Automatic segmentation of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck cancer patients from CT and MRI scans

Read original: arXiv:2405.10833 - Published 5/27/2024 by S'ebastien Quetin, Andrew Heschl, Mauricio Murillo, Rohit Murali, Shirin A. Enger, Farhad Maleki
Total Score

0

Automatic segmentation of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck cancer patients from CT and MRI scans

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for automatically segmenting organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck cancer patients from CT and MRI scans.
  • The proposed approach leverages deep learning techniques to accurately identify and delineate critical structures, such as the parotid glands, spinal cord, and brainstem, which are essential for radiation therapy planning.
  • The method is evaluated on a diverse dataset of head and neck cancer patients, demonstrating strong performance compared to manual segmentation by expert clinicians.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new computer system that can automatically identify and outline important organs in the head and neck area of cancer patients from their medical scans. These organs, called "organs at risk," are critical structures that need to be carefully protected during radiation therapy.

The system uses advanced artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically deep learning models, to analyze CT and MRI scans of the patients' heads and necks. It is able to accurately detect and segment key structures like the parotid glands, spinal cord, and brainstem. This is an important capability, as manually delineating these organs is a time-consuming and difficult task for doctors.

By automating this segmentation process, the system has the potential to streamline radiation treatment planning and improve patient outcomes. The researchers tested their method on a diverse dataset of head and neck cancer patients and found that it performed well compared to manual segmentation by expert clinicians.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a deep learning-based approach for automatic segmentation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients from CT and MRI scans. The proposed method leverages convolutional neural networks to accurately identify and delineate critical structures, such as the parotid glands, spinal cord, and brainstem, which are essential for radiation therapy planning.

The authors evaluated their method on a dataset comprising CT and MRI scans from a cohort of head and neck cancer patients. They compared the automated segmentations to ground truth annotations provided by expert clinicians, demonstrating strong performance in terms of standard segmentation metrics like Dice score.

The results suggest that this deep learning-based approach can effectively automate the process of organ segmentation, which is typically a labor-intensive and subjective task when performed manually. This could have important implications for streamlining radiation treatment planning workflows and improving the consistency and reproducibility of OAR delineation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for automating the segmentation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients, an important step in the radiation therapy planning process. The authors have carefully designed and evaluated their deep learning-based method, demonstrating its ability to match or exceed the performance of expert clinicians.

However, the paper does not fully address certain limitations and potential areas for further research. For example, the dataset used for evaluation, while diverse, may not be representative of the broader population of head and neck cancer patients. Additional validation on larger, more heterogeneous datasets would be valuable to assess the generalizability of the method.

Moreover, the paper does not explore the potential impact of factors like image quality, resolution, or acquisition protocols on the system's performance. Understanding the robustness of the approach to variations in imaging data would be an important next step in evaluating its real-world applicability.

Additionally, while the authors mention the potential for streamlining radiation therapy planning, they do not provide a detailed analysis of the clinical workflow implications or the anticipated time and cost savings. Further research in this direction could help quantify the practical benefits of the proposed automated segmentation system.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising deep learning-based approach for automating the segmentation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients. By accurately and consistently identifying critical structures like the parotid glands, spinal cord, and brainstem, the method has the potential to streamline radiation therapy planning and improve patient outcomes.

The strong performance of the system, as demonstrated on a diverse dataset of head and neck cancer patients, suggests that this technology could be a valuable tool for clinicians. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and fully explore the real-world implications of this automated segmentation approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Automatic segmentation of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck cancer patients from CT and MRI scans
Total Score

0

Automatic segmentation of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck cancer patients from CT and MRI scans

S'ebastien Quetin, Andrew Heschl, Mauricio Murillo, Rohit Murali, Shirin A. Enger, Farhad Maleki

Background and purpose: Deep Learning (DL) has been widely explored for Organs at Risk (OARs) segmentation; however, most studies have focused on a single modality, either CT or MRI, not both simultaneously. This study presents a high-performing DL pipeline for segmentation of 30 OARs from MRI and CT scans of Head and Neck (H&N) cancer patients. Materials and methods: Paired CT and MRI-T1 images from 42 H&N cancer patients alongside annotation for 30 OARs from the H&N OAR CT & MR segmentation challenge dataset were used to develop a segmentation pipeline. After cropping irrelevant regions, rigid followed by non-rigid registration of CT and MRI volumes was performed. Two versions of the CT volume, representing soft tissues and bone anatomy, were stacked with the MRI volume and used as input to an nnU-Net pipeline. Modality Dropout was used during the training to force the model to learn from the different modalities. Segmentation masks were predicted with the trained model for an independent set of 14 new patients. The mean Dice Score (DS) and Hausdorff Distance (HD) were calculated for each OAR across these patients to evaluate the pipeline. Results: This resulted in an overall mean DS and HD of 0.777 +- 0.118 and 3.455 +- 1.679, respectively, establishing the state-of-the-art (SOTA) for this challenge at the time of submission. Conclusion: The proposed pipeline achieved the best DS and HD among all participants of the H&N OAR CT and MR segmentation challenge and sets a new SOTA for automated segmentation of H&N OARs.

