art dataset (i.e., Methods2Test), we built a new dataset for comparing human-written tests with those generated by LLMs. Our key contributions include a scalable automated software system, a new dataset, and a detailed methodology for evaluating test quality.
Read more8/19/2024