Bridging Information Gaps in Dialogues With Grounded Exchanges Using Knowledge Graphs

Read original: arXiv:2408.01088 - Published 8/13/2024 by Phillip Schneider, Nektarios Machner, Kristiina Jokinen, Florian Matthes
Total Score

0

Bridging Information Gaps in Dialogues With Grounded Exchanges Using Knowledge Graphs

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a novel approach for bridging information gaps in dialogues using knowledge graphs.
  • The proposed method leverages knowledge graphs to enhance the information exchange between conversational agents and users.
  • The key idea is to ground the dialogue context in relevant factual knowledge and use it to fill in missing information during the conversation.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a way to improve the quality of conversations between people and AI systems. Often, conversations can have gaps where one person is missing important information needed to fully understand or respond to what the other person is saying. This paper introduces a technique that uses knowledge graphs to help fill in those gaps.

A knowledge graph is a way of organizing information about the world into a structured, interconnected format that an AI system can understand and reason over. By connecting the context of the conversation to relevant information in a knowledge graph, the AI system can identify and provide the missing details needed to have a more meaningful and informative exchange.

For example, if someone asks an AI assistant "What is the capital of France?", the assistant could use a knowledge graph to quickly lookup and provide the answer "Paris." But if the conversation then shifts to discussing the Eiffel Tower, the assistant could further enrich the discussion by using the knowledge graph to also mention that the Eiffel Tower is located in Paris, the capital of France.

By grounding the dialogue in this structured knowledge, the AI system can have more natural and informative conversations, bridging information gaps that would otherwise leave the user confused or unsatisfied. The key insight is that knowledge graphs can be a powerful tool for enhancing the coherence and informativeness of spoken dialogues.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel dialogue system architecture that leverages knowledge graphs to address information gaps that can arise during conversations. The core idea is to model the dialogue context as a knowledge-grounded exchange, where the system reasons over a knowledge graph to identify relevant facts that can enrich the user's understanding.

The proposed system consists of several key components:

  1. Dialogue State Tracker: Maintains an internal representation of the current state of the dialogue, including the user's intent, beliefs, and information needs.
  2. Knowledge Graph Reasoner: Queries a knowledge graph to retrieve facts relevant to the current dialogue state, using techniques like multi-hop reasoning.
  3. Response Generator: Synthesizes an informative and coherent response by combining the retrieved knowledge graph facts with the dialogue context.

During the conversation, the system continuously updates its understanding of the user's information needs by tracking the dialogue state. It then queries the knowledge graph to find relevant facts that can help fill any gaps or ambiguities in the user's knowledge. These facts are then incorporated into the system's final response, resulting in a more grounded and informative exchange.

The authors evaluate their approach on several dialogue benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness at bridging information gaps and improving the overall quality of the conversations, compared to baseline dialogue systems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach for enhancing dialogue systems by leveraging structured knowledge from knowledge graphs. The key strength is the ability to ground the conversation in relevant facts, which helps to address information gaps and provide more informative responses.

However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Knowledge Graph Coverage: The performance of the system is dependent on the completeness and quality of the underlying knowledge graph. Improving the coverage and accuracy of these knowledge resources is an important area for future work.
  2. Multi-hop Reasoning Complexity: The knowledge graph reasoning techniques used, such as multi-hop reasoning, can be computationally expensive and may not scale well to large, complex knowledge graphs.
  3. Dialogue Context Understanding: The paper focuses on using knowledge graphs to enrich the dialogue, but further advances may be needed in understanding the broader context and pragmatics of human conversations.

Additionally, while the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach, it would be valuable to see further analysis on the types of information gaps that are most successfully bridged, as well as any limitations or failure cases that may arise.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in combining knowledge graphs and large language models to build more intelligent and informative dialogue systems.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel approach for enhancing dialogue systems by grounding the conversation in relevant factual knowledge from knowledge graphs. The key insight is that by retrieving and incorporating appropriate facts into the dialogue, the system can better address information gaps and provide more informative and coherent responses.

