Behind the Deepfake: 8% Create; 90% Concerned. Surveying public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UK
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper surveyed the UK public's exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes - realistic-looking media manipulations created using AI.
- Key findings include that 8% of respondents reported creating deepfakes, while 90% expressed concern about the technology.
- The study explores public awareness, attitudes, and potential impacts of deepfakes on trust in media and institutions.
Plain English Explanation
Deepfakes are a type of AI-generated media that can be used to create fake images, videos, or audio that appear very realistic. This paper looked at how common deepfakes are in the UK and what people in the UK think about them.
The researchers found that a small portion, around 8%, of people surveyed said they had actually created deepfakes themselves. However, a much larger percentage, around 90%, expressed concern about deepfakes and how they could be used.
The paper explores how aware the public is of deepfakes, what their attitudes are towards this technology, and how deepfakes could impact people's trust in the media and other important institutions. Overall, the findings suggest there is significant public worry about the potential harms of deepfakes, even though relatively few people are making them themselves.
Technical Explanation
The study used an online survey to assess public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UK. A representative sample of 2,019 UK adults were asked about their awareness, experiences, and attitudes related to deepfakes.
Key metrics measured included:
- Prevalence of deepfake creation (8% reported creating a deepfake)
- Levels of concern about deepfakes (90% expressed concern)
- Perceived impacts on trust in media, public figures, and institutions
The survey also probed respondents' understanding of deepfakes, how they encountered them, and their views on potential harms and regulations.
The results indicate a high level of public awareness and apprehension about deepfakes, even among those who have not personally created them. The researchers suggest this may stem from prominent media coverage and public awareness campaigns around the risks of deepfake technology.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the public's engagement with and perceptions of deepfakes. By surveying a representative sample, the researchers were able to obtain a broad view of deepfake-related attitudes in the UK.
However, the study is limited in that it only captures a snapshot in time. As deepfake technology continues to evolve and become more accessible, public awareness and behaviors may shift. Longitudinal research would be needed to track changes over time.
Additionally, the study does not explore the nuances of deepfake creation and use cases. Understanding the motivations and contexts behind deepfake production could provide more context around the "8% create" statistic.
Further research is also needed to assess the real-world impacts of deepfakes on trust, as the survey focused on perceptions rather than direct behavioral changes. Examining how deepfakes affect decision-making, information sharing, and interactions with institutions would be a valuable next step.
Conclusion
This study sheds light on the complex public landscape around deepfakes in the UK. While a small percentage report creating deepfakes themselves, a large majority express significant concern about the technology and its potential harms.
The findings suggest that deepfakes are an issue of growing public awareness and apprehension, with implications for trust in media, public figures, and institutions. As deepfake technology continues to advance, ongoing research will be crucial to understanding its societal impacts and informing appropriate policy responses.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Behind the Deepfake: 8% Create; 90% Concerned. Surveying public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UK
Tvesha Sippy, Florence Enock, Jonathan Bright, Helen Z. Margetts
This article examines public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes based on insights from a nationally representative survey of 1403 UK adults. The survey is one of the first of its kind since recent improvements in deepfake technology and widespread adoption of political deepfakes. The findings reveal three key insights. First, on average, 15% of people report exposure to harmful deepfakes, including deepfake pornography, deepfake frauds/scams and other potentially harmful deepfakes such as those that spread health/religious misinformation/propaganda. In terms of common targets, exposure to deepfakes featuring celebrities was 50.2%, whereas those featuring politicians was 34.1%. And 5.7% of respondents recall exposure to a selection of high profile political deepfakes in the UK. Second, while exposure to harmful deepfakes was relatively low, awareness of and fears about deepfakes were high (and women were significantly more likely to report experiencing such fears than men). As with fears, general concerns about the spread of deepfakes were also high; 90.4% of the respondents were either very concerned or somewhat concerned about this issue. Most respondents (at least 91.8%) were concerned that deepfakes could add to online child sexual abuse material, increase distrust in information and manipulate public opinion. Third, while awareness about deepfakes was high, usage of deepfake tools was relatively low (8%). Most respondents were not confident about their detection abilities and were trustful of audiovisual content online. Our work highlights how the problem of deepfakes has become embedded in public consciousness in just a few years; it also highlights the need for media literacy programmes and other policy interventions to address the spread of harmful deepfakes.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Unmasking Illusions: Understanding Human Perception of Audiovisual Deepfakes
Ammarah Hashmi, Sahibzada Adil Shahzad, Chia-Wen Lin, Yu Tsao, Hsin-Min Wang
The emergence of contemporary deepfakes has attracted significant attention in machine learning research, as artificial intelligence (AI) generated synthetic media increases the incidence of misinterpretation and is difficult to distinguish from genuine content. Currently, machine learning techniques have been extensively studied for automatically detecting deepfakes. However, human perception has been less explored. Malicious deepfakes could ultimately cause public and social problems. Can we humans correctly perceive the authenticity of the content of the videos we watch? The answer is obviously uncertain; therefore, this paper aims to evaluate the human ability to discern deepfake videos through a subjective study. We present our findings by comparing human observers to five state-ofthe-art audiovisual deepfake detection models. To this end, we used gamification concepts to provide 110 participants (55 native English speakers and 55 non-native English speakers) with a webbased platform where they could access a series of 40 videos (20 real and 20 fake) to determine their authenticity. Each participant performed the experiment twice with the same 40 videos in different random orders. The videos are manually selected from the FakeAVCeleb dataset. We found that all AI models performed better than humans when evaluated on the same 40 videos. The study also reveals that while deception is not impossible, humans tend to overestimate their detection capabilities. Our experimental results may help benchmark human versus machine performance, advance forensics analysis, and enable adaptive countermeasures.
Read more5/8/2024
🤔
0
Examining the Implications of Deepfakes for Election Integrity
Hriday Ranka, Mokshit Surana, Neel Kothari, Veer Pariawala, Pratyay Banerjee, Aditya Surve, Sainath Reddy Sankepally, Raghav Jain, Jhagrut Lalwani, Swapneel Mehta
It is becoming cheaper to launch disinformation operations at scale using AI-generated content, in particular 'deepfake' technology. We have observed instances of deepfakes in political campaigns, where generated content is employed to both bolster the credibility of certain narratives (reinforcing outcomes) and manipulate public perception to the detriment of targeted candidates or causes (adversarial outcomes). We discuss the threats from deepfakes in politics, highlight model specifications underlying different types of deepfake generation methods, and contribute an accessible evaluation of the efficacy of existing detection methods. We provide this as a summary for lawmakers and civil society actors to understand how the technology may be applied in light of existing policies regulating its use. We highlight the limitations of existing detection mechanisms and discuss the areas where policies and regulations are required to address the challenges of deepfakes.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Violation of my body: Perceptions of AI-generated non-consensual (intimate) imagery
Natalie Grace Brigham, Miranda Wei, Tadayoshi Kohno, Elissa M. Redmiles
AI technology has enabled the creation of deepfakes: hyper-realistic synthetic media. We surveyed 315 individuals in the U.S. on their views regarding the hypothetical non-consensual creation of deepfakes depicting them, including deepfakes portraying sexual acts. Respondents indicated strong opposition to creating and, even more so, sharing non-consensually created synthetic content, especially if that content depicts a sexual act. However, seeking out such content appeared more acceptable to some respondents. Attitudes around acceptability varied further based on the hypothetical creator's relationship to the participant, the respondent's gender and their attitudes towards sexual consent. This study provides initial insight into public perspectives of a growing threat and highlights the need for further research to inform social norms as well as ongoing policy conversations and technical developments in generative AI.
Read more6/18/2024