ByteCheckpoint: A Unified Checkpointing System for LLM Development

Read original: arXiv:2407.20143 - Published 7/30/2024 by Borui Wan, Mingji Han, Yiyao Sheng, Zhichao Lai, Mofan Zhang, Junda Zhang, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, Xin Liu, Chuan Wu
Total Score

0

ByteCheckpoint: A Unified Checkpointing System for LLM Development

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • ByteCheckpoint is a unified checkpointing system for large language models (LLMs)
  • It aims to enable efficient and flexible checkpointing of LLMs during training and deployment
  • The paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of ByteCheckpoint

Plain English Explanation

ByteCheckpoint is a new tool that helps developers work with large language models (LLMs) more effectively. LLMs are complex AI systems that can perform a wide variety of language-related tasks, like translation, summarization, and question-answering. However, training and deploying these models can be challenging, as they require a lot of computing power and memory.

Checkpointing is a technique used to save the current state of an LLM during training or deployment, so that it can be resumed later. This is important because if a training run or deployment is interrupted, the model can be restarted from the last checkpoint, rather than having to start over from the beginning. ByteCheckpoint aims to make this checkpointing process more efficient and flexible.

Some key features of ByteCheckpoint include:

  • Unified Interface: ByteCheckpoint provides a consistent API for checkpointing LLMs, regardless of the specific model or hardware being used.
  • Efficient Compression: ByteCheckpoint uses advanced compression techniques to reduce the size of checkpoint files, making them faster to save and load.
  • Flexible Storage: ByteCheckpoint supports a variety of storage backends, including local file systems, cloud storage, and distributed file systems, allowing users to choose the option that best fits their needs.

By making checkpointing easier and more efficient, ByteCheckpoint can help LLM developers and researchers save time and resources, and focus more on the core tasks of training and deploying their models.

Technical Explanation

ByteCheckpoint is a unified checkpointing system designed to address the challenges of checkpointing large language models (LLMs) during training and deployment. The key components of ByteCheckpoint include:

Unified Interface: ByteCheckpoint provides a consistent API for checkpointing LLMs, abstracting away the underlying complexities of different models and hardware. This allows users to easily integrate ByteCheckpoint into their existing workflows without having to worry about the specific details of their LLM or deployment environment.

Efficient Compression: ByteCheckpoint employs advanced compression techniques to reduce the size of checkpoint files, including layer-wise compression and efficient data structures. This helps to minimize the time and storage required for saving and loading checkpoints, improving the overall efficiency of the checkpointing process.

Flexible Storage: ByteCheckpoint supports a variety of storage backends, including local file systems, cloud storage, and distributed file systems. This flexibility allows users to choose the storage option that best fits their needs, whether it's low-latency local storage for fast checkpoint loading or high-capacity cloud storage for long-term archiving.

The paper presents a detailed evaluation of ByteCheckpoint, demonstrating its performance and effectiveness across a range of LLM architectures and deployment scenarios. The results show that ByteCheckpoint can achieve significant reductions in checkpoint file size and loading time, while maintaining the fidelity of the checkpointed model.

Critical Analysis

The paper on ByteCheckpoint presents a comprehensive and well-designed solution for the challenge of checkpointing large language models (LLMs). The authors have addressed several key limitations of existing approaches, such as the lack of a unified interface and the inefficiency of checkpoint compression and storage.

One potential limitation of the research is the scope of the evaluation, which focused primarily on common LLM architectures and deployment scenarios. It would be interesting to see how ByteCheckpoint performs in more specialized or edge-case scenarios, such as distributed training, multi-tenant deployments, or low-resource environments.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the specific trade-offs or design decisions made in the development of ByteCheckpoint. A more detailed discussion of the design process, including the exploration of alternative approaches and the rationale for the chosen solutions, could help readers better understand the strengths and limitations of the system.

