Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Benchmarking Transfer Evolutionary Optimization
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores the challenge of bridging the gap between the theoretical and practical aspects of transfer evolutionary optimization
- Introduces a benchmark suite to evaluate the performance of transfer evolutionary optimization algorithms on practical test problems
- Aims to provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the capabilities and limitations of transfer evolutionary optimization techniques
Plain English Explanation
This research paper addresses the challenge of translating the theoretical principles of transfer evolutionary optimization into practical applications. Transfer evolutionary optimization is a technique that allows an optimization algorithm to learn from previous experiences and apply that knowledge to solve new, related problems more efficiently.
The paper proposes a benchmark suite, which is a collection of test problems designed to evaluate the performance of transfer evolutionary optimization algorithms. These test problems are meant to be more representative of real-world scenarios, as opposed to the idealized problems often used in theoretical research.
By providing a standardized set of benchmarks, the researchers hope to bridge the gap between the theoretical understanding of transfer evolutionary optimization and its practical implementation. This will help researchers and practitioners assess the capabilities and limitations of these techniques, ultimately leading to more effective and impactful applications in fields like engineering, finance, and beyond.
Technical Explanation
The paper first introduces the concept of transfer evolutionary optimization, which builds on the idea of the no free lunch theorem. This theorem states that no single optimization algorithm can outperform all others across all possible problems. Transfer evolutionary optimization aims to overcome this limitation by allowing algorithms to learn from previous experiences and apply that knowledge to new, related problems.
To evaluate the performance of transfer evolutionary optimization algorithms, the researchers propose a benchmark suite composed of practical test problems. These problems are designed to be more representative of real-world scenarios, unlike the idealized test functions often used in theoretical research. The benchmark suite includes a diverse set of optimization problems, such as multi-objective optimization, dynamic optimization, and multi-task optimization.
By testing transfer evolutionary optimization algorithms on this benchmark suite, the researchers hope to provide a comprehensive framework for assessing their capabilities and limitations. This will help bridge the gap between the theoretical understanding of transfer evolutionary optimization and its practical application in real-world scenarios.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that the proposed benchmark suite may not capture all the nuances of real-world optimization problems, and that further refinement and expansion of the suite may be necessary. Additionally, the paper does not address the challenge of automatically configuring the exploration-exploitation trade-off in evolutionary algorithms, which is an important factor in their performance.
While the paper provides a valuable framework for evaluating transfer evolutionary optimization, it would be interesting to see the authors explore the impact of different problem characteristics, such as the degree of similarity between tasks, on the performance of transfer learning techniques. Further research in this direction could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of transfer evolutionary optimization.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a significant step towards bridging the gap between the theoretical and practical aspects of transfer evolutionary optimization. By introducing a benchmark suite of practical test problems, the researchers have provided a comprehensive framework for assessing the capabilities and limitations of transfer evolutionary optimization algorithms.
The proposed benchmark suite is a valuable resource for both researchers and practitioners in the field of evolutionary computation. By testing their algorithms on these realistic problems, researchers can gain a better understanding of the real-world performance of transfer evolutionary optimization techniques. This, in turn, can lead to the development of more effective and impactful applications in a wide range of domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice: Benchmarking Transfer Evolutionary Optimization
Yaqing Hou, Wenqiang Ma, Abhishek Gupta, Kavitesh Kumar Bali, Hongwei Ge, Qiang Zhang, Carlos A. Coello Coello, Yew-Soon Ong
In recent years, the field of Transfer Evolutionary Optimization (TrEO) has witnessed substantial growth, fueled by the realization of its profound impact on solving complex problems. Numerous algorithms have emerged to address the challenges posed by transferring knowledge between tasks. However, the recently highlighted ``no free lunch theorem'' in transfer optimization clarifies that no single algorithm reigns supreme across diverse problem types. This paper addresses this conundrum by adopting a benchmarking approach to evaluate the performance of various TrEO algorithms in realistic scenarios. Despite the growing methodological focus on transfer optimization, existing benchmark problems often fall short due to inadequate design, predominantly featuring synthetic problems that lack real-world relevance. This paper pioneers a practical TrEO benchmark suite, integrating problems from the literature categorized based on the three essential aspects of Big Source Task-Instances: volume, variety, and velocity. Our primary objective is to provide a comprehensive analysis of existing TrEO algorithms and pave the way for the development of new approaches to tackle practical challenges. By introducing realistic benchmarks that embody the three dimensions of volume, variety, and velocity, we aim to foster a deeper understanding of algorithmic performance in the face of diverse and complex transfer scenarios. This benchmark suite is poised to serve as a valuable resource for researchers, facilitating the refinement and advancement of TrEO algorithms in the pursuit of solving real-world problems.
