Bayesian Optimization with Formal Safety Guarantees via Online Conformal Prediction

2306.17815

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/14/2024 by Yunchuan Zhang, Sangwoo Park, Osvaldo Simeone
Bayesian Optimization with Formal Safety Guarantees via Online Conformal Prediction

Abstract

Black-box zero-th order optimization is a central primitive for applications in fields as diverse as finance, physics, and engineering. In a common formulation of this problem, a designer sequentially attempts candidate solutions, receiving noisy feedback on the value of each attempt from the system. In this paper, we study scenarios in which feedback is also provided on the safety of the attempted solution, and the optimizer is constrained to limit the number of unsafe solutions that are tried throughout the optimization process. Focusing on methods based on Bayesian optimization (BO), prior art has introduced an optimization scheme -- referred to as SAFEOPT -- that is guaranteed not to select any unsafe solution with a controllable probability over feedback noise as long as strict assumptions on the safety constraint function are met. In this paper, a novel BO-based approach is introduced that satisfies safety requirements irrespective of properties of the constraint function. This strong theoretical guarantee is obtained at the cost of allowing for an arbitrary, controllable but non-zero, rate of violation of the safety constraint. The proposed method, referred to as SAFE-BOCP, builds on online conformal prediction (CP) and is specialized to the cases in which feedback on the safety constraint is either noiseless or noisy. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world data validate the advantages and flexibility of the proposed SAFE-BOCP.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a novel approach to Bayesian optimization that provides formal safety guarantees during the optimization process.
  • The method combines Bayesian optimization with online conformal prediction to ensure that the optimization algorithm does not explore unsafe regions of the search space.
  • The proposed technique is applicable to a wide range of problems, including adaptive Bayesian optimization for high-precision motion systems and constrained zero-chance constrained POMDP planning.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to optimize complex systems and processes using Bayesian optimization, which is a popular machine learning technique. The key innovation is that it adds an extra layer of safety to the optimization process, ensuring that the algorithm doesn't explore regions that could be harmful or dangerous.

Imagine you're trying to find the perfect temperature and pressure settings for a chemical reactor. Traditionally, you'd use Bayesian optimization to systematically explore different settings and find the optimal configuration. However, some settings could be unsafe and lead to an explosion or other catastrophic event.

The method proposed in this paper combines Bayesian optimization with a technique called "online conformal prediction." This allows the optimization algorithm to learn which settings are safe and which are not, and it will automatically avoid the unsafe regions during the optimization process. This provides formal mathematical guarantees that the optimization will stay within safe bounds, even as it explores new settings.

This safety feature makes the technique applicable to a wide range of practical problems, such as optimizing high-precision motion systems or planning under uncertainty in robotics, where safety is paramount. By combining the power of Bayesian optimization with rigorous safety guarantees, this approach has the potential to unlock new applications and drive progress in various fields.

Technical Explanation

The key technical innovation in this paper is the integration of Bayesian optimization with online conformal prediction.

Bayesian optimization is a powerful technique for optimizing complex, expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions. It builds a probabilistic model of the objective function and intelligently selects new points to evaluate, balancing exploration and exploitation. However, standard Bayesian optimization does not provide any formal guarantees about the safety of the optimization process.

The authors address this by coupling Bayesian optimization with online conformal prediction. Conformal prediction is a framework for constructing statistical prediction sets that are guaranteed to contain the true outcome with a pre-specified probability, even in the presence of arbitrary data-generating processes.

By integrating online conformal prediction into the Bayesian optimization loop, the authors are able to construct prediction sets that contain the true objective function value with high probability. This allows the optimization algorithm to avoid exploring regions of the search space that are likely to be unsafe, while still efficiently exploring the safe regions.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on a range of practical optimization problems, including adaptive Bayesian optimization for high-precision motion systems and constrained zero-chance constrained POMDP planning. The results show that the proposed method can achieve significant performance improvements over standard Bayesian optimization while providing strong safety guarantees.

Critical Analysis

The authors have presented a well-designed and thorough study that addresses an important problem in the field of Bayesian optimization. The integration of online conformal prediction is a clever and principled way to introduce safety guarantees into the optimization process.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on the assumption that the underlying objective function satisfies certain regularity conditions required by the conformal prediction framework. While the authors provide theoretical analysis to justify these assumptions, it would be valuable to see the method applied to a broader range of real-world problems to assess its practical limitations and robustness.

Additionally, the computational overhead of the conformal prediction step may be non-trivial, especially for high-dimensional problems. The authors acknowledge this challenge and suggest potential optimizations, but further investigation into the scalability of the approach would be helpful.

