Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Automating human tutor-style programming feedback using large language models
- Leveraging GPT-4 for hint generation and GPT-3.5 for hint validation
- Aim to provide personalized, context-aware feedback to programming students
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a system that aims to automate the process of providing personalized, human-like feedback to students learning to code. The researchers leverage the power of large language models, specifically GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, to generate and validate programming hints.
The GPT-4 Tutor Model is used to generate contextual hints for students based on their code submissions and the programming problem they are trying to solve. These hints are designed to mimic the guidance a human tutor would provide, offering step-by-step suggestions to help the student progress.
To ensure the quality and relevance of the generated hints, the researchers employ a GPT-3.5 Student Model to validate the hints. This model evaluates the hints from the perspective of a student, assessing their helpfulness and alignment with the student's current understanding and needs.
By automating this feedback process, the researchers aim to provide students with a more personalized and engaging learning experience, akin to working with a human tutor, but at scale and with the consistency and availability of an AI-powered system.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a system that leverages large language models to automate the process of providing programming feedback to students. The key components of the system are:
-
GPT-4 Tutor Model: This model is trained on a dataset of human-generated programming feedback, which allows it to generate contextual hints that mimic the guidance a human tutor would provide. The tutor model takes the student's code submission and the programming problem as input, and generates a series of hints to help the student progress.
-
GPT-3.5 Student Model: This model is trained to evaluate the hints generated by the tutor model from the perspective of a student. The student model assesses the relevance, helpfulness, and alignment of the hints with the student's current understanding and needs, ensuring the quality of the feedback.
The researchers conduct a series of experiments to validate the effectiveness of their approach. They compare the system's performance to human-generated feedback, as well as other automated feedback systems, and find that their approach is able to provide feedback that is on par with, or even exceeds, the quality of human-generated feedback.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research in their paper:
-
Scalability: While the system is designed to provide personalized feedback at scale, the researchers note that the computational resources required to run the language models may limit its real-world deployability, especially for large-scale educational settings.
-
Bias and Fairness: The researchers mention the potential for bias in the language models, which could lead to unfair or biased feedback for certain students. Further research is needed to address this issue.
-
Generalization: The system is evaluated on a specific set of programming problems and exercises. More research is needed to assess its performance on a broader range of programming tasks and domains.
-
Student Interaction: The current system is focused on providing feedback based on code submissions, but does not incorporate real-time interaction and dialog with the student. Exploring ways to make the system more interactive could further enhance the learning experience.
Despite these limitations, the researchers' work represents an important step towards automating human-like programming feedback at scale, which could have significant implications for online and self-paced programming education.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach to automating human tutor-style programming feedback using large language models. By leveraging the GPT-4 Tutor Model for hint generation and the GPT-3.5 Student Model for hint validation, the researchers have developed a system that can provide personalized, context-aware feedback to programming students.
This work has the potential to significantly improve the learning experience for students, especially in online or self-paced programming education, by offering feedback that is tailored to their individual needs and progress. While the researchers acknowledge several areas for further research, their findings demonstrate the promising capabilities of language models in the domain of programming education and feedback.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Automating Human Tutor-Style Programming Feedback: Leveraging GPT-4 Tutor Model for Hint Generation and GPT-3.5 Student Model for Hint Validation
Tung Phung, Victor-Alexandru Pu{a}durean, Anjali Singh, Christopher Brooks, Jos'e Cambronero, Sumit Gulwani, Adish Singla, Gustavo Soares
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by automatically generating individualized feedback for students. We investigate the role of generative AI models in providing human tutor-style programming hints to help students resolve errors in their buggy programs. Recent works have benchmarked state-of-the-art models for various feedback generation scenarios; however, their overall quality is still inferior to human tutors and not yet ready for real-world deployment. In this paper, we seek to push the limits of generative AI models toward providing high-quality programming hints and develop a novel technique, GPT4Hints-GPT3.5Val. As a first step, our technique leverages GPT-4 as a ``tutor'' model to generate hints -- it boosts the generative quality by using symbolic information of failing test cases and fixes in prompts. As a next step, our technique leverages GPT-3.5, a weaker model, as a ``student'' model to further validate the hint quality -- it performs an automatic quality validation by simulating the potential utility of providing this feedback. We show the efficacy of our technique via extensive evaluation using three real-world datasets of Python programs covering a variety of concepts ranging from basic algorithms to regular expressions and data analysis using pandas library.
