Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness
2404.13016
0
0
Abstract
Model calibration aims to align confidence with prediction correctness. The Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class. However, we find the CE loss has intrinsic limitations. For example, for a narrow misclassification, a calibrator trained by the CE loss often produces high confidence on the wrongly predicted class (e.g., a test sample is wrongly classified and its softmax score on the ground truth class is around 0.4), which is undesirable. In this paper, we propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration. Intuitively, the proposed objective function asks that the calibrator decrease model confidence on wrongly predicted samples and increase confidence on correctly predicted samples. Because a sample itself has insufficient ability to indicate correctness, we use its transformed versions (e.g., rotated, greyscaled and color-jittered) during calibrator training. Trained on an in-distribution validation set and tested with isolated, individual test samples, our method achieves competitive calibration performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets compared with the state of the art. Further, our analysis points out the difference between our method and commonly used objectives such as CE loss and mean square error loss, where the latters sometimes deviates from the calibration aim.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to model calibration, which aims to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of machine learning models.
- The researchers propose a technique called "Gaining Prediction Correctness Awareness" (GPCA) that helps models better understand their own prediction accuracy and uncertainty.
- The GPCA method is evaluated on two popular image classification benchmarks, ImageNet and CIFAR-10, and is shown to outperform existing calibration techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a way to make machine learning models more reliable and trustworthy. Machine learning models are often used to make important decisions, but they can sometimes be overconfident or biased in their predictions. The researchers in this paper introduce a new technique called "Gaining Prediction Correctness Awareness" (GPCA) that helps models better understand how accurate their predictions are and how uncertain they should be.
The key idea behind GPCA is to train the model to not just make predictions, but also to assess how likely those predictions are to be correct. This allows the model to be more transparent about its uncertainty and to avoid being overconfident in cases where it is likely to be wrong.
The researchers tested this GPCA approach on two widely-used image classification benchmarks, ImageNet and CIFAR-10. They found that models trained with GPCA outperformed existing calibration techniques, meaning they were better able to accurately assess the reliability of their own predictions.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards making machine learning models more trustworthy and transparent, which is crucial as they become increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making processes.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach to model calibration called "Gaining Prediction Correctness Awareness" (GPCA). The key idea behind GPCA is to train the model to not just make predictions, but also to assess the likelihood that those predictions are correct.
To evaluate the GPCA approach, the researchers conducted experiments on two popular image classification datasets: ImageNet and CIFAR-10. For the ImageNet experiments, they used a ResNet-50 model, while for CIFAR-10 they used a ResNet-18 model.
The GPCA technique works by adding an additional "calibration" output to the model, which predicts the likelihood that the model's main prediction is correct. This calibration output is trained alongside the main prediction task, encouraging the model to develop a more accurate understanding of its own uncertainty.
The researchers compared the performance of models trained with GPCA to those trained with standard calibration techniques, such as temperature scaling and Platt scaling. They found that the GPCA-trained models consistently outperformed the baseline models in terms of calibration metrics, indicating that they were better able to accurately assess the reliability of their own predictions.
Critical Analysis
The GPCA approach presented in this paper represents an important advancement in the field of model calibration, but it is not without its limitations. One potential concern is the additional computational and training overhead required to learn the calibration output, which could make the GPCA approach less practical for certain real-world applications with strict resource constraints.
Furthermore, the paper only evaluates the GPCA technique on image classification tasks, and it is unclear how well it would generalize to other problem domains, such as natural language processing or reinforcement learning. Additional research would be needed to assess the broader applicability of the GPCA approach.
It is also worth noting that the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the underlying factors that contribute to the improved calibration performance of GPCA-trained models. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms driving these gains could help inform the development of even more effective calibration techniques in the future.
Despite these limitations, the GPCA approach represents an important step towards building more trustworthy and transparent machine learning models, which is a crucial goal as these technologies become increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making processes. Continued research in this area, along with a critical examination of the limitations and potential pitfalls, will be essential for realizing the full benefits of this technology.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel approach to model calibration called "Gaining Prediction Correctness Awareness" (GPCA), which aims to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of machine learning models. By training models to not just make predictions, but also assess the likelihood that those predictions are correct, the GPCA technique helps models develop a more accurate understanding of their own uncertainty.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of the GPCA approach through experiments on two widely-used image classification benchmarks, ImageNet and CIFAR-10, where GPCA-trained models outperformed existing calibration techniques.