Another area for future research could be the extension of this work to handle stochastic online optimization problems, where the objective function is subject to random noise or disturbances. Incorporating safety guarantees in such dynamic environments could further broaden the applicability of the proposed method.

Overall, this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of Bayesian optimization and safe exploration, and the authors have made a valuable contribution to the literature. The proposed technique has the potential to enable the deployment of Bayesian optimization in a wider range of safety-critical applications.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to Bayesian optimization that provides formal safety guarantees during the optimization process. By integrating online conformal prediction into the Bayesian optimization framework, the authors have developed a technique that can efficiently explore the safe regions of the search space while avoiding unsafe areas.

The proposed method has been theoretically analyzed and empirically validated on a range of practical optimization problems, demonstrating its effectiveness and broad applicability. The safety guarantees provided by this approach could enable the use of Bayesian optimization in a variety of safety-critical domains, such as adaptive motion control, robotic planning under uncertainty, and stochastic online optimization for cyber-physical systems.

As the field of Bayesian optimization continues to evolve, this work represents an important step forward in bridging the gap between the theoretical promise of Bayesian optimization and its practical deployment in real-world, safety-critical applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

🛠️

Towards Safe Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization

Jannis O. Lubsen, Christian Hespe, Annika Eichler

YC

0

Reddit

0

Bayesian optimization has emerged as a highly effective tool for the safe online optimization of systems, due to its high sample efficiency and noise robustness. To further enhance its efficiency, reduced physical models of the system can be incorporated into the optimization process, accelerating it. These models are able to offer an approximation of the actual system, and evaluating them is significantly cheaper. The similarity between the model and reality is represented by additional hyperparameters, which are learned within the optimization process. Safety is a crucial criterion for online optimization methods such as Bayesian optimization, which has been addressed by recent works that provide safety guarantees under the assumption of known hyperparameters. In practice, however, this does not apply. Therefore, we extend the robust Gaussian process uniform error bounds to meet the multi-task setting, which involves the calculation of a confidence region from the hyperparameter posterior distribution utilizing Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Subsequently, the robust safety bounds are employed to facilitate the safe optimization of the system, while incorporating measurements of the models. Simulation results indicate that the optimization can be significantly accelerated for expensive to evaluate functions in comparison to other state-of-the-art safe Bayesian optimization methods, contingent on the fidelity of the models.

Read more

6/18/2024

Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization

Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization

Alessandro G. Bottero, Carlos E. Luis, Julia Vinogradska, Felix Berkenkamp, Jan Peters

YC

0

Reddit

0

We consider a sequential decision making task, where the goal is to optimize an unknown function without evaluating parameters that violate an a~priori unknown (safety) constraint. A common approach is to place a Gaussian process prior on the unknown functions and allow evaluations only in regions that are safe with high probability. Most current methods rely on a discretization of the domain and cannot be directly extended to the continuous case. Moreover, the way in which they exploit regularity assumptions about the constraint introduces an additional critical hyperparameter. In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic safe exploration criterion that directly exploits the GP posterior to identify the most informative safe parameters to evaluate. The combination of this exploration criterion with a well known Bayesian optimization acquisition function yields a novel safe Bayesian optimization selection criterion. Our approach is naturally applicable to continuous domains and does not require additional explicit hyperparameters. We theoretically analyze the method and show that we do not violate the safety constraint with high probability and that we learn about the value of the safe optimum up to arbitrary precision. Empirical evaluations demonstrate improved data-efficiency and scalability.

Read more

5/13/2024

🛠️

Principled Preferential Bayesian Optimization

Wenjie Xu, Wenbin Wang, Yuning Jiang, Bratislav Svetozarevic, Colin N. Jones

YC

0

Reddit

0

We study the problem of preferential Bayesian optimization (BO), where we aim to optimize a black-box function with only preference feedback over a pair of candidate solutions. Inspired by the likelihood ratio idea, we construct a confidence set of the black-box function using only the preference feedback. An optimistic algorithm with an efficient computational method is then developed to solve the problem, which enjoys an information-theoretic bound on the total cumulative regret, a first-of-its-kind for preferential BO. This bound further allows us to design a scheme to report an estimated best solution, with a guaranteed convergence rate. Experimental results on sampled instances from Gaussian processes, standard test functions, and a thermal comfort optimization problem all show that our method stably achieves better or competitive performance as compared to the existing state-of-the-art heuristics, which, however, do not have theoretical guarantees on regret bounds or convergence.

Read more

5/30/2024

🔮

Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization

Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov

YC

0

Reddit

0

Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.

Read more

6/27/2024