Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints

2402.07692

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/22/2024 by Yunsheng Tian, Ane Zuniga, Xinwei Zhang, Johannes P. Durholt, Payel Das, Jie Chen, Wojciech Matusik, Mina Konakovi'c Lukovi'c

🛠️

Abstract

Bayesian optimization has been successfully applied to optimize black-box functions where the number of evaluations is severely limited. However, in many real-world applications, it is hard or impossible to know in advance which designs are feasible due to some physical or system limitations. These issues lead to an even more challenging problem of optimizing an unknown function with unknown constraints. In this paper, we observe that in such scenarios optimal solution typically lies on the boundary between feasible and infeasible regions of the design space, making it considerably more difficult than that with interior optima. Inspired by this observation, we propose BE-CBO, a new Bayesian optimization method that efficiently explores the boundary between feasible and infeasible designs. To identify the boundary, we learn the constraints with an ensemble of neural networks that outperform the standard Gaussian Processes for capturing complex boundaries. Our method demonstrates superior performance against state-of-the-art methods through comprehensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks. Code available at: https://github.com/yunshengtian/BE-CBO

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Bayesian optimization is a powerful technique for optimizing black-box functions, but it struggles when the feasible design space is unknown.
  • This paper proposes a new method called BE-CBO (Boundary Exploration Constrained Bayesian Optimization) that can efficiently explore the boundary between feasible and infeasible regions.
  • BE-CBO learns the constraints using an ensemble of neural networks, which outperforms standard Gaussian Processes for capturing complex boundaries.
  • The method demonstrates superior performance compared to state-of-the-art approaches on synthetic and real-world benchmarks.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian optimization is a technique used to find the best settings for complex systems or processes when you don't know the exact mathematical formula that describes how the system works. This is common in real-world applications, where the relationship between the input settings and the output performance is like a black box.

However, in many cases, there are also constraints on the feasible design space - certain input settings may not be physically possible or may cause the system to break down. When these constraints are unknown in advance, the optimization problem becomes even more challenging. The optimal solution often lies on the boundary between the feasible and infeasible regions, making it hard to find.

The researchers behind this paper observed this phenomenon and developed a new method called BE-CBO to address it. BE-CBO focuses on efficiently exploring the boundary between feasible and infeasible designs, using an ensemble of neural networks to learn the complex constraints. This allows it to outperform other Bayesian optimization techniques that struggle with unknown constraints.

Through comprehensive experiments, the researchers show that BE-CBO can find better solutions than state-of-the-art methods, especially when the feasible design space is not known in advance. This is an important advancement, as many real-world optimization problems involve unknown constraints that limit the set of viable designs.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new Bayesian optimization method called BE-CBO (Boundary Exploration Constrained Bayesian Optimization) that is designed to handle optimization problems with unknown constraints. The key innovation is the use of an ensemble of neural networks to learn the complex boundaries between feasible and infeasible regions of the design space.

Traditionally, Bayesian optimization has relied on Gaussian Processes to model the unknown objective function. However, Gaussian Processes struggle to capture the intricate shapes of constraint boundaries, especially when the feasible region is not convex. In contrast, the neural network ensemble used in BE-CBO is better able to represent these complex constraint boundaries.

The BE-CBO algorithm works by iteratively selecting new design points to evaluate, balancing exploration of the boundary region with exploitation of promising feasible designs. The neural network ensemble is used to estimate the probability of feasibility for each candidate design point, guiding the selection process.

The researchers evaluate BE-CBO on a variety of synthetic and real-world benchmark problems, including optimizing the design of an aircraft wing and tuning hyperparameters for machine learning models. The results show that BE-CBO consistently outperforms other state-of-the-art Bayesian optimization methods, especially when the constraints are highly nonlinear or have complex shapes.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the need to address optimization problems with unknown constraints, as this is a common challenge in many real-world applications. The proposed BE-CBO method is a promising approach that appears to offer significant performance improvements over existing techniques.

One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on an ensemble of neural networks to model the constraints. While this approach is shown to be effective, it may introduce additional computational complexity and hyperparameters to tune. The authors do not provide a detailed analysis of the tradeoffs involved in using neural networks versus other constraint modeling techniques, such as Gaussian Processes with more flexible kernel functions.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the sample efficiency of BE-CBO - that is, how many function evaluations are required to find good solutions compared to other methods. This is an important consideration, as many real-world optimization problems are extremely expensive to evaluate, and minimizing the number of trials is crucial.

Further research could also investigate the robustness of BE-CBO to noisy or uncertain constraint evaluations, as this is another common challenge in practical optimization problems. Extending the method to handle multi-objective optimization or stochastic constraints could also broaden its applicability.

Overall, this paper represents a valuable contribution to the field of Bayesian optimization, particularly for problems with unknown constraints. The BE-CBO method provides a promising framework for addressing these challenging optimization scenarios, and the strong experimental results suggest it deserves further investigation and development.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel Bayesian optimization method called BE-CBO that is designed to handle optimization problems with unknown constraints. By using an ensemble of neural networks to learn the complex boundaries between feasible and infeasible regions, BE-CBO can more effectively explore the design space and find optimal solutions.

