Budget Recycling Differential Privacy

Read original: arXiv:2403.11445 - Published 4/4/2024 by Bo Jiang, Jian Du, Sagar Shamar, Qiang Yan
Total Score

0

Budget Recycling Differential Privacy

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new technique called "Budget Recycling Differential Privacy" that aims to improve the privacy-utility tradeoff in differential privacy.
  • Differential privacy is a rigorous mathematical framework for protecting the privacy of individuals in datasets while still allowing useful analysis.
  • The key idea of budget recycling is to intelligently reuse the privacy "budget" consumed by previous queries to improve the utility of subsequent queries.

Plain English Explanation

Differential privacy is a way to analyze data while protecting the privacy of the individuals in that data. Imagine you have a dataset with information about people, like their ages, incomes, and purchases. If you want to study patterns in this data, you need to balance two goals: extracting useful insights while also keeping the private details of each person secret.

Differential privacy provides a mathematical approach to do this. It works by adding a small amount of random "noise" to the data, which hides the details of any single individual. The more noise you add, the better the privacy protection, but the less useful the data analysis becomes.

This paper introduces a new technique called "budget recycling" that aims to improve this privacy-utility tradeoff. The key idea is to be smarter about how the privacy "budget" is used. Typically, each data analysis consumes some of the privacy budget, and once it's used up, no more analyses can be performed.

Budget recycling allows the system to intelligently reuse portions of the privacy budget that were not fully consumed by previous analyses. This means the same privacy budget can support more useful data analyses, leading to better insights without compromising individual privacy.

Technical Explanation

The paper first provides background on differential privacy and existing techniques for managing the privacy budget, such as the Gaussian mechanism and the Rényi differential privacy (RDP) accountant.

The core contribution is the "Budget Recycling Differential Privacy" (BRDP) framework. BRDP is built on top of the RDP accountant and allows the privacy budget to be dynamically managed and partially recycled for subsequent queries. Specifically, BRDP tracks the actual privacy loss incurred by each query, rather than just the worst-case bound. This enables unused portions of the budget to be carried forward and combined with the budget for future queries.

The paper demonstrates the advantages of BRDP through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation on several real-world datasets. The results show that BRDP can significantly improve the privacy-utility tradeoff compared to standard differential privacy techniques, allowing for more accurate data analysis while still providing strong privacy guarantees.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough technical description of the BRDP framework and convincingly demonstrates its benefits through rigorous experiments. However, a few potential limitations are worth noting:

  1. The analysis assumes the data curator has complete knowledge of the query workload in advance, which may not always be the case in practice. Handling ad-hoc queries and evolving workloads could be an area for future research.

  2. The current implementation of BRDP relies on the Gaussian mechanism, which may not be the most efficient choice for all types of queries. Exploring the integration of BRDP with other privacy-preserving mechanisms could be valuable.

  3. While the paper discusses the theoretical properties of BRDP, a deeper analysis of its privacy guarantees and the conditions under which the claimed utility improvements hold would strengthen the overall contribution.

Nevertheless, the Budget Recycling Differential Privacy framework represents an important advancement in the field of differential privacy, with the potential to enable more effective data analysis while preserving individual privacy.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel technique called Budget Recycling Differential Privacy (BRDP) that aims to improve the privacy-utility tradeoff in differential privacy. By intelligently managing and partially recycling the privacy budget, BRDP can support more accurate data analysis without compromising individual privacy.

The theoretical analysis and empirical results presented in the paper demonstrate the advantages of BRDP over standard differential privacy techniques. This work represents a significant contribution to the field, as it provides a practical approach to enhancing the utility of differentially private data analysis while maintaining strong privacy guarantees.

