Between the AI and Me: Analysing Listeners' Perspectives on AI- and Human-Composed Progressive Metal Music
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Analyzes listeners' perspectives on AI-composed and human-composed progressive metal music
- Compares perceptions, preferences, and emotional responses to the two types of compositions
- Provides insights into the role of human vs. machine creativity in music
Plain English Explanation
This research paper explores how listeners perceive and respond to progressive metal music composed by AI systems versus music composed by humans. The researchers were interested in understanding people's preferences, emotional reactions, and overall impressions when listening to these two types of musical compositions.
The study found that listeners generally preferred the human-composed music, feeling it was more creative, emotional, and engaging. However, the AI-composed music was still seen as technically impressive and unique. Listeners also noted that the AI-generated music lacked the "human touch" and felt more mechanical or artificial.
Ultimately, this research provides insights into how people perceive the role of human versus machine creativity in music. It suggests that while AI can produce technically complex and novel compositions, there is still value placed on the emotional and expressive qualities of human-created music. This has implications for the integration of AI systems into music production and creative industries.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a series of experiments to compare listeners' perspectives on AI-composed and human-composed progressive metal music. They recruited participants to listen to and evaluate several music clips, some generated by AI and others composed by humans.
The experiment design included questionnaires and surveys to assess participants' preferences, emotional responses, and perceptions of factors like creativity, technicality, and authenticity. The researchers also collected qualitative feedback through open-ended questions.
The results showed that while listeners found the AI-composed music to be technically impressive, they generally preferred and felt more emotionally connected to the human-created compositions. Participants cited the "human touch" and expressive qualities of the human-composed music as key factors in their preferences.
The paper discusses how these findings relate to the ongoing debate around the role of AI in creative domains like music. The researchers note that AI systems can augment and enhance human creativity, but may struggle to fully replicate the emotive and subjective aspects of human-generated art.
Critical Analysis
The research provides valuable insights into how listeners perceive the differences between AI-composed and human-composed music. However, the study is limited in scope, focusing only on progressive metal music. It would be interesting to see if similar patterns emerge across other genres or styles of music.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific techniques or architectures used by the AI systems to generate the musical compositions. More technical details on the AI models and training processes could help contextualize the results and identify potential areas for improvement.
The researchers also acknowledge the need for further longitudinal studies to understand how listeners' perceptions and preferences may evolve as AI music generation capabilities advance. Exploring the collaborative potential between humans and AI in music creation could also be a fruitful avenue for future research.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the complex relationship between human and machine creativity in music. While AI systems can produce technically impressive compositions, listeners still tend to prefer and feel more emotionally connected to music created by humans. The findings suggest that the expressive and subjective qualities of human-generated art remain highly valued, even as AI continues to advance in the creative domain.
As AI becomes increasingly integrated into various industries, including music production, understanding the nuances of human-AI interaction and collaboration will be crucial. This research represents an important step in exploring these dynamics and informing the ongoing discussion around the role of AI in creative endeavors.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Between the AI and Me: Analysing Listeners' Perspectives on AI- and Human-Composed Progressive Metal Music
Pedro Sarmento, Jackson Loth, Mathieu Barthet
Generative AI models have recently blossomed, significantly impacting artistic and musical traditions. Research investigating how humans interact with and deem these models is therefore crucial. Through a listening and reflection study, we explore participants' perspectives on AI- vs human-generated progressive metal, in symbolic format, using rock music as a control group. AI-generated examples were produced by ProgGP, a Transformer-based model. We propose a mixed methods approach to assess the effects of generation type (human vs. AI), genre (progressive metal vs. rock), and curation process (random vs. cherry-picked). This combines quantitative feedback on genre congruence, preference, creativity, consistency, playability, humanness, and repeatability, and qualitative feedback to provide insights into listeners' experiences. A total of 32 progressive metal fans completed the study. Our findings validate the use of fine-tuning to achieve genre-specific specialization in AI music generation, as listeners could distinguish between AI-generated rock and progressive metal. Despite some AI-generated excerpts receiving similar ratings to human music, listeners exhibited a preference for human compositions. Thematic analysis identified key features for genre and AI vs. human distinctions. Finally, we consider the ethical implications of our work in promoting musical data diversity within MIR research by focusing on an under-explored genre.
Read more8/1/2024
0
Applications and Advances of Artificial Intelligence in Music Generation:A Review
Yanxu Chen, Linshu Huang, Tian Gou
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant progress in the field of music generation, driving innovation in music creation and applications. This paper provides a systematic review of the latest research advancements in AI music generation, covering key technologies, models, datasets, evaluation methods, and their practical applications across various fields. The main contributions of this review include: (1) presenting a comprehensive summary framework that systematically categorizes and compares different technological approaches, including symbolic generation, audio generation, and hybrid models, helping readers better understand the full spectrum of technologies in the field; (2) offering an extensive survey of current literature, covering emerging topics such as multimodal datasets and emotion expression evaluation, providing a broad reference for related research; (3) conducting a detailed analysis of the practical impact of AI music generation in various application domains, particularly in real-time interaction and interdisciplinary applications, offering new perspectives and insights; (4) summarizing the existing challenges and limitations of music quality evaluation methods and proposing potential future research directions, aiming to promote the standardization and broader adoption of evaluation techniques. Through these innovative summaries and analyses, this paper serves as a comprehensive reference tool for researchers and practitioners in AI music generation, while also outlining future directions for the field.
Read more9/6/2024
0
Reducing Barriers to the Use of Marginalised Music Genres in AI
Nick Bryan-Kinns, Zijin Li
AI systems for high quality music generation typically rely on extremely large musical datasets to train the AI models. This creates barriers to generating music beyond the genres represented in dominant datasets such as Western Classical music or pop music. We undertook a 4 month international research project summarised in this paper to explore the eXplainable AI (XAI) challenges and opportunities associated with reducing barriers to using marginalised genres of music with AI models. XAI opportunities identified included topics of improving transparency and control of AI models, explaining the ethics and bias of AI models, fine tuning large models with small datasets to reduce bias, and explaining style-transfer opportunities with AI models. Participants in the research emphasised that whilst it is hard to work with small datasets such as marginalised music and AI, such approaches strengthen cultural representation of underrepresented cultures and contribute to addressing issues of bias of deep learning models. We are now building on this project to bring together a global International Responsible AI Music community and invite people to join our network.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Conserving Human Creativity with Evolutionary Generative Algorithms: A Case Study in Music Generation
Justin Kilb, Caroline Ellis
This study explores the application of evolutionary generative algorithms in music production to preserve and enhance human creativity. By integrating human feedback into Differential Evolution algorithms, we produced six songs that were submitted to international record labels, all of which received contract offers. In addition to testing the commercial viability of these methods, this paper examines the long-term implications of content generation using traditional machine learning methods compared with evolutionary algorithms. Specifically, as current generative techniques continue to scale, the potential for computer-generated content to outpace human creation becomes likely. This trend poses a risk of exhausting the pool of human-created training data, potentially forcing generative machine learning models to increasingly depend on their random input functions for generating novel content. In contrast to a future of content generation guided by aimless random functions, our approach allows for individualized creative exploration, ensuring that computer-assisted content generation methods are human-centric and culturally relevant through time.
Read more6/11/2024