The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of BE-CBO through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks, showing that it outperforms other state-of-the-art Bayesian optimization techniques. This is an important advancement, as many real-world optimization problems involve unknown constraints that limit the set of viable designs.

The work highlights the significance of addressing optimization challenges with unknown constraints, which are common in a wide range of applications, from engineering design to hyperparameter tuning for machine learning models. The BE-CBO method provides a promising framework for tackling these complex optimization problems, and the researchers' open-sourcing of the code will likely spur further development and adoption of the technique.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🛠️

Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimization

Wenjie Xu, Wenbin Wang, Yuning Jiang, Bratislav Svetozarevic, Colin N. Jones

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study the problem of preferential Bayesian optimization (BO), where we aim to optimize a black-box function with only preference feedback over a pair of candidate solutions. Inspired by the likelihood ratio idea, we construct a confidence set of the black-box function using only the preference feedback. An optimistic algorithm with an efficient computational method is then developed to solve the problem, which enjoys an information-theoretic bound on the total cumulative regret, a first-of-its-kind for preferential BO. This bound further allows us to design a scheme to report an estimated best solution, with a guaranteed convergence rate. Experimental results on sampled instances from Gaussian processes, standard test functions, and a thermal comfort optimization problem all show that our method stably achieves better or competitive performance as compared to the existing state-of-the-art heuristics, which, however, do not have theoretical guarantees on regret bounds or convergence.

Read more

5/30/2024

🛠️

Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization

Haoxian Chen, Henry Lam

YC

0

Reddit

0

Bayesian Optimization is a popular approach for optimizing expensive black-box functions. Its key idea is to use a surrogate model to approximate the objective and, importantly, quantify the associated uncertainty that allows a sequential search of query points that balance exploitation-exploration. Gaussian process (GP) has been a primary candidate for the surrogate model, thanks to its Bayesian-principled uncertainty quantification power and modeling flexibility. However, its challenges have also spurred an array of alternatives whose convergence properties could be more opaque. Motivated by these, we study in this paper an axiomatic framework that elicits the minimal requirements to guarantee black-box optimization convergence that could apply beyond GP-based methods. Moreover, we leverage the design freedom in our framework, which we call Pseudo-Bayesian Optimization, to construct empirically superior algorithms. In particular, we show how using simple local regression, and a suitable randomized prior construction to quantify uncertainty, not only guarantees convergence but also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks in examples ranging from high-dimensional synthetic experiments to realistic hyperparameter tuning and robotic applications.

Read more

6/21/2024

🛠️

Transition Constrained Bayesian Optimization via Markov Decision Processes

Jose Pablo Folch, Calvin Tsay, Robert M Lee, Behrang Shafei, Weronika Ormaniec, Andreas Krause, Mark van der Wilk, Ruth Misener, Mojm'ir Mutn'y

YC

0

Reddit

0

Bayesian optimization is a methodology to optimize black-box functions. Traditionally, it focuses on the setting where you can arbitrarily query the search space. However, many real-life problems do not offer this flexibility; in particular, the search space of the next query may depend on previous ones. Example challenges arise in the physical sciences in the form of local movement constraints, required monotonicity in certain variables, and transitions influencing the accuracy of measurements. Altogether, such transition constraints necessitate a form of planning. This work extends classical Bayesian optimization via the framework of Markov Decision Processes. We iteratively solve a tractable linearization of our utility function using reinforcement learning to obtain a policy that plans ahead for the entire horizon. This is a parallel to the optimization of an acquisition function in policy space. The resulting policy is potentially history-dependent and non-Markovian. We showcase applications in chemical reactor optimization, informative path planning, machine calibration, and other synthetic examples.

Read more

5/30/2024

Bayesian Optimization with Formal Safety Guarantees via Online Conformal Prediction

Bayesian Optimization with Formal Safety Guarantees via Online Conformal Prediction

Yunchuan Zhang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone

YC

0

Reddit

0

Black-box zero-th order optimization is a central primitive for applications in fields as diverse as finance, physics, and engineering. In a common formulation of this problem, a designer sequentially attempts candidate solutions, receiving noisy feedback on the value of each attempt from the system. In this paper, we study scenarios in which feedback is also provided on the safety of the attempted solution, and the optimizer is constrained to limit the number of unsafe solutions that are tried throughout the optimization process. Focusing on methods based on Bayesian optimization (BO), prior art has introduced an optimization scheme -- referred to as SAFEOPT -- that is guaranteed not to select any unsafe solution with a controllable probability over feedback noise as long as strict assumptions on the safety constraint function are met. In this paper, a novel BO-based approach is introduced that satisfies safety requirements irrespective of properties of the constraint function. This strong theoretical guarantee is obtained at the cost of allowing for an arbitrary, controllable but non-zero, rate of violation of the safety constraint. The proposed method, referred to as SAFE-BOCP, builds on online conformal prediction (CP) and is specialized to the cases in which feedback on the safety constraint is either noiseless or noisy. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world data validate the advantages and flexibility of the proposed SAFE-BOCP.

Read more

5/14/2024