As data-driven decision-making becomes increasingly important, techniques like BRDP will be crucial for unlocking the full potential of sensitive datasets while respecting the privacy of the individuals they represent.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Budget Recycling Differential Privacy
Total Score

0

Budget Recycling Differential Privacy

Bo Jiang, Jian Du, Sagar Shamar, Qiang Yan

Differential Privacy (DP) mechanisms usually {force} reduction in data utility by producing out-of-bound noisy results for a tight privacy budget. We introduce the Budget Recycling Differential Privacy (BR-DP) framework, designed to provide soft-bounded noisy outputs for a broad range of existing DP mechanisms. By soft-bounded, we refer to the mechanism's ability to release most outputs within a predefined error boundary, thereby improving utility and maintaining privacy simultaneously. The core of BR-DP consists of two components: a DP kernel responsible for generating a noisy answer per iteration, and a recycler that probabilistically recycles/regenerates or releases the noisy answer. We delve into the privacy accounting of BR-DP, culminating in the development of a budgeting principle that optimally sub-allocates the available budget between the DP kernel and the recycler. Furthermore, we introduce algorithms for tight BR-DP accounting in composition scenarios, and our findings indicate that BR-DP achieves reduced privacy leakage post-composition compared to DP. Additionally, we explore the concept of privacy amplification via subsampling within the BR-DP framework and propose optimal sampling rates for BR-DP across various queries. We experiment with real data, and the results demonstrate BR-DP's effectiveness in lifting the utility-privacy tradeoff provided by DP mechanisms.

Read more

4/4/2024

Enhancing Scalability of Metric Differential Privacy via Secret Dataset Partitioning and Benders Decomposition
Total Score

0

Enhancing Scalability of Metric Differential Privacy via Secret Dataset Partitioning and Benders Decomposition

Chenxi Qiu

Metric Differential Privacy (mDP) extends the concept of Differential Privacy (DP) to serve as a new paradigm of data perturbation. It is designed to protect secret data represented in general metric space, such as text data encoded as word embeddings or geo-location data on the road network or grid maps. To derive an optimal data perturbation mechanism under mDP, a widely used method is linear programming (LP), which, however, might suffer from a polynomial explosion of decision variables, rendering it impractical in large-scale mDP. In this paper, our objective is to develop a new computation framework to enhance the scalability of the LP-based mDP. Considering the connections established by the mDP constraints among the secret records, we partition the original secret dataset into various subsets. Building upon the partition, we reformulate the LP problem for mDP and solve it via Benders Decomposition, which is composed of two stages: (1) a master program to manage the perturbation calculation across subsets and (2) a set of subproblems, each managing the perturbation derivation within a subset. Our experimental results on multiple datasets, including geo-location data in the road network/grid maps, text data, and synthetic data, underscore our proposed mechanism's superior scalability and efficiency.

Read more

5/10/2024

Total Score

0

What to Consider When Considering Differential Privacy for Policy

Priyanka Nanayakkara, Jessica Hullman

Differential privacy (DP) is a mathematical definition of privacy that can be widely applied when publishing data. DP has been recognized as a potential means of adhering to various privacy-related legal requirements. However, it can be difficult to reason about whether DP may be appropriate for a given context due to tensions that arise when it is brought from theory into practice. To aid policymaking around privacy concerns, we identify three categories of challenges to understanding DP along with associated questions that policymakers can ask about the potential deployment context to anticipate its impacts.

Read more

9/19/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Differential Privacy via Distributionally Robust Optimization

Aras Selvi, Huikang Liu, Wolfram Wiesemann

In recent years, differential privacy has emerged as the de facto standard for sharing statistics of datasets while limiting the disclosure of private information about the involved individuals. This is achieved by randomly perturbing the statistics to be published, which in turn leads to a privacy-accuracy trade-off: larger perturbations provide stronger privacy guarantees, but they result in less accurate statistics that offer lower utility to the recipients. Of particular interest are therefore optimal mechanisms that provide the highest accuracy for a pre-selected level of privacy. To date, work in this area has focused on specifying families of perturbations a priori and subsequently proving their asymptotic and/or best-in-class optimality. In this paper, we develop a class of mechanisms that enjoy non-asymptotic and unconditional optimality guarantees. To this end, we formulate the mechanism design problem as an infinite-dimensional distributionally robust optimization problem. We show that the problem affords a strong dual, and we exploit this duality to develop converging hierarchies of finite-dimensional upper and lower bounding problems. Our upper (primal) bounds correspond to implementable perturbations whose suboptimality can be bounded by our lower (dual) bounds. Both bounding problems can be solved within seconds via cutting plane techniques that exploit the inherent problem structure. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that our perturbations can outperform the previously best results from the literature on artificial as well as standard benchmark problems.

Read more

5/24/2024