The proposed architecture, which includes components for tracking the dialogue state, reasoning over a knowledge graph, and generating appropriate responses, demonstrates promising results on several dialogue benchmarks. While there are still challenges to address, such as improving knowledge graph coverage and scaling the reasoning techniques, this research represents an important step towards more intelligent and engaging conversational AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Bridging Information Gaps in Dialogues With Grounded Exchanges Using Knowledge Graphs
Total Score

0

Bridging Information Gaps in Dialogues With Grounded Exchanges Using Knowledge Graphs

Phillip Schneider, Nektarios Machner, Kristiina Jokinen, Florian Matthes

Knowledge models are fundamental to dialogue systems for enabling conversational interactions, which require handling domain-specific knowledge. Ensuring effective communication in information-providing conversations entails aligning user understanding with the knowledge available to the system. However, dialogue systems often face challenges arising from semantic inconsistencies in how information is expressed in natural language compared to how it is represented within the system's internal knowledge. To address this problem, we study the potential of large language models for conversational grounding, a mechanism to bridge information gaps by establishing shared knowledge between dialogue participants. Our approach involves annotating human conversations across five knowledge domains to create a new dialogue corpus called BridgeKG. Through a series of experiments on this dataset, we empirically evaluate the capabilities of large language models in classifying grounding acts and identifying grounded information items within a knowledge graph structure. Our findings offer insights into how these models use in-context learning for conversational grounding tasks and common prediction errors, which we illustrate with examples from challenging dialogues. We discuss how the models handle knowledge graphs as a semantic layer between unstructured dialogue utterances and structured information items.

Read more

8/13/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Towards Harnessing Large Language Models for Comprehension of Conversational Grounding

Kristiina Jokinen, Phillip Schneider, Taiga Mori

Conversational grounding is a collaborative mechanism for establishing mutual knowledge among participants engaged in a dialogue. This experimental study analyzes information-seeking conversations to investigate the capabilities of large language models in classifying dialogue turns related to explicit or implicit grounding and predicting grounded knowledge elements. Our experimental results reveal challenges encountered by large language models in the two tasks and discuss ongoing research efforts to enhance large language model-based conversational grounding comprehension through pipeline architectures and knowledge bases. These initiatives aim to develop more effective dialogue systems that are better equipped to handle the intricacies of grounded knowledge in conversations.

Read more

6/5/2024

⚙️

Total Score

0

Building Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Systems with Graph-Based Semantic Modeling

Yizhe Yang, Heyan Huang, Yang Gao, Jiawei Li and

The knowledge-grounded dialogue task aims to generate responses that convey information from given knowledge documents. However, it is a challenge for the current sequence-based model to acquire knowledge from complex documents and integrate it to perform correct responses without the aid of an explicit semantic structure. To address these issues, we propose a novel graph structure, Grounded Graph ($G^2$), that models the semantic structure of both dialogue and knowledge to facilitate knowledge selection and integration for knowledge-grounded dialogue generation. We also propose a Grounded Graph Aware Transformer ($G^2AT$) model that fuses multi-forms knowledge (both sequential and graphic) to enhance knowledge-grounded response generation. Our experiments results show that our proposed model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art methods with more than 10% gains in response generation and nearly 20% improvement in factual consistency. Further, our model reveals good generalization ability and robustness. By incorporating semantic structures as prior knowledge in deep neural networks, our model provides an effective way to aid language generation.

Read more

5/17/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Combining Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models

Amanda Kau, Xuzeng He, Aishwarya Nambissan, Aland Astudillo, Hui Yin, Amir Aryani

In recent years, Natural Language Processing (NLP) has played a significant role in various Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications such as chatbots, text generation, and language translation. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has greatly improved the performance of these applications, showing astonishing results in language understanding and generation. However, they still show some disadvantages, such as hallucinations and lack of domain-specific knowledge, that affect their performance in real-world tasks. These issues can be effectively mitigated by incorporating knowledge graphs (KGs), which organise information in structured formats that capture relationships between entities in a versatile and interpretable fashion. Likewise, the construction and validation of KGs present challenges that LLMs can help resolve. The complementary relationship between LLMs and KGs has led to a trend that combines these technologies to achieve trustworthy results. This work collected 28 papers outlining methods for KG-powered LLMs, LLM-based KGs, and LLM-KG hybrid approaches. We systematically analysed and compared these approaches to provide a comprehensive overview highlighting key trends, innovative techniques, and common challenges. This synthesis will benefit researchers new to the field and those seeking to deepen their understanding of how KGs and LLMs can be effectively combined to enhance AI applications capabilities.

Read more

7/10/2024