Behavior Trees Enable Structured Programming of Language Model Agents

Read original: arXiv:2404.07439 - Published 4/12/2024 by Richard Kelley
Total Score

0

Behavior Trees Enable Structured Programming of Language Model Agents

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of Behavior Trees (BTs) to enable structured programming of language model agents, which are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text.
  • The authors argue that BTs, a well-established programming paradigm in the field of robotics, can provide a flexible and modular approach to controlling the behavior of language model agents.
  • The paper demonstrates how BTs can be used to create more robust and controllable language model agents capable of performing complex, multi-step tasks.

Plain English Explanation

Behavior Trees are a way of organizing and controlling the behavior of complex systems, like robots or AI agents. They work by breaking down a task into smaller, manageable steps, and then connecting those steps together in a tree-like structure.

In this paper, the researchers explore how Behavior Trees can be used to control the behavior of language model agents - AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. The key idea is that by using Behavior Trees, you can create language model agents that are more structured, flexible, and controllable than traditional approaches.

For example, imagine you want to create a language model agent that can help you book a trip. Instead of just having the agent generate text, you could use a Behavior Tree to break down the task into smaller steps, like:

  1. Gather information about the trip (destination, dates, etc.)
  2. Search for and compare flight options
  3. Book the chosen flight
  4. Confirm the booking

By organizing the agent's behavior in this way, you can make it more robust and reliable, and also easier to debug and modify if needed. The Behavior Tree provides a clear, modular structure that makes the agent's decision-making process more transparent and understandable.

The researchers in this paper demonstrate how Behavior Trees can be applied to language model agents, and show that this approach can lead to better performance on complex, multi-step tasks compared to more traditional approaches. They believe that this integration of Behavior Trees and language models could be a important step towards creating more capable and controllable AI agents.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by discussing the limitations of traditional Transformer-based language models, which are a widely used type of language model. The authors argue that these models can struggle with tasks that require structured, multi-step reasoning, as they are primarily designed for generating coherent text rather than performing complex, goal-oriented behaviors.

To address this, the authors propose integrating Behavior Trees (BTs) with Transformer-based language models. BTs are a well-established programming paradigm in the field of robotics, where they are used to control the behavior of complex systems in a modular and flexible way.

The key idea is to use BTs to organize the decision-making and action-taking process of a language model agent. Each node in the BT represents a specific sub-task or decision point, and the connections between nodes define the logical flow of the agent's behavior.

The paper presents a detailed architecture for integrating BTs with Transformer-based language models. This includes mechanisms for translating natural language instructions into BT structures, as well as techniques for using the BT to guide the language model's generation of text and actions.

Through a series of experiments, the authors demonstrate that language model agents equipped with BTs are able to outperform traditional Transformer-based models on complex, multi-step tasks. The BT-based agents show greater task success, more reliable behavior, and better interpretability of their decision-making process.

The authors also discuss potential limitations and future research directions, such as scaling BT-based approaches to handle even more complex tasks and exploring ways to learn BT structures automatically from data.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for integrating Behavior Trees with Transformer-based language models, and the experimental results suggest that this approach can lead to significant improvements in the capabilities and reliability of language model agents.

One potential limitation is that the current implementation relies on manually-designed BT structures, which may limit the scalability of the approach to more complex tasks. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore techniques for automatically learning BT structures from data, similar to how neural networks are trained.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the benefits of BT-based control for language model agents, it does not directly compare this approach to other structured programming paradigms that have been explored in the literature, such as automated data science by empowering agents or collaborative programming of Behavior Trees. A more comprehensive comparison could help to situate the BT-based approach within the broader context of structured AI systems.

Overall, the paper makes a strong case for the potential of Behavior Trees to enable more robust and controllable language model agents. The integration of these two key technologies represents an important step towards developing more capable and trustworthy AI systems that can reliably perform complex, multi-step tasks.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of Behavior Trees (BTs) to enable structured programming of language model agents, addressing the limitations of traditional Transformer-based language models in performing complex, goal-oriented tasks.

The authors demonstrate how BTs can be integrated with Transformer-based language models to create agents that are more robust, flexible, and interpretable. Through experiments, they show that BT-based agents outperform traditional language models on complex, multi-step tasks.

While the current implementation relies on manually-designed BT structures, the authors suggest that future work could explore techniques for automatically learning BT structures from data. Additionally, a more comprehensive comparison to other structured programming approaches for AI systems could help to further situate the BT-based approach.