Read more4/23/2024
0
Bayesian Inverse Transfer in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization
Jiao Liu, Abhishek Gupta, Yew-Soon Ong
Transfer optimization enables data-efficient optimization of a target task by leveraging experiential priors from related source tasks. This is especially useful in multiobjective optimization settings where a set of trade-off solutions is sought under tight evaluation budgets. In this paper, we introduce a novel concept of textit{inverse transfer} in multiobjective optimization. Inverse transfer stands out by employing Bayesian inverse Gaussian process models to map performance vectors in the objective space to population search distributions in task-specific decision space, facilitating knowledge transfer through objective space unification. Building upon this idea, we introduce the first Inverse Transfer Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimizer (invTrEMO). A key highlight of invTrEMO is its ability to harness the common objective functions prevalent in many application areas, even when decision spaces do not precisely align between tasks. This allows invTrEMO to uniquely and effectively utilize information from heterogeneous source tasks as well. Furthermore, invTrEMO yields high-precision inverse models as a significant byproduct, enabling the generation of tailored solutions on-demand based on user preferences. Empirical studies on multi- and many-objective benchmark problems, as well as a practical case study, showcase the faster convergence rate and modelling accuracy of the invTrEMO relative to state-of-the-art evolutionary and Bayesian optimization algorithms. The source code of the invTrEMO is made available at https://github.com/LiuJ-2023/invTrEMO.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Exploring Knowledge Transfer in Evolutionary Many-task Optimization: A Complex Network Perspective
Yudong Yang, Kai Wu, Xiangyi Teng, Handing Wang, He Yu, Jing Liu
The field of evolutionary many-task optimization (EMaTO) is increasingly recognized for its ability to streamline the resolution of optimization challenges with repetitive characteristics, thereby conserving computational resources. This paper tackles the challenge of crafting efficient knowledge transfer mechanisms within EMaTO, a task complicated by the computational demands of individual task evaluations. We introduce a novel framework that employs a complex network to comprehensively analyze the dynamics of knowledge transfer between tasks within EMaTO. By extracting and scrutinizing the knowledge transfer network from existing EMaTO algorithms, we evaluate the influence of network modifications on overall algorithmic efficacy. Our findings indicate that these networks are diverse, displaying community-structured directed graph characteristics, with their network density adapting to different task sets. This research underscores the viability of integrating complex network concepts into EMaTO to refine knowledge transfer processes, paving the way for future advancements in the domain.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Surrogate-Assisted Search with Competitive Knowledge Transfer for Expensive Optimization
Xiaoming Xue, Yao Hu, Liang Feng, Kai Zhang, Linqi Song, Kay Chen Tan
Expensive optimization problems (EOPs) have attracted increasing research attention over the decades due to their ubiquity in a variety of practical applications. Despite many sophisticated surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) that have been developed for solving such problems, most of them lack the ability to transfer knowledge from previously-solved tasks and always start their search from scratch, making them troubled by the notorious cold-start issue. A few preliminary studies that integrate transfer learning into SAEAs still face some issues, such as defective similarity quantification that is prone to underestimate promising knowledge, surrogate-dependency that makes the transfer methods not coherent with the state-of-the-art in SAEAs, etc. In light of the above, a plug and play competitive knowledge transfer method is proposed to boost various SAEAs in this paper. Specifically, both the optimized solutions from the source tasks and the promising solutions acquired by the target surrogate are treated as task-solving knowledge, enabling them to compete with each other to elect the winner for expensive evaluation, thus boosting the search speed on the target task. Moreover, the lower bound of the convergence gain brought by the knowledge competition is mathematically analyzed, which is expected to strengthen the theoretical foundation of sequential transfer optimization. Experimental studies conducted on a series of benchmark problems and a practical application from the petroleum industry verify the efficacy of the proposed method. The source code of the competitive knowledge transfer is available at https://github.com/XmingHsueh/SAS-CKT.
Read more8/21/2024