On Calibration of Object Detectors: Pitfalls, Evaluation and Baselines

Overview

• The paper discusses the crucial problem of calibrating object detectors to ensure reliable usage.
• It highlights the limitations of recent approaches, including designing new loss functions and post-hoc Temperature Scaling (TS).
• The paper proposes a principled evaluation framework to jointly measure calibration and accuracy of object detectors.
• It also introduces efficient and easy-to-use post-hoc calibration approaches, such as Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression, specifically for object detection tasks.
• Contrary to common belief, the paper shows that post-hoc calibrators are more powerful and effective than recent train-time calibration methods.

Plain English Explanation

Object detectors are computer vision models that can identify and locate objects in images or videos. However, for these detectors to be reliable, they need to be properly calibrated, which means their output probabilities should accurately reflect the true likelihood of an object being present.

Recent approaches to this problem have focused on two main strategies: (1) designing new loss functions to train object detectors from scratch to be well-calibrated, and (2) using a technique called Temperature Scaling (TS) to adjust the output probabilities of a trained detector to make them more calibrated.

These approaches are then evaluated using a combination of metrics, such as Detection Expected Calibration Error (D-ECE) and Average Precision.

However, the paper argues that these recent evaluation frameworks, metrics, and the use of TS have notable drawbacks, leading to incorrect conclusions about the effectiveness of these calibration methods.

To address these issues, the paper proposes a new, more principled evaluation framework that can jointly measure the calibration and accuracy of object detectors. It also introduces efficient and easy-to-use post-hoc calibration approaches, such as Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression, specifically tailored for object detection tasks.

Surprisingly, the paper finds that these post-hoc calibrators, which are cheap to implement and use, are actually more powerful and effective than the recent train-time calibration methods, contrary to common belief. For example, the paper shows that a detector calibrated using Isotonic Regression outperforms a state-of-the-art train-time calibration method by a significant margin on the COCO dataset.

Additionally, the paper proposes improved versions of the recently proposed Localization-aware ECE metric, which takes into account the localization accuracy of object detectors when evaluating their calibration.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by highlighting the importance of calibrating object detectors to ensure reliable usage. It then reviews two main approaches from recent literature: (1) designing new loss functions to train calibrated detectors from scratch, and (2) using post-hoc Temperature Scaling (TS) to scale the output probabilities of a trained detector.

The paper argues that these recent evaluation frameworks, metrics (such as D-ECE), and the use of TS have notable drawbacks, leading to incorrect conclusions about the effectiveness of these calibration methods. For example, the paper shows that TS can sometimes worsen the calibration of object detectors.

To address these issues, the paper proposes a new, principled evaluation framework that can jointly measure the calibration and accuracy of object detectors. This framework uses a combination of metrics, including a tailored version of Expected Calibration Error (ECE) that takes into account the localization accuracy of detectors.

The paper then introduces efficient and easy-to-use post-hoc calibration approaches, such as Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression, specifically designed for object detection tasks. These methods learn to scale the output probabilities of a trained detector to make them more calibrated.

Contrary to the common belief that train-time calibration methods are superior, the paper's extensive experiments show that these post-hoc calibrators are much more powerful and effective than the recent train-time calibration methods. For example, the paper demonstrates that a detector calibrated using Isotonic Regression outperforms the state-of-the-art train-time calibration method Cal-DETR by more than 7 D-ECE on the COCO dataset.

Additionally, the paper proposes improved versions of the recently proposed Localization-aware ECE metric, which takes into account the localization accuracy of object detectors when evaluating their calibration.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and insightful analysis of the current state of object detector calibration research. While the proposed solutions are technically sound, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered:

1. The paper's evaluation is primarily focused on the COCO dataset, which may not fully capture the diversity of real-world object detection scenarios. It would be valuable to extend the analysis to other datasets and application domains to assess the generalizability of the findings.

2. The paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison of the computational and memory overhead of the various calibration methods. This information could be useful for practitioners who need to deploy calibrated object detectors in resource-constrained environments.

3. The paper discusses the limitations of current evaluation metrics, such as D-ECE, but does not propose a completely novel metric. Further research could explore developing more robust and comprehensive evaluation frameworks for object detector calibration.

4. The paper's focus is on post-hoc calibration methods, but there may still be value in exploring train-time calibration approaches, especially if they can be combined with the proposed post-hoc techniques for even better performance.

Overall, the paper presents a significant contribution to the field of object detector calibration, challenging the current state-of-the-art and proposing practical solutions. However, as with any research, there is always room for further exploration and refinement to address the remaining challenges.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the crucial problem of calibrating object detectors to ensure their reliable usage. It highlights the limitations of recent approaches, including designing new loss functions and post-hoc Temperature Scaling, and proposes a more principled evaluation framework to jointly measure the calibration and accuracy of object detectors.

The paper introduces efficient and easy-to-use post-hoc calibration approaches, such as Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression, specifically tailored for object detection tasks. Contrary to common belief, the paper's extensive experiments show that these post-hoc calibrators are much more powerful and effective than the recent train-time calibration methods.

This work represents a significant step forward in the field of object detector calibration, providing valuable insights and practical solutions that can help improve the reliability and trustworthiness of computer vision systems in real-world applications.