Can AI Assistance Aid in the Grading of Handwritten Answer Sheets?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores using AI to assist in grading handwritten answer sheets.
- It examines the potential benefits and limitations of AI-powered grading systems for handwritten responses.
- The research aims to understand how AI can complement and enhance traditional manual grading processes.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates using AI technology to help grade handwritten exam answers. The idea is that an AI system could analyze the handwritten responses and provide insights or even partial grading assistance to human graders. This could potentially make the grading process more efficient, consistent, and scalable, especially for large classes or exams with many handwritten submissions.
The researchers look at related work in the area of AI-assisted grading, including efforts to use language models for grading short textual answers and advances in question answering for handwritten documents. They also consider collaborative approaches to essay scoring and using NLP to autograde mathematical proofs.
The key idea is to leverage AI's strengths, such as rapid processing and consistent application of rubrics, to enhance and support the human grading process rather than fully automate it. This "human-AI collaborative" approach aims to maintain the nuance and judgment of expert human graders while augmenting their capabilities.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by outlining the motivation for exploring AI-assisted grading of handwritten responses. Grading handwritten work can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, especially at scale, and there are concerns about consistency and potential human bias. The researchers hypothesize that AI systems could help address these challenges by providing automated analysis and partial grading assistance.
The related work section examines various efforts to apply AI and natural language processing techniques to the grading of textual responses, including short answers and mathematical proofs. These studies have demonstrated the potential for AI to complement human graders, but the unique challenges of handwritten input have not been extensively explored.
The core of the paper describes the researchers' proposed approach, which involves training an AI model to analyze handwritten exam responses. The model is designed to detect key elements of the responses, such as relevant keywords, and provide scoring recommendations to human graders. The researchers detail the data collection, model architecture, and training process used to develop this AI-powered grading assistance system.
Through experiments and user studies, the researchers evaluate the performance and usability of their AI-assisted grading approach. They assess metrics such as grading accuracy, consistency, and time savings, as well as the perceptions and experiences of both students and instructors using the system.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed exploration of using AI to enhance the grading of handwritten responses. The researchers have carefully considered the potential benefits and limitations of this approach, acknowledging the importance of maintaining human expertise and oversight in the grading process.
One potential limitation noted in the paper is the reliance on the availability of high-quality training data, which can be challenging to obtain for handwritten responses. The researchers also acknowledge that their system may struggle with more open-ended or creative responses that require nuanced human judgment.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical considerations of AI-assisted grading, such as concerns about bias, fairness, and the potential impact on student learning and assessment. These are important areas that warrant further exploration and discussion.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to leverage AI technology to improve educational assessment and grading processes. The findings offer insights and a framework for other researchers and practitioners to build upon, while also highlighting the need for continued investigation and thoughtful implementation of these technologies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling case for using AI to assist in the grading of handwritten exam responses. By combining the speed and consistency of AI analysis with the nuanced judgment of human experts, the researchers have developed a hybrid approach that aims to enhance the grading process and improve the student assessment experience.
The findings suggest that AI-assisted grading can offer benefits in terms of efficiency, consistency, and scalability, while still maintaining the essential role of human expertise. However, the paper also acknowledges the limitations and challenges that must be addressed, such as the need for high-quality training data and the importance of ethical considerations.
As AI continues to advance, the insights and frameworks presented in this paper will likely inform ongoing efforts to leverage these technologies to improve educational assessment and grading practices. By thoughtfully integrating AI into the grading process, educators may be able to free up time for more personalized feedback and support, ultimately enhancing the overall learning experience for students.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Can AI Assistance Aid in the Grading of Handwritten Answer Sheets?
Pritam Sil, Parag Chaudhuri, Bhaskaran Raman
With recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), there has been growing interest in using state of the art (SOTA) AI solutions to provide assistance in grading handwritten answer sheets. While a few commercial products exist, the question of whether AI-assistance can actually reduce grading effort and time has not yet been carefully considered in published literature. This work introduces an AI-assisted grading pipeline. The pipeline first uses text detection to automatically detect question regions present in a question paper PDF. Next, it uses SOTA text detection methods to highlight important keywords present in the handwritten answer regions of scanned answer sheets to assist in the grading process. We then evaluate a prototype implementation of the AI-assisted grading pipeline deployed on an existing e-learning management platform. The evaluation involves a total of 5 different real-life examinations across 4 different courses at a reputed institute; it consists of a total of 42 questions, 17 graders, and 468 submissions. We log and analyze the grading time for each handwritten answer while using AI assistance and without it. Our evaluations have shown that, on average, the graders take 31% less time while grading a single response and 33% less grading time while grading a single answer sheet using AI assistance.