Read more

5/27/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Quality assurance of organs-at-risk delineation in radiotherapy

Yihao Zhao, Cuiyun Yuan, Ying Liang, Yang Li, Chunxia Li, Man Zhao, Jun Hu, Wei Liu, Chenbin Liu

The delineation of tumor target and organs-at-risk is critical in the radiotherapy treatment planning. Automatic segmentation can be used to reduce the physician workload and improve the consistency. However, the quality assurance of the automatic segmentation is still an unmet need in clinical practice. The patient data used in our study was a standardized dataset from AAPM Thoracic Auto-Segmentation Challenge. The OARs included were left and right lungs, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord. Two groups of OARs were generated, the benchmark dataset manually contoured by experienced physicians and the test dataset automatically created using a software AccuContour. A resnet-152 network was performed as feature extractor, and one-class support vector classifier was used to determine the high or low quality. We evaluate the model performance with balanced accuracy, F-score, sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve. We randomly generated contour errors to assess the generalization of our method, explored the detection limit, and evaluated the correlations between detection limit and various metrics such as volume, Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance. The proposed one-class classifier outperformed in metrics such as balanced accuracy, AUC, and others. The proposed method showed significant improvement over binary classifiers in handling various types of errors. Our proposed model, which introduces residual network and attention mechanism in the one-class classification framework, was able to detect the various types of OAR contour errors with high accuracy. The proposed method can significantly reduce the burden of physician review for contour delineation.

Read more

5/21/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

MRSegmentator: Robust Multi-Modality Segmentation of 40 Classes in MRI and CT Sequences

Hartmut Hantze, Lina Xu, Felix J. Dorfner, Leonhard Donle, Daniel Truhn, Hugo Aerts, Mathias Prokop, Bram van Ginneken, Alessa Hering, Lisa C. Adams, Keno K. Bressem

Purpose: To introduce a deep learning model capable of multi-organ segmentation in MRI scans, offering a solution to the current limitations in MRI analysis due to challenges in resolution, standardized intensity values, and variability in sequences. Materials and Methods: he model was trained on 1,200 manually annotated MRI scans from the UK Biobank, 221 in-house MRI scans and 1228 CT scans, leveraging cross-modality transfer learning from CT segmentation models. A human-in-the-loop annotation workflow was employed to efficiently create high-quality segmentations. The model's performance was evaluated on NAKO and the AMOS22 dataset containing 600 and 60 MRI examinations. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD) was used to assess segmentation accuracy. The model will be open sourced. Results: The model showcased high accuracy in segmenting well-defined organs, achieving Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) scores of 0.97 for the right and left lungs, and 0.95 for the heart. It also demonstrated robustness in organs like the liver (DSC: 0.96) and kidneys (DSC: 0.95 left, 0.95 right), which present more variability. However, segmentation of smaller and complex structures such as the portal and splenic veins (DSC: 0.54) and adrenal glands (DSC: 0.65 left, 0.61 right) revealed the need for further model optimization. Conclusion: The proposed model is a robust, tool for accurate segmentation of 40 anatomical structures in MRI and CT images. By leveraging cross-modality learning and interactive annotation, the model achieves strong performance and generalizability across diverse datasets, making it a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians. It is open source and can be downloaded from https://github.com/hhaentze/MRSegmentator.

Read more

5/14/2024

Rethinking Abdominal Organ Segmentation (RAOS) in the clinical scenario: A robustness evaluation benchmark with challenging cases
Total Score

0

Rethinking Abdominal Organ Segmentation (RAOS) in the clinical scenario: A robustness evaluation benchmark with challenging cases

Xiangde Luo, Zihan Li, Shaoting Zhang, Wenjun Liao, Guotai Wang

Deep learning has enabled great strides in abdominal multi-organ segmentation, even surpassing junior oncologists on common cases or organs. However, robustness on corner cases and complex organs remains a challenging open problem for clinical adoption. To investigate model robustness, we collected and annotated the RAOS dataset comprising 413 CT scans ($sim$80k 2D images, $sim$8k 3D organ annotations) from 413 patients each with 17 (female) or 19 (male) labelled organs, manually delineated by oncologists. We grouped scans based on clinical information into 1) diagnosis/radiotherapy (317 volumes), 2) partial excision without the whole organ missing (22 volumes), and 3) excision with the whole organ missing (74 volumes). RAOS provides a potential benchmark for evaluating model robustness including organ hallucination. It also includes some organs that can be very hard to access on public datasets like the rectum, colon, intestine, prostate and seminal vesicles. We benchmarked several state-of-the-art methods in these three clinical groups to evaluate performance and robustness. We also assessed cross-generalization between RAOS and three public datasets. This dataset and comprehensive analysis establish a potential baseline for future robustness research: url{https://github.com/Luoxd1996/RAOS}.

Read more

6/21/2024