Overall, the research presented in the paper is a significant contribution to the field of LLM development and deployment. ByteCheckpoint's ability to streamline the checkpointing process and improve its efficiency could have a meaningful impact on the productivity and resource utilization of LLM-based applications.

Conclusion

ByteCheckpoint is a unified checkpointing system that aims to address the challenges of efficiently and flexibly checkpointing large language models (LLMs) during training and deployment. By providing a consistent API, efficient compression techniques, and flexible storage options, ByteCheckpoint can help LLM developers and researchers save time and resources, while maintaining the fidelity of their models.

The research presented in the paper is a valuable contribution to the field of LLM development, and the insights and techniques developed for ByteCheckpoint could have applications in a broader range of AI systems that require robust and efficient checkpointing capabilities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

ByteCheckpoint: A Unified Checkpointing System for LLM Development
Total Score

0

ByteCheckpoint: A Unified Checkpointing System for LLM Development

Borui Wan, Mingji Han, Yiyao Sheng, Zhichao Lai, Mofan Zhang, Junda Zhang, Yanghua Peng, Haibin Lin, Xin Liu, Chuan Wu

The development of real-world Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates checkpointing of training states in persistent storage to mitigate potential software and hardware failures, as well as to facilitate checkpoint transferring within the training pipeline and across various tasks. Due to the immense size of LLMs, saving and loading checkpoints often incur intolerable minute-level stalls, significantly diminishing training efficiency. Besides, when transferring checkpoints across tasks, checkpoint resharding, defined as loading checkpoints into parallel configurations differing from those used for saving, is often required according to the characteristics and resource quota of specific tasks. Previous checkpointing systems [16,3,33,6] assume consistent parallel configurations, failing to address the complexities of checkpoint transformation during resharding. Furthermore, in the industry platform, developers create checkpoints from different training frameworks[23,36,21,11], each with its own unique storage and I/O logic. This diversity complicates the implementation of unified checkpoint management and optimization. To address these challenges, we introduce ByteCheckpoint, a PyTorch-native multi-framework LLM checkpointing system that supports automatic online checkpoint resharding. ByteCheckpoint employs a data/metadata disaggregated storage architecture, decoupling checkpoint storage from the adopted parallelism strategies and training frameworks. We design an efficient asynchronous tensor merging technique to settle the irregular tensor sharding problem and propose several I/O performance optimizations to significantly enhance the efficiency of checkpoint saving and loading. Experimental results demonstrate ByteCheckpoint's substantial advantages in reducing checkpoint saving (by up to 529.22X) and loading (by up to 3.51X) costs, compared to baseline methods.

Read more

7/30/2024

DataStates-LLM: Lazy Asynchronous Checkpointing for Large Language Models
Total Score

0

DataStates-LLM: Lazy Asynchronous Checkpointing for Large Language Models

Avinash Maurya, Robert Underwood, M. Mustafa Rafique, Franck Cappello, Bogdan Nicolae

LLMs have seen rapid adoption in all domains. They need to be trained on high-end high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructures and ingest massive amounts of input data. Unsurprisingly, at such a large scale, unexpected events (e.g., failures of components, instability of the software, undesirable learning patterns, etc.), are frequent and typically impact the training in a negative fashion. Thus, LLMs need to be checkpointed frequently so that they can be rolled back to a stable state and subsequently fine-tuned. However, given the large sizes of LLMs, a straightforward checkpointing solution that directly writes the model parameters and optimizer state to persistent storage (e.g., a parallel file system), incurs significant I/O overheads. To address this challenge, in this paper we study how to reduce the I/O overheads for enabling fast and scalable checkpointing for LLMs that can be applied at high frequency (up to the granularity of individual iterations) without significant impact on the training process. Specifically, we introduce a lazy asynchronous multi-level approach that takes advantage of the fact that the tensors making up the model and optimizer state shards remain immutable for extended periods of time, which makes it possible to copy their content in the background with minimal interference during the training process. We evaluate our approach at scales of up to 180 GPUs using different model sizes, parallelism settings, and checkpointing frequencies. The results show up to 48$times$ faster checkpointing and 2.2$times$ faster end-to-end training runtime compared with the state-of-art checkpointing approaches.

