Back to the Continuous Attractor

Read original: arXiv:2408.00109 - Published 8/2/2024 by 'Abel S'agodi, Guillermo Mart'in-S'anchez, Piotr Sok'ol, Il Memming Park
Total Score

0

Back to the Continuous Attractor

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a critique of the concept of "continuous attractors" in neural network models.
  • It argues that the continuous attractor framework has limitations and should be revisited.
  • The paper proposes an alternative approach called "Back to the Continuous Attractor" that aims to address these limitations.

Plain English Explanation

The paper challenges the idea of "continuous attractors" in neural network models. Continuous attractors are mathematical models that describe how neural networks can maintain stable representations or "attractors" over time, even as the input changes.

The authors argue that while continuous attractors are a useful theoretical concept, they have some significant limitations in real-world neural network applications. For example, continuous attractors may not be able to accurately capture the complex dynamics of neural networks, and they may not be able to explain certain neural phenomena like memory formation and recall.

To address these issues, the paper proposes an alternative approach called "Back to the Continuous Attractor." This approach aims to build on the strengths of the continuous attractor framework while addressing its limitations. The key idea is to develop new mathematical models and analysis techniques that can better capture the true dynamics of neural networks and their ability to store and retrieve information over time.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by providing a detailed critique of the continuous attractor framework. It argues that this framework makes several simplifying assumptions that may not hold true in real neural networks, such as the assumption of linear dynamics and the lack of consideration for the network's internal state.

The paper then outlines the "Back to the Continuous Attractor" approach, which involves developing new mathematical models and analysis techniques to study the dynamics of neural networks. This includes exploring the role of nonlinear dynamics, recurrent connections, and the interplay between the network's internal state and its input-output behavior.

The authors present several theoretical insights and case studies to support their proposed approach. For example, they show how certain types of recurrent neural networks can exhibit complex attractor dynamics that cannot be captured by the traditional continuous attractor framework.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises some valid concerns about the limitations of the continuous attractor framework and the need for more sophisticated models to understand the dynamics of neural networks. The authors' proposal to "go back to the continuous attractor" and develop new mathematical tools to study these systems is a reasonable and potentially fruitful direction for future research.

However, the paper also acknowledges that the continuous attractor framework has been widely used and has provided valuable insights in the field of neural network modeling. The authors' critique could be seen as somewhat one-sided, and it may be necessary to carefully evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of both the continuous attractor and the proposed "Back to the Continuous Attractor" approaches.

Additionally, the implementation and empirical validation of the new mathematical models and analysis techniques proposed in the paper are not yet fully demonstrated. Further research and experimentation will be needed to assess the practical utility and scalability of the authors' approach.

Conclusion

This paper provides a thoughtful critique of the continuous attractor framework and proposes an alternative approach called "Back to the Continuous Attractor" to address its limitations. The authors' focus on developing more sophisticated mathematical models and analysis techniques to study the dynamics of neural networks is a valuable contribution to the field.

While the continuous attractor framework has been widely used and has provided valuable insights, the paper highlights the need for more nuanced and flexible models to capture the complex behavior of real-world neural networks. The "Back to the Continuous Attractor" approach offers a promising direction for future research, with the potential to lead to new insights and advancements in the understanding of neural network dynamics and their applications in various domains.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Back to the Continuous Attractor
Total Score

0

Back to the Continuous Attractor

'Abel S'agodi, Guillermo Mart'in-S'anchez, Piotr Sok'ol, Il Memming Park

Continuous attractors offer a unique class of solutions for storing continuous-valued variables in recurrent system states for indefinitely long time intervals. Unfortunately, continuous attractors suffer from severe structural instability in general--they are destroyed by most infinitesimal changes of the dynamical law that defines them. This fragility limits their utility especially in biological systems as their recurrent dynamics are subject to constant perturbations. We observe that the bifurcations from continuous attractors in theoretical neuroscience models display various structurally stable forms. Although their asymptotic behaviors to maintain memory are categorically distinct, their finite-time behaviors are similar. We build on the persistent manifold theory to explain the commonalities between bifurcations from and approximations of continuous attractors. Fast-slow decomposition analysis uncovers the persistent manifold that survives the seemingly destructive bifurcation. Moreover, recurrent neural networks trained on analog memory tasks display approximate continuous attractors with predicted slow manifold structures. Therefore, continuous attractors are functionally robust and remain useful as a universal analogy for understanding analog memory.

Read more

8/2/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Attractor Memory for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting: A Chaos Perspective

Jiaxi Hu, Yuehong Hu, Wei Chen, Ming Jin, Shirui Pan, Qingsong Wen, Yuxuan Liang

In long-term time series forecasting (LTSF) tasks, an increasing number of models have acknowledged that discrete time series originate from continuous dynamic systems and have attempted to model their dynamical structures. Recognizing the chaotic nature of real-world data, our model, textbf{textit{Attraos}}, incorporates chaos theory into LTSF, perceiving real-world time series as observations from unknown high-dimensional chaotic dynamic systems. Under the concept of attractor invariance, Attraos utilizes non-parametric Phase Space Reconstruction embedding and the proposed multi-scale dynamic memory unit to memorize historical dynamics structure and predicts by a frequency-enhanced local evolution strategy. Detailed theoretical analysis and abundant empirical evidence consistently show that Attraos outperforms various LTSF methods on mainstream LTSF datasets and chaotic datasets with only one-twelfth of the parameters compared to PatchTST.

Read more

6/21/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Stable Attractors for Neural networks classification via Ordinary Differential Equations (SA-nODE)

Raffaele Marino, Lorenzo Giambagli, Lorenzo Chicchi, Lorenzo Buffoni, Duccio Fanelli

A novel approach for supervised classification is presented which sits at the intersection of machine learning and dynamical systems theory. At variance with other methodologies that employ ordinary differential equations for classification purposes, the untrained model is a priori constructed to accommodate for a set of pre-assigned stationary stable attractors. Classifying amounts to steer the dynamics towards one of the planted attractors, depending on the specificity of the processed item supplied as an input. Asymptotically the system will hence converge on a specific point of the explored multi-dimensional space, flagging the category of the object to be eventually classified. Working in this context, the inherent ability to perform classification, as acquired ex post by the trained model, is ultimately reflected in the shaped basin of attractions associated to each of the target stable attractors. The performance of the proposed method is here challenged against simple toy models crafted for the purpose, as well as by resorting to well established reference standards. Although this method does not reach the performance of state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms, it illustrates that continuous dynamical systems with closed analytical interaction terms can serve as high-performance classifiers.

Read more

5/21/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Continuous-Time Neural Networks Can Stably Memorize Random Spike Trains

Hugo Aguettaz, Hans-Andrea Loeliger

The paper explores the capability of continuous-time recurrent neural networks to store and recall precisely timed spike patterns. We show (by numerical experiments) that this is indeed possible: within some range of parameters, any random score of spike trains (for all neurons in the network) can be robustly memorized and autonomously reproduced with stable accurate relative timing of all spikes, with probability close to one. We also demonstrate associative recall under noisy conditions. In these experiments, the required synaptic weights are computed offline, to satisfy a template that encourages temporal stability.

Read more

8/6/2024