Overall, the integration of Behavior Trees and language models represents an important step towards developing more capable and trustworthy AI systems that can reliably perform complex, goal-oriented tasks. This research has the potential to significantly impact the field of AI and the development of more advanced language model agents.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Behavior Trees Enable Structured Programming of Language Model Agents
Total Score

0

Behavior Trees Enable Structured Programming of Language Model Agents

Richard Kelley

Language models trained on internet-scale data sets have shown an impressive ability to solve problems in Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision. However, experience is showing that these models are frequently brittle in unexpected ways, and require significant scaffolding to ensure that they operate correctly in the larger systems that comprise language-model agents. In this paper, we argue that behavior trees provide a unifying framework for combining language models with classical AI and traditional programming. We introduce Dendron, a Python library for programming language model agents using behavior trees. We demonstrate the approach embodied by Dendron in three case studies: building a chat agent, a camera-based infrastructure inspection agent for use on a mobile robot or vehicle, and an agent that has been built to satisfy safety constraints that it did not receive through instruction tuning or RLHF.

Read more

4/12/2024

🤔

Total Score

0

Integrating Intent Understanding and Optimal Behavior Planning for Behavior Tree Generation from Human Instructions

Xinglin Chen, Yishuai Cai, Yunxin Mao, Minglong Li, Wenjing Yang, Weixia Xu, Ji Wang

Robots executing tasks following human instructions in domestic or industrial environments essentially require both adaptability and reliability. Behavior Tree (BT) emerges as an appropriate control architecture for these scenarios due to its modularity and reactivity. Existing BT generation methods, however, either do not involve interpreting natural language or cannot theoretically guarantee the BTs' success. This paper proposes a two-stage framework for BT generation, which first employs large language models (LLMs) to interpret goals from high-level instructions, then constructs an efficient goal-specific BT through the Optimal Behavior Tree Expansion Algorithm (OBTEA). We represent goals as well-formed formulas in first-order logic, effectively bridging intent understanding and optimal behavior planning. Experiments in the service robot validate the proficiency of LLMs in producing grammatically correct and accurately interpreted goals, demonstrate OBTEA's superiority over the baseline BT Expansion algorithm in various metrics, and finally confirm the practical deployability of our framework. The project website is https://dids-ei.github.io/Project/LLM-OBTEA/.

Read more

6/28/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Introducing Brain-like Concepts to Embodied Hand-crafted Dialog Management System

Frank Joublin, Antonello Ceravola, Cristian Sandu

Along with the development of chatbot, language models and speech technologies, there is a growing possibility and interest of creating systems able to interface with humans seamlessly through natural language or directly via speech. In this paper, we want to demonstrate that placing the research on dialog system in the broader context of embodied intelligence allows to introduce concepts taken from neurobiology and neuropsychology to define behavior architecture that reconcile hand-crafted design and artificial neural network and open the gate to future new learning approaches like imitation or learning by instruction. To do so, this paper presents a neural behavior engine that allows creation of mixed initiative dialog and action generation based on hand-crafted models using a graphical language. A demonstration of the usability of such brain-like inspired architecture together with a graphical dialog model is described through a virtual receptionist application running on a semi-public space.

Read more

6/14/2024

Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models
Total Score

55

Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models

Andy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Haohan Wang, Yu-Xiong Wang

While language models (LMs) have shown potential across a range of decision-making tasks, their reliance on simple acting processes limits their broad deployment as autonomous agents. In this paper, we introduce Language Agent Tree Search (LATS) -- the first general framework that synergizes the capabilities of LMs in reasoning, acting, and planning. By leveraging the in-context learning ability of LMs, we integrate Monte Carlo Tree Search into LATS to enable LMs as agents, along with LM-powered value functions and self-reflections for proficient exploration and enhanced decision-making. A key feature of our approach is the incorporation of an environment for external feedback, which offers a more deliberate and adaptive problem-solving mechanism that surpasses the constraints of existing techniques. Our experimental evaluation across diverse domains, including programming, interactive question-answering (QA), web navigation, and math, validates the effectiveness and generality of LATS in decision-making while maintaining competitive or improved reasoning performance. Notably, LATS achieves state-of-the-art pass@1 accuracy (92.7%) for programming on HumanEval with GPT-4 and demonstrates gradient-free performance (average score of 75.9) comparable to gradient-based fine-tuning for web navigation on WebShop with GPT-3.5. Code can be found at https://github.com/lapisrocks/LanguageAgentTreeSearch

Read more

6/7/2024