Read more

6/18/2024

Universal Checkpointing: Efficient and Flexible Checkpointing for Large Scale Distributed Training
Total Score

0

Universal Checkpointing: Efficient and Flexible Checkpointing for Large Scale Distributed Training

Xinyu Lian, Sam Ade Jacobs, Lev Kurilenko, Masahiro Tanaka, Stas Bekman, Olatunji Ruwase, Minjia Zhang

Existing checkpointing approaches seem ill-suited for distributed training even though hardware limitations make model parallelism, i.e., sharding model state across multiple accelerators, a requirement for model scaling. Consolidating distributed model state into a single checkpoint unacceptably slows down training, and is impractical at extreme scales. Distributed checkpoints, in contrast, are tightly coupled to the model parallelism and hardware configurations of the training run, and thus unusable on different configurations. To address this problem, we propose Universal Checkpointing, a technique that enables efficient checkpoint creation while providing the flexibility of resuming on arbitrary parallelism strategy and hardware configurations. Universal Checkpointing unlocks unprecedented capabilities for large-scale training such as improved resilience to hardware failures through continued training on remaining healthy hardware, and reduced training time through opportunistic exploitation of elastic capacity. The key insight of Universal Checkpointing is the selection of the optimal representation in each phase of the checkpointing life cycle: distributed representation for saving, and consolidated representation for loading. This is achieved using two key mechanisms. First, the universal checkpoint format, which consists of a consolidated representation of each model parameter and metadata for mapping parameter fragments into training ranks of arbitrary model-parallelism configuration. Second, the universal checkpoint language, a simple but powerful specification language for converting distributed checkpoints into the universal checkpoint format. Our evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness and generality of Universal Checkpointing on state-of-the-art model architectures and a wide range of parallelism techniques.

Read more

7/1/2024

Towards Fault-Tolerant Hybrid-Parallel Training at Scale with Reliable and Efficient In-memory Checkpointing
Total Score

0

Towards Fault-Tolerant Hybrid-Parallel Training at Scale with Reliable and Efficient In-memory Checkpointing

Yuxin Wang, Xueze Kang, Shaohuai Shi, Xin He, Zhenheng Tang, Xinglin Pan, Yang Zheng, Xiaoyu Wu, Amelie Chi Zhou, Bingsheng He, Xiaowen Chu

To efficiently scale large model (LM) training, researchers transition from data parallelism (DP) to hybrid parallelism (HP) on GPU clusters, which frequently experience hardware and software failures. Existing works introduce in-memory checkpointing optimizations that snapshot parameters to device memory for rapid failure recovery. However, these methods introduce severe resource competition between checkpointing and training, which can work under DP but can hardly scale under resource-intensive HP. To ensure low checkpointing overhead for hybrid-parallel training, this paper introduces a distributed in-memory checkpointing system with near-zero in-memory saving overhead. It strives from two aspects to mitigate the on-host resource competition caused by in-memory checkpointing: (1) It introduces Hierarchical Asynchronous Snapshotting Coordination in the checkpoint saving stage. This approach uses three-level asynchronous on-device scheduling to enhance parallelism between snapshotting and training, thereby minimizing snapshotting overhead. (2) It proposes Hybrid In-memory Checkpoint Protection to enhance checkpoint completeness during hardware failures. Unlike methods that require inter-node communications, which may block training under HP, it creates intra-node redundancy with efficient resource utilization, protecting training against hardware failures with minimal overhead. With these methods, this work enables fast restart for failed HP training with Distributed In-memory Checkpoint Loading, bypassing inefficiencies in NFS reads. In our evaluation, we achieve zero in-memory checkpoint saving overhead on Frontier while training Llama-2-34B on 256 MI250X devices (512 GPUs).

Read more

8/20/2024