Calibrated Regression Against An Adversary Without Regret
2302.12196
0
0
↗️
Abstract
We are interested in probabilistic prediction in online settings in which data does not follow a probability distribution. Our work seeks to achieve two goals: (1) producing valid probabilities that accurately reflect model confidence; and (2) ensuring that traditional notions of performance (e.g., high accuracy) still hold. We introduce online algorithms guaranteed to achieve these goals on arbitrary streams of data points, including data chosen by an adversary. Specifically, our algorithms produce forecasts that are (1) calibrated -- i.e., an 80% confidence interval contains the true outcome 80% of the time -- and (2) have low regret relative to a user-specified baseline model. We implement a post-hoc recalibration strategy that provably achieves these goals in regression; previous algorithms applied to classification or achieved (1) but not (2). In the context of Bayesian optimization, an online model-based decision-making task in which the data distribution shifts over time, our method yields accelerated convergence to improved optima.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores probabilistic prediction in online settings where data does not follow a probability distribution.
- The researchers aim to produce valid probabilities that accurately reflect model confidence, while also maintaining high accuracy.
- They introduce online algorithms that guarantee these goals on arbitrary data streams, including those chosen by an adversary.
- Their methods yield calibrated forecasts and low regret relative to a baseline model.
- In the context of Bayesian optimization, their approach leads to accelerated convergence to improved optima.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers are looking at a type of prediction problem where the data does not follow a predictable pattern. Their goal is to create models that can make reliable probability estimates about their predictions, while still maintaining high accuracy.
To do this, they've developed new algorithms that can work with any kind of data, even if it's deliberately chosen to be unpredictable. These algorithms produce forecasts that are "calibrated" - for example, if the model says there's an 80% chance of a certain outcome, that outcome will actually occur 80% of the time. The algorithms also have "low regret," meaning they don't perform much worse than a baseline model that the user specifies.
The researchers tested their methods in the context of Bayesian optimization, which is a way of using models to make decisions and find optimal solutions. In this setting, the data distribution can change over time. The researchers found that their calibrated, low-regret forecasts helped the optimization process converge to better solutions faster.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces online algorithms that tackle the challenge of producing valid probability estimates and maintaining high performance, even when the data does not follow a known probability distribution. These algorithms leverage a post-hoc recalibration strategy to ensure the forecasts are (1) calibrated - i.e., an 80% confidence interval contains the true outcome 80% of the time - and (2) have low regret relative to a user-specified baseline model.
Previous work in online classification predictions and uncertainty calibration under adversarial attacks has addressed parts of this problem, but the algorithms in this paper are the first to achieve both calibration and low regret guarantees simultaneously.
The researchers evaluate their methods in the context of Bayesian optimization, an online decision-making task where the data distribution shifts over time. They find that the calibrated, low-regret forecasts produced by their algorithms accelerate convergence to improved optima compared to standard Bayesian optimization approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of developing probabilistic prediction methods that work in online settings with arbitrary data distributions. The proposed algorithms appear to be a significant advance over previous work, as they are the first to simultaneously achieve calibrated probabilities and low regret.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations or avenues for further research. For example, the algorithms rely on a user-specified baseline model, which may not always be available in practice. It would be interesting to see how the methods perform when this baseline is not provided or is itself poorly calibrated.
Additionally, the paper focuses on regression tasks, but many real-world prediction problems involve classification or other output spaces. Extending the methods to these settings could broaden their applicability.
Finally, the paper does not consider the computational complexity of the proposed algorithms, which may be an important factor in their practical deployment, especially in online settings with dynamic environments.
Overall, the work represents an important step forward in the field of probabilistic prediction and highlights the need for further research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper introduces novel online algorithms that can produce calibrated probability estimates with low regret, even when the data does not follow a known distribution. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their methods in the context of Bayesian optimization, where the calibrated forecasts accelerate convergence to improved solutions.
The work advances the state of the art in probabilistic prediction and decision-making under uncertainty, which has important implications for a wide range of applications, from forecasting to reinforcement learning. While the paper identifies some promising directions, further research is needed to fully address the challenges of reliable probabilistic prediction in complex, dynamic environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔮
Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
0
0
Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.
6/27/2024
🎲
Posterior Probability Matters: Doubly-Adaptive Calibration for Neural Predictions in Online Advertising
Penghui Wei, Weimin Zhang, Ruijie Hou, Jinquan Liu, Shaoguo Liu, Liang Wang, Bo Zheng
0
0
Predicting user response probabilities is vital for ad ranking and bidding. We hope that predictive models can produce accurate probabilistic predictions that reflect true likelihoods. Calibration techniques aim to post-process model predictions to posterior probabilities. Field-level calibration -- which performs calibration w.r.t. to a specific field value -- is fine-grained and more practical. In this paper we propose a doubly-adaptive approach AdaCalib. It learns an isotonic function family to calibrate model predictions with the guidance of posterior statistics, and field-adaptive mechanisms are designed to ensure that the posterior is appropriate for the field value to be calibrated. Experiments verify that AdaCalib achieves significant improvement on calibration performance. It has been deployed online and beats previous approach.
5/28/2024
🏷️
Online Classification with Predictions
Vinod Raman, Ambuj Tewari
0
0
We study online classification when the learner has access to predictions about future examples. We design an online learner whose expected regret is never worse than the worst-case regret, gracefully improves with the quality of the predictions, and can be significantly better than the worst-case regret when the predictions of future examples are accurate. As a corollary, we show that if the learner is always guaranteed to observe data where future examples are easily predictable, then online learning can be as easy as transductive online learning. Our results complement recent work in online algorithms with predictions and smoothed online classification, which go beyond a worse-case analysis by using machine-learned predictions and distributional assumptions respectively.
5/24/2024
🔎
Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks
Cornelius Emde, Francesco Pinto, Thomas Lukasiewicz, Philip H. S. Torr, Adel Bibi
0
0
Since neural classifiers are known to be sensitive to adversarial perturbations that alter their accuracy, textit{certification methods} have been developed to provide provable guarantees on the insensitivity of their predictions to such perturbations. Furthermore, in safety-critical applications, the frequentist interpretation of the confidence of a classifier (also known as model calibration) can be of utmost importance. This property can be measured via the Brier score or the expected calibration error. We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration as worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations. Specifically, we produce analytic bounds for the Brier score and approximate bounds via the solution of a mixed-integer program on the expected calibration error. Finally, we propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through textit{adversarial calibration training}.
5/24/2024