This research represents an important step towards building more trustworthy and transparent machine learning systems, which is crucial as these technologies become increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making processes. Continued advancements in this area, along with a critical examination of the limitations and potential pitfalls, will be essential for realizing the full benefits of this technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
On Calibration of Object Detectors: Pitfalls, Evaluation and Baselines
Selim Kuzucu, Kemal Oksuz, Jonathan Sadeghi, Puneet K. Dokania
0
0
Reliable usage of object detectors require them to be calibrated -- a crucial problem that requires careful attention. Recent approaches towards this involve (1) designing new loss functions to obtain calibrated detectors by training them from scratch, and (2) post-hoc Temperature Scaling (TS) that learns to scale the likelihood of a trained detector to output calibrated predictions. These approaches are then evaluated based on a combination of Detection Expected Calibration Error (D-ECE) and Average Precision. In this work, via extensive analysis and insights, we highlight that these recent evaluation frameworks, evaluation metrics, and the use of TS have notable drawbacks leading to incorrect conclusions. As a step towards fixing these issues, we propose a principled evaluation framework to jointly measure calibration and accuracy of object detectors. We also tailor efficient and easy-to-use post-hoc calibration approaches such as Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression specifically for object detection task. Contrary to the common notion, our experiments show that once designed and evaluated properly, post-hoc calibrators, which are extremely cheap to build and use, are much more powerful and effective than the recent train-time calibration methods. To illustrate, D-DETR with our post-hoc Isotonic Regression calibrator outperforms the recent train-time state-of-the-art calibration method Cal-DETR by more than 7 D-ECE on the COCO dataset. Additionally, we propose improved versions of the recently proposed Localization-aware ECE and show the efficacy of our method on these metrics as well. Code is available at: https://github.com/fiveai/detection_calibration.
6/3/2024
🧠
On Measuring Calibration of Discrete Probabilistic Neural Networks
Spencer Young, Porter Jenkins
0
0
As machine learning systems become increasingly integrated into real-world applications, accurately representing uncertainty is crucial for enhancing their safety, robustness, and reliability. Training neural networks to fit high-dimensional probability distributions via maximum likelihood has become an effective method for uncertainty quantification. However, such models often exhibit poor calibration, leading to overconfident predictions. Traditional metrics like Expected Calibration Error (ECE) and Negative Log Likelihood (NLL) have limitations, including biases and parametric assumptions. This paper proposes a new approach using conditional kernel mean embeddings to measure calibration discrepancies without these biases and assumptions. Preliminary experiments on synthetic data demonstrate the method's potential, with future work planned for more complex applications.
5/22/2024
🔮
Online Calibrated and Conformal Prediction Improves Bayesian Optimization
Shachi Deshpande, Charles Marx, Volodymyr Kuleshov
0
0
Accurate uncertainty estimates are important in sequential model-based decision-making tasks such as Bayesian optimization. However, these estimates can be imperfect if the data violates assumptions made by the model (e.g., Gaussianity). This paper studies which uncertainties are needed in model-based decision-making and in Bayesian optimization, and argues that uncertainties can benefit from calibration -- i.e., an 80% predictive interval should contain the true outcome 80% of the time. Maintaining calibration, however, can be challenging when the data is non-stationary and depends on our actions. We propose using simple algorithms based on online learning to provably maintain calibration on non-i.i.d. data, and we show how to integrate these algorithms in Bayesian optimization with minimal overhead. Empirically, we find that calibrated Bayesian optimization converges to better optima in fewer steps, and we demonstrate improved performance on standard benchmark functions and hyperparameter optimization tasks.
6/27/2024
🛸
On Computationally Efficient Multi-Class Calibration
Parikshit Gopalan, Lunjia Hu, Guy N. Rothblum
0
0
Consider a multi-class labelling problem, where the labels can take values in $[k]$, and a predictor predicts a distribution over the labels. In this work, we study the following foundational question: Are there notions of multi-class calibration that give strong guarantees of meaningful predictions and can be achieved in time and sample complexities polynomial in $k$? Prior notions of calibration exhibit a tradeoff between computational efficiency and expressivity: they either suffer from having sample complexity exponential in $k$, or needing to solve computationally intractable problems, or give rather weak guarantees. Our main contribution is a notion of calibration that achieves all these desiderata: we formulate a robust notion of projected smooth calibration for multi-class predictions, and give new recalibration algorithms for efficiently calibrating predictors under this definition with complexity polynomial in $k$. Projected smooth calibration gives strong guarantees for all downstream decision makers who want to use the predictor for binary classification problems of the form: does the label belong to a subset $T subseteq [k]$: e.g. is this an image of an animal? It ensures that the probabilities predicted by summing the probabilities assigned to labels in $T$ are close to some perfectly calibrated binary predictor for that task. We also show that natural strengthenings of our definition are computationally hard to achieve: they run into information theoretic barriers or computational intractability. Underlying both our upper and lower bounds is a tight connection that we prove between multi-class calibration and the well-studied problem of agnostic learning in the (standard) binary prediction setting.
6/11/2024