Read more8/26/2024
0
Beyond human subjectivity and error: a novel AI grading system
Alexandra Gobrecht, Felix Tuma, Moritz Moller, Thomas Zoller, Mark Zakhvatkin, Alexandra Wuttig, Holger Sommerfeldt, Sven Schutt
The grading of open-ended questions is a high-effort, high-impact task in education. Automating this task promises a significant reduction in workload for education professionals, as well as more consistent grading outcomes for students, by circumventing human subjectivity and error. While recent breakthroughs in AI technology might facilitate such automation, this has not been demonstrated at scale. It this paper, we introduce a novel automatic short answer grading (ASAG) system. The system is based on a fine-tuned open-source transformer model which we trained on large set of exam data from university courses across a large range of disciplines. We evaluated the trained model's performance against held-out test data in a first experiment and found high accuracy levels across a broad spectrum of unseen questions, even in unseen courses. We further compared the performance of our model with that of certified human domain experts in a second experiment: we first assembled another test dataset from real historical exams - the historic grades contained in that data were awarded to students in a regulated, legally binding examination process; we therefore considered them as ground truth for our experiment. We then asked certified human domain experts and our model to grade the historic student answers again without disclosing the historic grades. Finally, we compared the hence obtained grades with the historic grades (our ground truth). We found that for the courses examined, the model deviated less from the official historic grades than the human re-graders - the model's median absolute error was 44 % smaller than the human re-graders', implying that the model is more consistent than humans in grading. These results suggest that leveraging AI enhanced grading can reduce human subjectivity, improve consistency and thus ultimately increase fairness.
Read more5/8/2024
0
Automated Assessment of Multimodal Answer Sheets in the STEM domain
Rajlaxmi Patil, Aditya Ashutosh Kulkarni, Ruturaj Ghatage, Sharvi Endait, Geetanjali Kale, Raviraj Joshi
In the domain of education, the integration of,technology has led to a transformative era, reshaping traditional,learning paradigms. Central to this evolution is the automation,of grading processes, particularly within the STEM domain encompassing Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.,While efforts to automate grading have been made in subjects,like Literature, the multifaceted nature of STEM assessments,presents unique challenges, ranging from quantitative analysis,to the interpretation of handwritten diagrams. To address these,challenges, this research endeavors to develop efficient and reliable grading methods through the implementation of automated,assessment techniques using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Our,contributions lie in two key areas: firstly, the development of a,robust system for evaluating textual answers in STEM, leveraging,sample answers for precise comparison and grading, enabled by,advanced algorithms and natural language processing techniques.,Secondly, a focus on enhancing diagram evaluation, particularly,flowcharts, within the STEM context, by transforming diagrams,into textual representations for nuanced assessment using a,Large Language Model (LLM). By bridging the gap between,visual representation and semantic meaning, our approach ensures accurate evaluation while minimizing manual intervention.,Through the integration of models such as CRAFT for text,extraction and YoloV5 for object detection, coupled with LLMs,like Mistral-7B for textual evaluation, our methodology facilitates,comprehensive assessment of multimodal answer sheets. This,paper provides a detailed account of our methodology, challenges,encountered, results, and implications, emphasizing the potential,of AI-driven approaches in revolutionizing grading practices in,STEM education.
Read more9/25/2024
🌿
0
Towards LLM-based Autograding for Short Textual Answers
Johannes Schneider, Bernd Schenk, Christina Niklaus
Grading exams is an important, labor-intensive, subjective, repetitive, and frequently challenging task. The feasibility of autograding textual responses has greatly increased thanks to the availability of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and the substantial influx of data brought about by digitalization. However, entrusting AI models with decision-making roles raises ethical considerations, mainly stemming from potential biases and issues related to generating false information. Thus, in this manuscript, we provide an evaluation of a large language model for the purpose of autograding, while also highlighting how LLMs can support educators in validating their grading procedures. Our evaluation is targeted towards automatic short textual answers grading (ASAG), spanning various languages and examinations from two distinct courses. Our findings suggest that while out-of-the-box LLMs provide a valuable tool to provide a complementary perspective, their readiness for independent automated grading remains a work in progress, necessitating human oversight.
Read more7/9/2024