Biomedical Open Source Software: Crucial Packages and Hidden Heroes
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the crucial role of open-source software in biomedical research and highlights the contributions of "hidden heroes" - the developers who maintain these essential tools.
- It examines the network of interdependencies between open-source biomedical software packages and identifies key packages that are foundational to the broader ecosystem.
- The research provides insights into the collaborative nature of open-source development and the importance of supporting the maintainers of these critical software tools.
Plain English Explanation
Open-source software plays a vital role in biomedical research. These freely available software packages, often maintained by volunteer developers, enable researchers to analyze data, visualize results, and accelerate scientific discoveries. However, the individuals behind these essential tools are often unsung heroes, toiling away in the background to keep the software running smoothly.
This paper sheds light on the network of interdependencies between these open-source biomedical software packages. The researchers identified the key packages that form the foundation of the broader ecosystem, acting as critical hubs that support a wide range of research activities. By understanding the relationships between these packages and the individuals who maintain them, the study highlights the collaborative nature of open-source development and the importance of supporting these "hidden heroes" who play a vital role in advancing biomedical science.
Technical Explanation
The researchers employed a network analysis approach to construct a network of interdependencies between open-source biomedical software packages. They analyzed the patterns of dependencies and connections between these packages, identifying the most crucial and widely-used "hub" packages that serve as the backbone of the ecosystem.
Through this analysis, the study revealed the essential role played by a small number of foundational packages that are relied upon by a vast array of other software tools. These packages, maintained by dedicated developers, enable researchers to access a wide range of functionality and capabilities, from data analysis to visualization and beyond.
The findings highlight the collaborative nature of open-source development, where individual contributors work together to build and maintain these crucial software tools. The paper emphasizes the need to support these "hidden heroes" - the developers who selflessly devote their time and expertise to ensuring the continued availability and reliability of these indispensable resources.
Critical Analysis
The research provides valuable insights into the open-source ecosystem in biomedical research, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further exploration. For instance, the study focuses on a specific set of packages and may not capture the full breadth of the open-source landscape. Additionally, the analysis does not delve into the motivations, challenges, and sustainability concerns faced by the individual maintainers of these critical software tools.
While the paper highlights the importance of supporting the "hidden heroes" behind open-source biomedical software, it does not offer detailed recommendations or actionable steps for the research community to address this issue. Further research could explore strategies for enhancing the recognition, funding, and long-term sustainability of these essential software projects and their dedicated maintainers.
Conclusion
This study underscores the crucial role of open-source software in advancing biomedical research and the unsung contributions of the developers who maintain these vital tools. By mapping the network of interdependencies between open-source packages, the researchers have shed light on the foundational packages that serve as the backbone of the broader ecosystem.
The findings emphasize the collaborative nature of open-source development and the need to recognize and support the "hidden heroes" who keep these essential software resources running. As biomedical research increasingly relies on open-source tools, it is crucial to ensure the long-term sustainability and continuous improvement of these vital resources, ultimately accelerating scientific discoveries and improving human health.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Biomedical Open Source Software: Crucial Packages and Hidden Heroes
Andrew Nesbitt, Boris Veytsman, Daniel Mietchen, Eva Maxfield Brown, James Howison, Jo~ao Felipe Pimentel, Laurent H`ebert-Dufresne, Stephan Druskat
Despite the importance of scientific software for research, it is often not formally recognized and rewarded. This is especially true for foundation libraries, which are used by the software packages visible to the users, being ``hidden'' themselves. The funders and other organizations need to understand the complex network of computer programs that the modern research relies upon. In this work we used CZ Software Mentions Dataset to map the dependencies of the software used in biomedical papers and find the packages critical to the software ecosystems. We propose the centrality metrics for the network of software dependencies, analyze three ecosystems (PyPi, CRAN, Bioconductor) and determine the packages with the highest centrality.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Enhancing Biomedical Knowledge Discovery for Diseases: An End-To-End Open-Source Framework
Christos Theodoropoulos, Andrei Catalin Coman, James Henderson, Marie-Francine Moens
The ever-growing volume of biomedical publications creates a critical need for efficient knowledge discovery. In this context, we introduce an open-source end-to-end framework designed to construct knowledge around specific diseases directly from raw text. To facilitate research in disease-related knowledge discovery, we create two annotated datasets focused on Rett syndrome and Alzheimer's disease, enabling the identification of semantic relations between biomedical entities. Extensive benchmarking explores various ways to represent relations and entity representations, offering insights into optimal modeling strategies for semantic relation detection and highlighting language models' competence in knowledge discovery. We also conduct probing experiments using different layer representations and attention scores to explore transformers' ability to capture semantic relations.
Read more9/9/2024
🎯
0
Individual context-free online community health indicators fail to identify open source software sustainability
Yo Yehudi, Carole Goble, Caroline Jay
The global value of open source software is estimated to be in the billions or trillions worldwide1, but despite this, it is often under-resourced and subject to high-impact security vulnerabilities and stability failures2,3. In order to investigate factors contributing to open source community longevity, we monitored thirty-eight open source projects over the period of a year, focusing primarily, but not exclusively, on open science-related online code-oriented communities. We measured performance indicators, using both subjective and qualitative measures (participant surveys), as well as using computational scripts to retrieve and analyse indicators associated with these projects' online source control codebases. None of the projects were abandoned during this period, and only one project entered a planned shutdown. Project ages spanned from under one year to over forty years old at the start of the study, and results were highly heterogeneous, showing little commonality across documentation, mean response times for issues and code contributions, and available funding/staffing resources. Whilst source code-based indicators were able to offer some insights into project activity, we observed that similar indicators across different projects often had very different meanings when context was taken into account. We conclude that the individual context-free metrics we studied were not sufficient or essential for project longevity and sustainability, and might even become detrimental if used to support high-stakes decision making. When attempting to understand an online open community's longer-term sustainability, we recommend that researchers avoid cross-project quantitative comparisons, and advise instead that they use single-project-level assessments which combine quantitative measures with contextualising qualitative data.
Read more5/10/2024
📊
0
New!Learning and teaching biological data science in the Bioconductor community
Jenny Drnevich, Frederick J. Tan, Fabricio Almeida-Silva, Robert Castelo, Aedin C. Culhane, Sean Davis, Maria A. Doyle, Susan Holmes, Leo Lahti, Alexandru Mahmoud, Kozo Nishida, Marcel Ramos, Kevin Rue-Albrecht, David J. H. Shih, Laurent Gatto, Charlotte Soneson
Modern biological research is increasingly data-intensive, leading to a growing demand for effective training in biological data science. In this article, we provide an overview of key resources and best practices available within the Bioconductor project - an open-source software community focused on omics data analysis. This guide serves as a valuable reference for both learners and educators in the field.
Read more10/3/2024