Benchmarking mortality risk prediction from electrocardiograms

Read original: arXiv:2406.17002 - Published 6/27/2024 by Platon Lukyanenko, Joshua Mayourian, Mingxuan Liu, John K. Triedman, Sunil J. Ghelani, William G. La Cava
Total Score

0

Benchmarking mortality risk prediction from electrocardiograms

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper benchmarks the performance of electrocardiogram (ECG) models in predicting mortality risk.
  • The researchers compare the predictive power of various ECG-based models, including deep learning and traditional statistical models, on a large dataset.
  • The findings provide insights into the state-of-the-art in using ECG data for risk prediction and identify areas for further improvement.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on using information from electrocardiograms (ECGs) to predict a person's risk of dying. ECGs are tests that measure the electrical activity of the heart and can provide valuable insights into a person's heart health.

The researchers in this study compared the performance of different models, including advanced deep learning techniques and more traditional statistical approaches, in predicting mortality risk from ECG data. They evaluated these models on a large dataset to get a comprehensive understanding of their capabilities.

The key findings from this research can help guide future work in this area. It sheds light on which ECG-based models are most effective at predicting mortality risk and identifies opportunities to further improve the accuracy and reliability of these predictions. This is important because being able to accurately assess a person's risk of dying can inform medical decisions and help save lives.

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this study (Prospects for AI-Enhanced ECG as Unified Screening) benchmarked the performance of various ECG-based models in predicting mortality risk. They evaluated deep learning models, such as those described in (Unlocking the Potential of Telemetry: Self-Supervised Learning for Continuous), as well as more traditional statistical approaches like those in (Large-Scale Neutral Comparison Study of Survival Models).

The models were trained and tested on a large, diverse dataset of ECG recordings and corresponding mortality outcomes. This allowed the researchers to comprehensively evaluate the models' predictive power and generalization capabilities.

The findings provide insights into the current state-of-the-art in using ECG data for risk prediction. The researchers identified areas where deep learning models excel, as well as limitations of these approaches that suggest opportunities for further improvement, as discussed in (Zero-Shot ECG Classification via Multimodal Learning) and (MEIT: Multi-Modal Electrocardiogram Instruction Tuning).

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and rigorous evaluation of ECG-based mortality prediction models. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, such as the potential for bias in the dataset and the need for further validation on more diverse populations.

One concern raised is the interpretability of the deep learning models, which can be seen as "black boxes" compared to more traditional statistical approaches. This is an important consideration, as model interpretability is crucial for building trust and ensuring appropriate clinical decision-making.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for these models to be deployed in real-world clinical settings. Further research is needed to understand the practical implementation challenges and ensure the models can be seamlessly integrated into healthcare workflows.

Conclusion

This paper makes a significant contribution to the field of ECG-based risk prediction by providing a comprehensive benchmark of the current state-of-the-art. The findings highlight the strong potential of deep learning models in this domain, while also identifying areas for further improvement.

The insights gained from this research can inform the development of more accurate and reliable ECG-based risk prediction tools, which could have a profound impact on public health by enabling more proactive and personalized healthcare interventions. As the field continues to evolve, ongoing research and collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and policymakers will be crucial to fully realize the benefits of this technology.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Benchmarking mortality risk prediction from electrocardiograms
Total Score

0

Benchmarking mortality risk prediction from electrocardiograms

Platon Lukyanenko, Joshua Mayourian, Mingxuan Liu, John K. Triedman, Sunil J. Ghelani, William G. La Cava

Several recent high-impact studies leverage large hospital-owned electrocardiographic (ECG) databases to model and predict patient mortality. MIMIC-IV, released September 2023, is the first comparable public dataset and includes 800,000 ECGs from a U.S. hospital system. Previously, the largest public ECG dataset was Code-15, containing 345,000 ECGs collected during routine care in Brazil. These datasets now provide an excellent resource for a broader audience to explore ECG survival modeling. Here, we benchmark survival model performance on Code-15 and MIMIC-IV with two neural network architectures, compare four deep survival modeling approaches to Cox regressions trained on classifier outputs, and evaluate performance at one to ten years. Our results yield AUROC and concordance scores comparable to past work (circa 0.8) and reasonable AUPRC scores (MIMIC-IV: 0.4-0.5, Code-15: 0.05-0.13) considering the fraction of ECG samples linked to a mortality (MIMIC-IV: 27%, Code-15: 4%). When evaluating models on the opposite dataset, AUROC and concordance values drop by 0.1-0.15, which may be due to cohort differences. All code and results are made public.