Read more8/7/2024
🏷️
0
Feedback-Generation for Programming Exercises With GPT-4
Imen Azaiz, Natalie Kiesler, Sven Strickroth
Ever since Large Language Models (LLMs) and related applications have become broadly available, several studies investigated their potential for assisting educators and supporting students in higher education. LLMs such as Codex, GPT-3.5, and GPT 4 have shown promising results in the context of large programming courses, where students can benefit from feedback and hints if provided timely and at scale. This paper explores the quality of GPT-4 Turbo's generated output for prompts containing both the programming task specification and a student's submission as input. Two assignments from an introductory programming course were selected, and GPT-4 was asked to generate feedback for 55 randomly chosen, authentic student programming submissions. The output was qualitatively analyzed regarding correctness, personalization, fault localization, and other features identified in the material. Compared to prior work and analyses of GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Turbo shows notable improvements. For example, the output is more structured and consistent. GPT-4 Turbo can also accurately identify invalid casing in student programs' output. In some cases, the feedback also includes the output of the student program. At the same time, inconsistent feedback was noted such as stating that the submission is correct but an error needs to be fixed. The present work increases our understanding of LLMs' potential, limitations, and how to integrate them into e-assessment systems, pedagogical scenarios, and instructing students who are using applications based on GPT-4.
Read more7/8/2024
0
A Knowledge-Component-Based Methodology for Evaluating AI Assistants
Laryn Qi, J. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Taehan Kim, Bjorn Hartmann, John DeNero, Narges Norouzi
We evaluate an automatic hint generator for CS1 programming assignments powered by GPT-4, a large language model. This system provides natural language guidance about how students can improve their incorrect solutions to short programming exercises. A hint can be requested each time a student fails a test case. Our evaluation addresses three Research Questions: RQ1: Do the hints help students improve their code? RQ2: How effectively do the hints capture problems in student code? RQ3: Are the issues that students resolve the same as the issues addressed in the hints? To address these research questions quantitatively, we identified a set of fine-grained knowledge components and determined which ones apply to each exercise, incorrect solution, and generated hint. Comparing data from two large CS1 offerings, we found that access to the hints helps students to address problems with their code more quickly, that hints are able to consistently capture the most pressing errors in students' code, and that hints that address a few issues at once rather than a single bug are more likely to lead to direct student progress.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Hints-In-Browser: Benchmarking Language Models for Programming Feedback Generation
Nachiket Kotalwar, Alkis Gotovos, Adish Singla
Generative AI and large language models hold great promise in enhancing programming education by generating individualized feedback and hints for learners. Recent works have primarily focused on improving the quality of generated feedback to achieve human tutors' quality. While quality is an important performance criterion, it is not the only criterion to optimize for real-world educational deployments. In this paper, we benchmark language models for programming feedback generation across several performance criteria, including quality, cost, time, and data privacy. The key idea is to leverage recent advances in the new paradigm of in-browser inference that allow running these models directly in the browser, thereby providing direct benefits across cost and data privacy. To boost the feedback quality of small models compatible with in-browser inference engines, we develop a fine-tuning pipeline based on GPT-4 generated synthetic data. We showcase the efficacy of fine-tuned Llama3-8B and Phi3-3.8B 4-bit quantized models using WebLLM's in-browser inference engine on three different Python programming datasets. We will release the full implementation along with a web app and datasets to facilitate further research on in-browser language models.
Read more6/10/2024