Read more

6/27/2024

Prospects for AI-Enhanced ECG as a Unified Screening Tool for Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Conditions -- An Explorative Study in Emergency Care
Total Score

0

Prospects for AI-Enhanced ECG as a Unified Screening Tool for Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Conditions -- An Explorative Study in Emergency Care

Nils Strodthoff, Juan Miguel Lopez Alcaraz, Wilhelm Haverkamp

Current deep learning algorithms designed for automatic ECG analysis have exhibited notable accuracy. However, akin to traditional electrocardiography, they tend to be narrowly focused and typically address a singular diagnostic condition. In this exploratory study, we specifically investigate the capability of a single model to predict a diverse range of both cardiac and non-cardiac discharge diagnoses based on a sole ECG collected in the emergency department. We find that 253, 81 cardiac, and 172 non-cardiac, ICD codes can be reliably predicted in the sense of exceeding an AUROC score of 0.8 in a statistically significant manner. This underscores the model's proficiency in handling a wide array of cardiac and non-cardiac diagnostic scenarios which demonstrates potential as a screening tool for diverse medical encounters.

Read more

5/14/2024

Optimizing Mortality Prediction for ICU Heart Failure Patients: Leveraging XGBoost and Advanced Machine Learning with the MIMIC-III Database
Total Score

0

Optimizing Mortality Prediction for ICU Heart Failure Patients: Leveraging XGBoost and Advanced Machine Learning with the MIMIC-III Database

Negin Ashrafi, Armin Abdollahi, Jiahong Zhang, Maryam Pishgar

Heart failure affects millions of people worldwide, significantly reducing quality of life and leading to high mortality rates. Despite extensive research, the relationship between heart failure and mortality rates among ICU patients is not fully understood, indicating the need for more accurate prediction models. This study analyzed data from 1,177 patients over 18 years old from the MIMIC-III database, identified using ICD-9 codes. Preprocessing steps included handling missing data, removing duplicates, treating skewness, and using oversampling techniques to address data imbalances. Through rigorous feature selection using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF), expert clinical input, and ablation studies, 46 key features were identified to enhance model performance. Our analysis compared several machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, LightGBM, and XGBoost. XGBoost emerged as the superior model, achieving a test AUC-ROC of 0.9228 (95% CI 0.8748 - 0.9613), significantly outperforming our previous work (AUC-ROC of 0.8766) and the best results reported in existing literature (AUC-ROC of 0.824). The improved model's success is attributed to advanced feature selection methods, robust preprocessing techniques, and comprehensive hyperparameter optimization through Grid-Search. SHAP analysis and feature importance evaluations based on XGBoost highlighted key variables like leucocyte count and RDW, providing valuable insights into the clinical factors influencing mortality risk. This framework offers significant support for clinicians, enabling them to identify high-risk ICU heart failure patients and improve patient outcomes through timely and informed interventions.

Read more

9/4/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

CNN Based Detection of Cardiovascular Diseases from ECG Images

Irem Sayin, Rana Gursoy, Buse Cicek, Yunus Emre Mert, Fatih Ozturk, Taha Emre Pamukcu, Ceylin Deniz Sevimli, Huseyin Uvet

This study develops a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model for detecting myocardial infarction (MI) from Electrocardiogram (ECG) images. The model, built using the InceptionV3 architecture and optimized through transfer learning, was trained using ECG data obtained from the Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology in Pakistan. The dataset includes ECG images representing four different cardiac conditions: myocardial infarction, abnormal heartbeat, history of myocardial infarction, and normal heart activity. The developed model successfully detects MI and other cardiovascular conditions with an accuracy of 93.27%. This study demonstrates that deep learning-based models can provide significant support to clinicians in the early detection and prevention of heart attacks.

Read more

9/2/2024